A Business Process Driven Multidatabase Integration Methodology
As companies evolve to meet their growing competitive needs, so do the requirements they place on their information systems. Legacy systems need to be updated to newer, more efficient platforms; more functions need to be automated; data in different systems must be correlated and integrated to produce more desperately needed leverage; interoperability is the key word as new business structures evolve from the computing power now available.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Batini, Ceri and Navathe.Conceptual Database Design - An Entity-Relationship Approach.Benjamin Cummings, 1992.Google Scholar
- 2.Jan Dietz. Business Modelling for Business Redesign. InProceedings of 27th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.IEEE Computer Science Press, 1994.Google Scholar
- 3.Geller, Perl, Neuhold and Sheth. Structural Schema Integration with Full and Partial Correspondence using the Dual Model. Technical Report CIS-91–11, New Jersey Institute of Technology. Newark, NJ 07102, November 1991.Google Scholar
- 4.Kim and Seo. Classifying Schematic and Data Heterogeneity in Multidatabase Systems.IEEE Computer: Special Issues in Multidatabase Systemspages 12–18, December 1991.Google Scholar
- 5.Nijssen and Halpin.Conceptual Schema and Relational Database Design - A Fact Oriented Approach.Prentice Hall, 1989.Google Scholar
- 6.J. Semich. Where Do Client/Server Applications Go Wrong.Software Magazinepages 53–56, April 1994.Google Scholar
- 7.Spaccapietra and Parent. Conflicts and Correspondence Assertions in Interoperable Databases.SIGMOD Record - Special Issue: Semantic Issues in Multidatabase Systems20(4), December 1991.Google Scholar
- 8.Urban and Wu. Resolving Semantic Heterogeneity Through the Explicit Representation of Data Model Semantics.SIGMOD Record - Special Issue: Semantic Issues in Multidatabase Systems20(4), December 1991.Google Scholar