Advertisement

What Happens to Safeguards if the NPT Goes?

  • David Fischer
Part of the Issues in International Security book series (IIS)

Abstract

Since 1989 the international scene has changed almost beyond recognition. It was then possible to speculate that the Treaty on the Nonproliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) might lapse because the United States and the Soviet Union would fail to reverse the nuclear arms race and that large numbers of nonnuclear-weapon states (NNWSs), exasperated by the contempt with which the nuclear-weapon states (NWSs) appeared to regard their obligations under the NPT, would oppose any significant extension of the treaty. Or that, in an even worse case, a continuing nuclear arms race would lead to a crisis in superpower relations and put an end to their cooperation in nonproliferation matters. They would no longer be able to work together in preventing the termination of the NPT; the international community would plunge into a crisis of insecurity and the rest of the world would turn to the nuclear option.

Keywords

European Union International Atomic Energy Agency Power Reactor Nuclear Weapon Nuclear Export 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. William C.Potter, “Nuclear Exports From the Former Soviet Union: What’s New, What’sTrue,” Arms Control Today(January/February 1993), pp. 3–10Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Fischer
    • 1
  1. 1.International Atomic Energy AgencyViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations