Skip to main content

The Courts in Boston, Dade County, and Maricopa County

  • Chapter
  • 56 Accesses

Part of the book series: The Plenum Series in Crime and Justice ((PSIC))

Abstract

To begin our research, it was necessary to select three sites that not only had the willingness to participate in the self-study process but that also exhibited features likely to prove challenging for the method and to provide useful examples for other court systems. Selection of the sites was guided by three general principles: (1) they had to vary from Philadelphia and one another in legal and organizational structure; (2) they had to have concerns about aspects of bail and pretrial detention practices they would like to address; and (3) they had to have overcrowded jails.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See Goldkamp (1985) for discussion.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Inmates of Suffolk County Jail v. Eisenstadt et al., 360 F. Supp. 676–693, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ann. Laws Mass. C. 276:58.

    Google Scholar 

  4. The state office of the bail commissioner reports to the chief justice of the superior court.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bridges v. SandstromF. Supp., U.S. District Court for So. Fla., No. 74 994, Jan. 2, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fla. Stat. Ch. 903.046.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fla. Stat. Ch. 907.041.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Id.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Id.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Id.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Id.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fla. Stat. Ch. 960.30 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hart v. Hill, CIV 77 479 PHX EHC MS (1980). See Pryor and Murray (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ariz. Const. Art. II:22; Ariz. Stat. Art. 12:13 3961.

    Google Scholar 

  15. We dropped motor vehicle theft and larceny from the FBI’s index offense list to provide a measure of more serious offenses. See Note 18, above.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Goldkamp, J.S., Gottfredson, M.R., Jones, P.R., Weiland, D. (1995). The Courts in Boston, Dade County, and Maricopa County. In: Personal Liberty and Community Safety. The Plenum Series in Crime and Justice. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1821-1_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1821-1_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5736-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-1821-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics