Abstract
We have already described some features of the defendants and their cases entering the three court systems. In Chapter 6, we briefly contrasted the decisions made about each cohort of defendants and their detention or release outcomes. We found differences among the sites in the characteristics of defendants entering the court systems and in the kinds of offenses with which they had been charged. In reviewing the bail decisions made regarding the entering defendants and the subsequent use of pretrial release and detention, we again noted key differences—even between Dade and Maricopa counties, the jurisdictions with the most similar felony caseloads. For example, although the Boston Municipal Court generated the highest rate of release among its heavily misdemeanant caseload, it also produced by far the highest rates of defendant misconduct during pretrial release. Circuit court in Dade County managed to release 80 percent of its felony defendants before trial and yet still succeeded in producing, of the three sites, the lowest flight and crime rates among defendants on pretrial release. Finally, the Superior Court in Maricopa County released dramatically fewer defendants than its companion courts, about half the proportion of defendants released by the Dade court. However, the frequent resort to pretrial detention in that jurisdiction did not produce misconduct rates that were even as good as those found in Dade County.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
For a detailed discussion of the principle of release under least restrictive conditions and analysis of state and federal laws, see Goldkamp (1985).
Knowledge of nine variables was able to explain 70 percent of the variance in release versus detention of Maricopa defendants.
Severity of charge has not been found to relate to prediction of flight or crime during pretrial release, although kind of charged offense has.
Goodness-of-fit chi-squared = 1.5; DF = 4; P value = 0.83; n = 1,211.
Goodness-of-fit chi-squared = 13.73; DF= 17, P value = 0.69; n= 1,211.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Goldkamp, J.S., Gottfredson, M.R., Jones, P.R., Weiland, D. (1995). The Nature of Bail Decisionmaking in Maricopa County. In: Personal Liberty and Community Safety. The Plenum Series in Crime and Justice. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1821-1_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1821-1_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5736-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-1821-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive