Skip to main content

The Nature of Bail Decisionmaking in Dade County

  • Chapter
  • 56 Accesses

Part of the book series: The Plenum Series in Crime and Justice ((PSIC))

Abstract

Initially, the Judicial Steering Committee in Dade County directed the research staff to examine bail and pretrial release practices for both misdemeanor and felony defendants. After discussion of the preliminary results at the first few meetings, the committee requested that we focus our attention on cases being processed as potentially bondable felonies.1The path taken by felony cases was quite different from the one followed by misdemeanors. Dade County felony arrestees were booked at the central pretrial-detention facility to await a bond hearing. The bond hearing, presided over by a county court judge during the week and a circuit court judge on weekends, could be held very shortly after arrest or as much as 12 hours later, depending on the timing of the arrest and the next scheduled court session. Theoretically, all bondable defendants were interviewed by pretrial services staff before the bond hearing; however, felony defendants had the opportunity to pay their bond as specified by a bond schedule, or to have the money posted by a friend, a relative, or a bondsman.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. This is done periodically by a committee of judges and is based mostly on the way offenses are graded under the criminal code, with some exceptions principally relating to local ordinances.

    Google Scholar 

  2. For good examples of critical discussions in this area, see Beeley (1927); Foote (1954); ABA (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  3. For the purposes of this analysis, we considered the policy of permitting release through the bond schedule at booking a “decision.”

    Google Scholar 

  4. See the discussion of some of the obstacles to successful statistical prediction described in the context of Maricopa County in Chapter 7.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Goldkamp, J.S., Gottfredson, M.R., Jones, P.R., Weiland, D. (1995). The Nature of Bail Decisionmaking in Dade County. In: Personal Liberty and Community Safety. The Plenum Series in Crime and Justice. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1821-1_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1821-1_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5736-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-1821-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics