Pre-Earthquake Ionospheric Effects and their Possible Mechanisms

  • S. A. Pulinets
  • A. D. Legen’ka
  • V. A. Alekseev

Abstract

The effects of seismic activity on the ionosphere are now well known and were studied by many scholars (Liperovski et al., 1992 and references herein). Naturally the most interest is connected with those phenomena which could be observed before the main shock but definitely are coupled with the preparing earthquake. Among the ionospheric phenomena we can mention variation of phase of VLF signals (Gufeld and Marenko, 1992; Gufeld et al., 1992), variations of HF signals intensity on passes over the epicenter of preparing earthquake (Gokhberg et al., 1988a), appearing or increasing of Es layers and additional layers (Gokhberg et al., 1988b), spread phenomena on bottomside ionograms within the whole range of altitudes (Khakimov et al., 1991). Sometimes one can observe not only spread phenomena but the large-scale variations of electron density in F-layer occupying the area over the future epicenter with diameter more than 1000 km (Zelenova and Legen’ka, 1989; Pulinets et al., 1991). We can observe changes not only of the electron density but accopmained by temperature, height scale, ion composition variations (Ahmamedov, 1993; Mikhailova et al, 1991). So we can conclude that changes in the state of the ionosphere over the epicenter of future earthquake are profound and comprehensive on all altitudes.

