Skip to main content

Looking at the Second Law of Thermodynamics Through the Eyes of Maxwell’s Demon

  • Chapter
Thinking Physics for Teaching
  • 325 Accesses

Abstract

As we may gather from the above quotation, the Second Law of Thermodynamics maintains a privileged status for the professional scientist being the key to the explanation of most physical events. On the one hand it stands as a postulate for an extremely efficient theory such as Phenomenological Thermodynamics, on the other it holds a place of honor within the realm of physical laws because of its uniqueness; no other law expresses “impossibility” or an upper limit, or rather, all which do are in some way related to it.

The law that entropy always increases — the Second Law of thermodynamics — holds, I think, the supreme position among the laws of Nature. If someone points out to you that your pet theory of the universe is in disagreement with Maxwell’s equations- then so much worse for Maxwell’s equations. If it is found to be contradicted by observation, well, these experimentalists do bungle things sometimes. But if your theory is found to be against the Second Law of thermodynamics I can give you no hope; there is nothing for it but to collapse in deepest humiliation.

—A.S. Eddington

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bennet, C. H., 1973, Logical Reversibility of Computation, IBM J. Res. Dev., 17: 525–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennet, C. H., 1987, Demons, engines and the second law, Sci. Am., 257: 108–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brillouin, L., 1951, Maxwell’s demon cannot operate: Information and entropy, J. Appl. Phys., 22: 334–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clausius, R., 1856, On a modified form of the second foundamental theorem in the Mechanical Theory of Heat, Phil Mag., 12:81–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabor, D., 1964, Light and Information, Progress in Optics, 1: 111–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Landauer, R., 1961, Irreversibility and heat generation in the computing process, IBMJ. Res. Dev., 5: 183–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leff, H.S. and Rex, A. F., 1990, Maxwell’s demon: entropy, information, computing, Adam Hilger, Bristol

    Google Scholar 

  • Feynman, R. P., Leighton, R. B. and Sands, M., 1963, The Feynman’s Lectures on Physics, Vol. 1, Addison-Wesley, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, J. C., 1871, Theory of heat, Longmans, Green, and Co, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, J. C., 1878a, “Tait’s Thermodynamics”, in The Scientific Papers of James Clerk Maxwell (Cambridge Univ. Press, London, 1890), Vol. 2: 660–671

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, J. C., 1878b, “Diffusion”, in The Scientific Papers of James Clerk Maxwell (Cambridge Univ. Press, London, 1890), Vol. 2: 214–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R., 1957, “Irreversibility; or, entropy since 1905”, Brit. J. Phil. Sci., 8: 151–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schrödinger, E., 1967, What is life?, Cambridge Univ. Press, London (published originally in 1944)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, C. E. and Weaver, W., 1949, The Matehematical Theory of Communication, Univ. of Illinois Press, Urbana

    Google Scholar 

  • Slater, J. C., 1939, Introduction to Chemical Physics, McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Smoluchowski, M., 1914, “Gültigkeitgrenzen des zweiten Hauptsatzes der Wärmtheorie”, Vorträge über die Kinetische Theorie der materie und der Elektrizität, Teubner, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  • Szilard, L., 1929, “On the decrease of entropy in a thermodynamic system by the intervention of intelligent beings”, (Z. f. Physik, 53: 840–856) English trans. in The Collected Works of Leo Szilard: Scientific Papers, MIT Press, Cambridge (Mass.), 1972

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarsitani C. and Vicentini M., 1994, “Mental scientific representations of Thermodynamics”, to be published on Science & Education

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, W., 1851, “On the dynamical theory of heat”, Proc. Royal Soc. Edinburgh, 20: 261–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, W., 1874, “Kinetic theory of the dissipation of energy”, Nature, IX: 441–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wehrl, A., 1978, “General properties of entropy”, Rev. Mod. Phys., 50: 221–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, N., 1950, “Entropy and Information”, Proc. Symp. Appl. Math. Amer. Math. Soc, 2: 89

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Malizia, D., Tarsitani, C. (1995). Looking at the Second Law of Thermodynamics Through the Eyes of Maxwell’s Demon. In: Bernardini, C., Tarsitani, C., Vicentini, M. (eds) Thinking Physics for Teaching. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1921-8_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1921-8_28

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5786-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-1921-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics