Advertisement

Evaluating Health Care Programs and Systems

An Epidemiologic Perspective
  • Dolores Gurnick Clement
  • Thomas T. H. Wan
  • MeriBeth Herzberg Stegall

Abstract

The evaluation of health care is vitally important to our efforts directed at reforming and improving the performance of our health care system. Evaluation is a means by which a program or a process is examined and an informed judgment is made concerning the extent of success in reaching predetermined goals. Evaluation plays two major roles in health care: (1) assuring the delivery of high quality care, and (2) providing a tool for controlling costs and promoting accountability for public program expenditures. Evaluation is not merely the application of methods; it involves managerial and political decision making pertinent to the allocation of resources to other functions such as program planning, design, implementation, and ongoing monitoring. Evaluations are done for a variety of purposes: to improve the delivery of care, to test an innovation, to determine the effectiveness of regulatory policy, or to assess the appropriateness of continuing or altering an intervention. The use of epidemiologic principles and methods in the evaluation process can clarify information required for program development or guide decisions relevant to continued operations. In addition, epidemiology provides measures, analytic study designs, and methods for investigating the effectiveness of programs in controlling disease, disability, and other health problems and for measuring their consequences in populations receiving health care services.

Keywords

Health Maintenance Organization Birth Center Lower Confidence Limit Epidemiologic Method Blood Pressure Screening 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, S., Auquier, A., Hauck, W. W., Oakes, D., Vandaele, W., and Wersberg, H. I., 1980, Statistical Methods for Comparative Studies, John Wiley & Sons, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bennett, C. L., Garfinkle, J. B., Greenfield, S., Draper, D., Rogers, W., Mathews, C., and Kanouse, D. E., 1989, The relation between hospital experience and in-hospital mortality for patients with AIDS-related PCP, JAMA 261:2975–2979.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bibeau, D., Mullen, K., McLeroy, K., Green, L., and Foshee, V., 1988, Evaluations of workplace smoking cessation programs: A critique, Am. J. Prey. Med. 4:87–95.Google Scholar
  4. Bollen, K., 1989, Structural Equations with Latent Variables,John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Box, G. E. P., and Jenkins, G. M., 1976, Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control, Holden-Day, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  6. Carlisle, D. M., Siu, A., Keeler, E. B., McGlynn, E. A., Kahn, K. L., Rubenstein, L. V., and Brook, R. H., 1992, HMO vs. fee-for-service care of older persons with acute myocardial infarction, Am. J. Public Health 82:1626–1630.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cox, D. R., Regression models and life-tables, J. R. Statist. Soc. B34:187–220.Google Scholar
  8. Donabedian, A., 1980, Explorations in Quality Assessment and Monitoring,Vol. I: The Definition of Quality and Approaches to Its Assessment, Health Administration Press, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
  9. Donabedian, A., 1981, Advantages and limitations of explicit criteria for assessing the quality of health care, Milbank Mem. Fund Q. Health Soc. 59:99–106.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Greenlick, M. R., 1981, Assessing clinical competence: A society view, Eval. Health Professions 4:3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Health Care Financing Administration, 1992, Medicare Hospital Information, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  12. Hedrick, S. C., Koepsell, T. D., and Inui, T., 1989, Meta-analysis of home-care effects on mortality and nursing-home placement, Med. Care 27:1015–1026.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Joreskog, K. G., and Sorbom, D., 1993, Lisrel 8 with Prelis 2, Scientific Software International, Chicago.Google Scholar
  14. Kahn, H. A., and Sempos, C. T., 1989, Statistical Methods in Epidemiology,Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Kaplan, E. L., and Meier, R, 1958, Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations, J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 53:457–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Knaus, W. A., Draper, E. A., and Wagner, D. R, 1983, Toward quality review in intensive care: The APACHE system, Quality Rev. Bull. 9:(7):196–204.Google Scholar
  17. Kotchen, J. M., McKean, H. E., Jackson-Thayer, S., Moore, R. W., Straus, R., and Kotchen, T., 1986, Impact of a rural high blood pressure control program on hypertension control and cardiovascular disease mortality, JAMA 255:2177–2182.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lane, D. S., Polednak, A. R, and Burg, M. A., 1992, Breast cancer screening practices among users of county-funded health centers vs. women in the entire community, Am. J. Public Health 82:199–203.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Levy, R. S., and Lemeshow, S., 1980, Sampling for Health Professionals, Lifetime Learning, Belmont, CA.Google Scholar
  20. National Institute on Drug Abuse, 1985, National Household Survey on Drug Abuse: 1985 Population Estimates, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Rockville, MD.Google Scholar
  21. Okada, L. M., and Wan, T. T. H., 1980, Impact of community health centers and Medicaid on the use of health services, Public Health Rep. 95:520–534.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Retchin, S. M., and Brown, B., 1990, The quality of ambulatory care in Medicare health maintenance organizations, Am. J. Publ. Health 80:411–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rogers, P. N., and Schoenig, S. E., 1993, A time series evaluation of California’s 1982 driving-under-the-influence legislative reforms, Accid. Anal. Prey. 26:63–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rooks, J. P., Weatherby, N. L., Ernst, E., Stapleton, S., Rosen, D., and Rosenfield, A.,1989, Outcomes of care in birth centers, N. Engl. J. Med. 321:1804–1811.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rosen, H. M., and Feigin, W., Sr., 1983, Quality assurance and data feedback, Health Care Manage. Rev. 8:67–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Sackett, D. L., 1979, Bias in analytic research, J. Chron. Dis. 32:51–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Vogt, T. M., and Schweitzer, S. O., 1985, Medical costs of cigarette smoking in a health maintenance organization, Am. J. Epidemiol. 122:1060–1066.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Wan, T. T. H., 1992, Hospital variations in adverse patient outcomes, Qual. Assur. Util. Rev. 7:50–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Wan, T. T. H., Weissert, W. G., and Livieratos, B. B., 1980, Geriatric day care and homemaker services: An experimental study, J. Gerontol. 35:256–274.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Warner, K., and Luce, B. R., 1982, Cost—Benefit and Cost—Effectiveness Analysis in Health Care: Principles, Practice, and Potential, Health Administration Press, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
  31. Wolinsky, F. D., and Johnson, R. J., 1991, The use of health services by older adults, J. Gerontol. 46:S345–357.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Young, G. J., and Cohen, B. B., 1991, Inequities in hospital care, the Massachusetts Experience, Inquiry 28:255–262.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dolores Gurnick Clement
    • 1
  • Thomas T. H. Wan
    • 1
  • MeriBeth Herzberg Stegall
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Health AdministrationVirginia Commonwealth University, Medical College of VirginiaRichmondUSA
  2. 2.Program in Healthcare AdministrationUniversity of Osteopathic Medicine and Health SciencesDes MoinesUSA

Personalised recommendations