Keywords

Burning Stratigraphy Peru Dian Orogenesis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ahmamedov H., 1993, Interferometer temperature measurements in the ionosphere F-2 region during the Iranian earthquake of June 20 1990, Geomagnetism and Aeronomy. 33: 163Google Scholar
  2. Alekseev V. A. and Alekseeva N. G., 1992, Investigation of metal transfer in the biosphere during gaseous emission in zones of tectonic activity using methods of nuclear-physics, Nucl. Geophys. 6: 99.Google Scholar
  3. Chasovitin Yu. K. and Nesterov V. P., 1975, The dynamical processes and the night-time ionospheric E-layer formation, IEM Transactions. 3: 55.Google Scholar
  4. Fux I. M. and Gufeld I. L., 1993, Private communicationGoogle Scholar
  5. Gokhberg M. B., Pilipenko V. A., and Pokhotelov O. A., 1983, On the seismic precursors in the ionosphere, Izvestiya USSR Acad. of Sci., Phys. of the Earth. 10: 17.Google Scholar
  6. Gokhberg M. B., Morgunov V. A., and Pokhotelov O. A., 1988, “Seismo-Electromagnetic Phenomena”, Nauka publ., Moscow.Google Scholar
  7. Gokhberg M. B., Kolokolov L. E., Liperovski V. A., Pokhotelov O. A., Buloshnikov A. M., Marakhovski A. V., Liperovskaya E. V., 1988, Manifestation of the sttong earthquakes preparing effects in the sporadic E, layer on different latitudes, Preprint IFZ RAN. No1.Google Scholar
  8. Gufeld I. L., Marenko V. F. and Yampolski V. S., 1992, Statistical analysis of the “Omega” transmitter phase disturbances coupling with the seismotectonical process, Preprint IFZ RAN. No 11.Google Scholar
  9. Gufeld I. L. and Marenko V. F., 1992, The short-term prediction for the time of strong earthquakes with the help of radiowave technique, Doklady RAN. 323: 1064.Google Scholar
  10. Karimov K. A., Drobzhev V. I., Solonitsyna N. F., and Gainutdinova R. D., 1990, On the some ionosphere-magnetosphere and atmosphere effects connected with the seismotectonic processes at Kazakhstan and Kirgizia, Preprint Kirgizian Acad. Sci., Frunze.Google Scholar
  11. Khakimov F. Kh., Liperovski V. A., Shalimov S. L., Alimov O. A., Rubtsov L. N., Liperovskaya R. H., 1991, F-spread in the ionosphere of the seismoactive region during periods of the earthquakes preparing, Doklady Tadzh. Acad. Sci., 34: 567.Google Scholar
  12. Kikuchi H., 1991, Meteorologico-electric phenomena and electrohydrodynamics (EHD) or electromagnetohydrodynamics (EMHD), in: “Environmental and Space Electromagnetics”, H. Kikuchi, ed., Springer-verlag, Tokyo.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kikuchi T., 1991, Ionospheric disturbances over Japan during magnetic storms of 9/89, 6/90 and 3/91, in: “SUNDIAL Workshop Proceedings”, E. P. Szuszczewicz ed., SAIC publ., Reston.Google Scholar
  14. Kim V. P., Hegaj V. V. and Illich-Svitych P. V., 1988a, On the possibility of metallic ions layer formation in the E-layer of the night-time ionosphere before the strong earthquake, Preprint IZMIRAN. No 29 (783).Google Scholar
  15. Kim V. P., Hegaj V. V. and Illich-Svitych P. V., 1988b, On a possible ionospheric presage of earthquakes, Preprint IZMIRAN. No 29a(783).Google Scholar
  16. Kumar S., Hanson W. B., 1980, The morphology of metallic ions in the upper atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res., A35: 133.Google Scholar
  17. Liperovski V. A., Pokhotelov O. A., and Shalimov S. L., 1992, “Ionospheric Precursors of the Earthquakes”, Nauka publ., Moscow.Google Scholar
  18. Mikhailova G. A., Kapustina O. V., Kostin V. M., Mikhajlov Yu. M., 1991, Anomalous spectra of VLF emission in the outer ionosphere related to the Iranian earthquake of June 1990, Geomagnetism and Aeronomy. 30: 837.Google Scholar
  19. Molchanov O. A., 1992, Seismogenic EM emissions in the upper ionosphere: theoretical considerations, in: “Proceedings of 11 International Wroclaw URSI symposium on electromagnetic compatibility”, part 2, URSI publ., Wroclaw.Google Scholar
  20. Morgunov V. A., Matveev I. V. and Statiev A. A., 1990, Atmospheric electricity within the zone of tectonic fracture, Magnitospheric study. 15: 65Google Scholar
  21. Morgunov V. A., 1992, “Natural Investigations of the Electromagnetic Processes on the Final Study of Earthquake Preparing”, Thesis Dr. of Sci., IFZ publ., Moscow.Google Scholar
  22. Nikolishin I. J., Alekseeva N. G., Golinezky N. G., Malakhov S. G., 1985, Microelements distribution in different size aerosol particles in high mountain atmosphere, in: “Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Nuclear-Physical Methods of Analysis in Monitoring the Environment”, Gidrometeoizdat publ., Leningrad.Google Scholar
  23. Parrot M. and Mogilevski M. M., 1989, VLF emissions associated with earthquakes and observed in the ionosphere and the magnetosphere, Phys. Earth. Planet. Inter., 57: 86.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Parrot M., Lefeuvre F., Corcuff J. and Codefrov P., 1985, Observation of VLF emission at the time of earthquake in the Kerguelen Islands, Annales Geophys. 3: 731.ADSGoogle Scholar
  25. Pulinets S. A., Legen’ka A. D., Karpachev A. T., Kochenova N. A., Migulin V. V., Oraevski V. N. and Fligel M. D., 1991, On the possibility of the earthquakes prediction on the basis of the topside satellite sounding, Preprint IZMIRAN. No.34a(981).Google Scholar
  26. Romanovski Yu. A., Gaidukov V. Yu., 1976, On the internal gravitational waves effects on the ion composition disturbances of the night-time F2 region during magnetic storm, Doklady USSR Acad. Sci. 230: 563.Google Scholar
  27. Sadovski M. A., Bannov Yu. A., Mirsoev K. M., and Negmatullaev S. Kh., 1985, Effects of confusion of equilibrium state of the functions of temperature and pressure in the atmosphere within the closed volumes before the earthquakes, Earthquakes predictions. 6: 242.Google Scholar
  28. Saraev V. A. and Ivaniva N. T., 1979, Reflection of the litosphere structure in the field of the storm activity, in: “Geology, Stratigraphy and the Siberian Economic Minerals”, Nauka publ., Tomsk.Google Scholar
  29. Voitov G. I., 1986, Chemistry and scales of present gas flow in different geosphere zones of the Earth, Russ. Chem. Soc. 31: 533.Google Scholar
  30. Wilkinson P. J., Szuszczewicz E. P. and Roble R. G., 1992, Measurement and modelling of intermediate, descending and sporadic layers in the lower ionosphere: results and implications for global-scale ionospheric-thermospheric studies, Geophys. Res. L. 19: 95.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zelenova T. I. and Legen’ka A. D., 1989, Ionospheric effects connected with the Moneron earthquake 05.09.71, Izvesiiya USSR Acad. Sci. 6: 89.Google Scholar
  32. Zelenova T. I., Kanonidi Kh. D., Kolokolov L. E., Legen’ka A. D., Marakhovski A. V., Nazarets V. P., Osipov N. K., 1991, Ionospheric disturbances in the magnetically conjugated regions as a manifestation of ionosphere-magnetosphere coupling processes, Preprint IZMIRAN. No 9 (894).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. A. Pulinets
    • 1
  • A. D. Legen’ka
    • 1
  • V. A. Alekseev
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism, Ionosphere and Radiowave PropagationRussian Academy of Sciences (IZMIRAN), IZMIRANTroitsk, Moscow RegionRussia
  2. 2.Troitsk Institute for Innovation in Thermonuclear Investigations (TRINITI)TRINITITroitsk, Moscow RegionRussia

Personalised recommendations