A Post -Filtering Technique for Autocorrelation Estimator in Realtime Color Flow Mapping Systems

  • Tai K. Song
Part of the Acoustical Imaging book series (ACIM, volume 21)


A new post-filtering technique to eliminate the clutter signals for the autocorrelation mean frequency estimation (ACE) method that is most commonly used in detecting the Doppler shift in Color Flow Mapping (CFM) systems is presented. In the general two dimensional Doppler imaging environment, the complex input Doppler signals contain the clutter components even after clutter filtering, which results in the estimation error or the loss of the ability to detect the low speed flow. A post-filter, which is a zero-phase FIR filter, is added after the autocorrelator to further remove the clutter components. The additional computational amount required for the post-filtering increases with the filter length until it becomes equal to the length of the autocorrelation function of the clutter filtered samples but does not change after then. This is because that only two terms of the filtered autocorrelation function are needed for the mean frequency and variance estimation. Since the post-filter can have any large number of taps, it can be designed to have arbitrary responses and find many applications. One example of applying this new technique to dramatically reduce the effect of the clutter components is provided, which is venfied by computer simulation.


Frequency Estimation Doppler Signal Power Spectrum Density Filter Length Doppler System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    D. H. Evans, W. N. Mcdicken, R. Skidmore, and J. P. woodcock, Doppler Ultrasound: Physics, Instrument and Clinical Applications. Chichester: Wiley, 1989.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    D. L. Hykes, W. R. Hedrick, and D. E. Starchman, Ultrasound Physics and Instrumentation. St. Louis: Mosby Year Book, 1992.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    J. M. Reid, “Doppler ultrasound,” IEEE Eng. Medicine and Bio. Magagine, pp. 14–17, 1987.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    A. R. G. Hokes, R. Reneman, and P. A. Peronneau, “A multigate pulsed Doppler System with serial data processing,” IEEE Trans. Sonics Ultraso., vol. SU-28, no. 4, pp. 242–247, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    C. Kasai, K. Namekawa, A. Koyano, and R. Omoto, “Real-time Two-dimensional blood flow imaging using an autocorrelation technique,” IEEE Trans. Sonics Ultraso., vol. SU-32, no. 3, pp. 458–463, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    K. Namekawa, C. Kasai, M. Tsukamoto, and A. Koyano, “Realtime blood flow imaging system utilizing auto-correlation techniques,” in Ultrasound ’82, R. A. Lerski and P. Morley, Eds. New York: Pergamon, pp. 203–208, 1982.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    M. Brandwstini, “Topoflow - A digital full range Doppler velocity meter,” IEEE Trans. Sonics Ultraso., vol. SU-25, no. 5, pp. 287–292, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    L. Gerzberg and J. D. Meindle, “Power-spectrum c entroid detection for Doppler systems application,” Ultrason. Imaging, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 232–261, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    W. D. Barber, J. W. Everhard, and S. G. Karr, “A new time domain technique for velocity measurement using Doppler ultrasound,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. BME-32, pp. 213–229, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    A. P. G. Hokes, H. P. M. Peeters, C. J. Ruissen, and P. S. Reneman, “A Novel Frequency Estimation for sampled Doppler signals,” IEEE Trans. Biome. Eng., vol. BME-31, no. 2, pp. 212–220, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    O. Bonnefous and P. Pesque, “Time domain formulation of pulse Doppler ultrasound and blood velocity estimation by cross correlation,” Ultrason. Imaging, vol. 8, pp. 73–85, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    K. Kristofferson and B. A. J. Angelson, “A comparison between mean frequency estimation for multigated Doppler systems with serial signal processing,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. BME-32, no. 9, pp. 645–657, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    R. S. Jafle, “Extended-range pulsed Doppler mean-frequency estimation based on mean-frequency prediction,” Ph.D. dissertation, G556–3, Stanford Electronics Laboratories, Stanford University, Stanford, California, U.S.A., 1983.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    T. Loupas and W. N. McDicken, “Low-order complex AR models for mean and maximum frequency estimation in the context of Doppler color flow mapping,” IEEE Trans, on UFFC, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 590–601, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Y. B. Ahn and S. B. Park, “Estimation of mean frequency and variance of ultrasonic Doppler signal by using second-order autoregressive model,” IEEE Trans, on UFFC, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 172–182, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    J. C. Willmetz, A. Nowick, and J. J. Meister, “Bias and variance in the estimate of the Doppler frequency induced by a wall motion filter,” Ultrason. Imaging, vol. 11, pp. 233–244, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tai K. Song
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Information and Communication EngineeringKorea Advanced Institute of Science and TechnologyCheongryang, SeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations