Abstract
The study outlines historical evolution of the weight concept in physics and the currently employed ways to present this concept in physics course in intermediate — high school and college. The twentieth century changes in scientific method, science itself, social environment and theory of learning might have a direct implication in considering the way to define the weight concept. The article presents two alternative definitions. To facilitate the appropriate considerations a research effort was undertaken to investigate high schoolcollege students’ pertinent knowledge. The study shows that even after the advanced instruction (provided only to a minority of population) students badly assimilate apparent and true weight concepts and construct alternative knowledge in this domain. Students’ confusion could be interpreted as an evidence of a mismatch between the mental image of weight, students possess, and the gravitational weight definition provided by most English language physics textbooks. The article nominates the aspects in favor of operational weight definition which may improve students’ success in learning physics as it is understood nowadays.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Andersson, B. (1990). Pupils’ conceptions of matter and its transformation (age 12–16). Studies in Science Education ,18, 58–85.
Arons, A. B. (1984). Student patterns of thinking and reasoning. Physics Teacher, 22 ,21–26.
Arons, A. B. (1990). A guide to introductory physics teaching . New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Bridgman, P. W. (1952) The Nature of Some of Physical Concepts. New York: Philosophical Library.
Clement, J. (1982). Students’ preconceptions in introductory mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 50 (1), 66–71.
Chaikin, S.E. (1963). The Physical Basis of Mechanics. Moscow: Gosudarstvenoe Izdatelstvo Fisiko-Matematicheskoi Literaturi.
diSessa, A.A. (1983). Phenomenology and the evolution of intuition. In D. Genter, & A. L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models ,15–33. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
diSessa, A. A. (1990). Towards an Epistemology of Physics. (IRL Report No. 0023).
Descartes (1971) Letter to Mersenne, July 30, 1640 in “Descartes dictionary” ,NY, p.24l.
Driver, R., Guesne, E., & Tiberghien, A. (1985). Children’s Ideas in Science. London: Oxford University Press.
Euclid (1961). The book of balance. In M. Clagett (Ed.), The Science of Mechanics in Middle Ages ,24. London: Oxford University Press.
French, A. P. (1971). Newtonian Mechanics ,129–130. New York: W. W. Norton.
French, A. P. (1995). On Weightlessness. American Journal of Physics, 63 (2), 105.
Galili, I. & Bar, V. (1992). Motion implies force: where to expect vestiges of the misconception? International Journal of Science Education ,14 (1), 63–81.
Galili, I. (1993). Weight and Gravity: teachers’ ambiguity and students’ confusion about the concepts. International Journal of Science Education, 14(1), 149–162.
Galili, I. (1995). Interpretation of Students’ Understanding of the Concept of Weightlessness. Research in Science Education ,25 (1), 51–74.
Galili, I. & Bar, V. (1995). Students’ operational knowledge of weight. Submitted to Science Education.
Galili, I. & Kaplan, D. (1995). Students’ operational knowledge of weight. Submitted to International Jornal in Science Education.
Gardner, P. (1981). On centrifugal force. The Australian Science Teachers Journal, 27(3) ,69–74.
Gardner, P. (1984). Circular Motion: Some Post-Instruction Alternative Frameworks. Research in Science Education ,14, 136–145.
Glaserfeld, E. von., (1989). Cognition, Construction of Knowledge and Teaching. Syntheses ,80, 121–140.
Glaserfeld, E. von., (1992). A constructivist view of learning and teaching. In R. Duit, F. Goldberg, & H.Niedderer, (Eds.), Research in Physics Learning: Theoretical Issues and Empirical Studies. Proceedings of an International Workshop held at the University of Bremen, 29–40. Kiel: IPN.
Gunstone, R. F., & White, R. T. (1981). Understanding of Gravity. Science Education ,65 (3), 291–299.
Gunstone, R. F. & White, R. T. (1980). A Matter of Gravity. Research in Science Education ,10, 35–44.
Halliday, D., Resnick, R., & Walker., J. (1992). Fundamentals of Physics. New York: John Wiley.
Holton, G. (1956). Introduction to Concepts and Theories in Physical Science ,64. Reading, MA: Addison- Wesley.
Iona, M. (1975). The Meaning of Weight. The Physics Teacher, 13 ,263–274.
Iona, M. (1987). Weightlessness is real. The Physics Teacher, 25 ,418.
Iona, M. (1988). Weightlessness and Microgravity. The Physics Teacher, 26 ,72.
Iona, M. (1991). Mysterious usage of “Weight”. Announcer AAPT, 21(4) ,43.
Iona, M. (1995). International Weight. American Journal of Physics, 63 (2) ,106.
Jammer, M. (1957). Concepts of force. New York: Harper Torchbooks, Harper.
Keller, F. J., Gettys, W. E., & Skove, M. J. (1993). Physics. New York: McGraw Hill.
King, A. L. (1962). Weight and Weightlessness. American Journal of Physics ,30,(4), 387.
Kruger, C. J., Summers, M. K., & Palacio, D. J. (1990). An investigation of some English primary school teachers’ understanding. British Educational Research Journal ,16(4), 383–397.
Leyden, M. B., Johnson, G. P., & Barr, B. B. (1988). Introduction to physical science. Menlo Park, CA: Addison Wesley.
Losee, J. (1993). A Historical Introduction to the Philosophy of Science ,37. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Mayer, M. (1987). Common sense knowledge: the case of pressure, weight and gravity. Proceedings of the Second International Seminar on Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics ,288–310. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
Marion, J. B. & Hornyack, W. F. (1982). Physics for scientists and engineers ,Vol. 1, 129. New York: Saunders College Publishing.
Minstrell, J. (1982a). Conceptual development research in the natural setting of the classroom. In M.B. Rowe (ed.) Education for the 80’s: Science. Washington, DC: National Education Association.
Minstrell, J. (1982b). Explaining the “at rest” condition of an object. The Physics Teacher, 20 ,10–14.
Nuffield Advanced Science Physics (1985). Essex, England: Longman Group Limited.
Newton, I. (1978). Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy ,198. Chicago: Encyclopedia Britanica, Inc.
Noce, G., Torosantucci, G., & Vincentini, M. (1988). The floating of objects on the moon: prediction from a theory or experimental facts? Internationaljournal of Science Education, 10(1) ,61–70.
Orear, J. (1960). Fundamental Physics. New York: John Willey.
Piaget, J. (1972). The Child’s conception of Physical Causality. Totowa, NJ: Littlefield, Adams & Co.
Ruggiero S., Cartelli A., Dupre F. & Vincentini-Missoni M. (1985). Weight, Gravity and Air Pressure: Mental representations by Italian Middle School Pupils. European Journal of Science Education ,7(2) 181–194.
Sears, F. W., Zemansky, M. W., & Young, H. D. (1987). College physics. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
Taylor, K. (1974). Weight and Centrifugal Force, Physics Education ,9, 357–360.
Taylor, J.R., & Zafiratos, C.D. (1974). Modern Physics for Scientists and Engineers ,Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Verne, J. (1970). From the Earth to the Moon and around the Moon. New York: The Limited Editors Club.
Watts, D.M. (1982). Gravity -Don’t take it for granted! Physics Education ,17, 118–121.
Watts, D.M. (1983). A study of schoolchildren’s alternative frameworks of the concept of force. European Journal of Science Education, 5 ,(2), 217–230.
Young, H. D. (1992). Physics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Galili, I. (1995). A Modern Understanding the Origins of Students’ Difficulties to Operate with the Weight Concept. In: Bernardini, C., Tarsitani, C., Vicentini, M. (eds) Thinking Physics for Teaching. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1921-8_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1921-8_16
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5786-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-1921-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive