Skip to main content
  • 1258 Accesses

Abstract

Deterministic concepts based on allowable stresses and on a single deterministic safety factor are being replaced in structural steel design specifications by semiprobabilistic concepts offering a better evaluĀ­ation of random variables, such as material properties and loads, affecting the reliability of structures. The reliability assessment procedure, called the limit states method (or load and resistance factor design [LRFD]1), is based on the statistical evaluation of material properties, loading effects, and other strucĀ­tural parameters. Because of the lack of information on the probability distributions of individual random variables and their interaction, the current applications of reliability methods in specifications are based on various simplifications and have a deterministic format expressed in terms of partial safety factors related to the loads (load factors) and the resistance of the structure (resistance factors).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • AISC (American Institute of Steel Construction) (1986). Manual for Steel Construction, Load and Resistance Factor Design. Chicago, Illinois: American Institute of Steel Construction.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • AISI (American Iron and Steel Institute) (1974). Stainless Steel Cold-Formed Structural Design Manual. WashĀ­ington, D.C.: American Iron and Steel Institute.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • ASCE (American Society of Civil Engineers) (1990). Specification for the Design of Cold-Framed Stainless Steel Structural Members. New York: American Society of Civil Engineers.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Bathon, L. A. (1992). Probabilistic Determination of Failure Load Capacity Variations for Lattice Type Structures Based on Yield Strength Variations including Nonlinear Post-Buckling Member Performance. Ph.D. Thesis. Portland, Oregon: Portland State University.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Committee on Fatigue and Fracture of the Committee on Structural Safety and Reliability of Structural Division. (1982). Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE 108(ST1):80.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • CSA (Canadian Standards Association) (1974). Steel Structures for Buildingsā€”Limit States Design. Standard CSA S16.1ā€“1974. Rexdale, Ontario, Canada: Canadian Institute of Steel Construction.662 Applications in Steel Structures

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • CSN (Czechoslovak Institute for Standards) (1969). Standard Design of Steel Structures [in Czech]. UNM Praha, Czech Republic: Czechoslovak Institute for Standards. (1969 and 1984 editions).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Ellingwood, B., and T. V. Galambos (1982). Probability-based criteria for structural design. Structural Safety pp. 15ā€“26.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • EUROCODE (1984). Common Unified Rules for Steel Structures, rev. ed. 1992. Eurocode No. 3. Brussels, Belgium: Commission of the European Communities.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Galambos, T. V., and M. K. Ravindra (1977). The basis for load and resistance factor design criteria for steel building structures. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 4:178ā€“189.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Galambos, T. V., and M. K. Ravindra (1978). Properties of steel for use in LRFD. Journal of the Structural Engineering Division, ASCE 104(ST9):1459ā€“1468.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Hsiao, L. E., W. W. Yu, and T. V. Galambos (1989). Load and Resistance Factor Design of Cold-Formed Steel: Load and Resistance Factor Design Specification for Cold-Formed Steel Structural Members with CornĀ­mentary (12th Progress Report). Rolla, Missouri: University of Missouri.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Lin, S.H., W. W. Yu, and T. V. Galambos (1988). Load and Resistance Factor Design of Cold-Formed Stainless Steel: Statistical Analysis of Material Properties and Development of the LRFD Provision (5th Progress Report). Rolla, Missouri: University of Missouri.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Lin, S.-H., W. W. Yu, and T. V. Galambos (1992). ASCE LRFD method for stainless steel structures. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE 118(ST4):1056ā€“1069.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Lind, N. C. 1972. Theory of Codified Structural Design. Waterloo, Ontario, Canada: University of Waterloo.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Mahadevan, S., and A. Haldar (1991). Stochastic finite element method based validation of LRFD. Journal of the Structural Engineering Division, ASCE 117(ST5):1393ā€“1412.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Marek, P., and W. J. Venuti (1990). On the combination of load effects. Journal of Constructional Steel Research 16:193ā€“203.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Marek, P., W. J. Venuti, and M. Gustar (1990). Combinations of design tensile yield stresses in built-up sections [in French]. Construction Metallique 4:17ā€“22.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Marek, P., M. Gustar, and P. J. Tikalsky (1993). Monte Carlo simulation-a tool for better understanding of LRFD. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE 119(ST5):1586ā€“1599.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Mrazik, A. (1987). Reliability Theory of Steel Structures [in Slovak]. Bratislava, Slovakia: Veda.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • M-Star (1991). Monte Carlo Simulation Computer Program. Davis, California: HAB International.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Ravindra, M. K., and T. V. Galambos (1978). Load and Resistance factor design for steel. Journal of the Structural Engineering Division, ASCE 104(ST9):1337ā€“1353.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Ravindra, M. K., and T. V. Galambos (1979). LRFD criteria for connections. Journal of the Structural Engineering Division, ASCE 106(ST9):1427ā€“1441.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • RESCOM (1990). Monte Carlo Simulation-Evaluation of Response Combinations (Simultaneous Effect of More Loadings). Praha, Czech Republic: APRO, Ltd.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Sundararaian, C. (1985). Probabilistic structural analysis by Monte Carlo simulation. In: Decade of Progress in Pressure Vessel and Piping Technology. New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp. 743Ā­-760.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Wen, Y. K. (1990). Structural Load Modeling and Combination for Performance and Safety Evaluation. New York: Elsevier Science Publishers.

    Google ScholarĀ 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

Ā© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Marek, P. (1995). Applications in Steel Structures. In: Sundararajan, C. (eds) Probabilistic Structural Mechanics Handbook. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1771-9_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1771-9_27

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5713-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-1771-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics