Advertisement

Government, Markets and Privacy in the Digital Age

  • Paul H. Rubin
  • Thomas M. Lenard

Abstract

This book presents an evaluation of proposals to increase government regulation of the commercial use of personal information. Such proposals would require, for example, that companies provide specific notifications about their information management practices, or obtain the “opt-in” permission of consumers before collecting or using information about them. There is heated debate in Congress and elsewhere about the need for such regulation. Our goal is to inform that debate by applying widely accepted criteria to the analysis of government regulation: We ask, simply put, whether there are failures in the marketplace that result in consumer harm, and, if so, whether proposed new regulations would ameliorate these problems and yield consumer benefits greater than their costs.

Keywords

Federal Trade Commission Retail Sale Identity Theft Credit Card Fraud Fair Information Practice 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 25.
    See, for example, Esther Dyson, George Gilder, George A. Keyworth and Alvin Toffler, “A Magna Carta for the Knowledge Age,” Future Insight 1.2, August 1994.Google Scholar
  2. 26.
    For further discussion of these issues, see Alan Raul, Privacy and the Digital State, The Progress & Freedom Foundation, 2001.Google Scholar
  3. 29.
    When the Bush Administration took office in January 2001, there was substantial controversy over whether it should implement the medical-records privacy rules adopted by the outgoing Clinton Administration. Among the controversial items were provisions that might have blocked parents’ access to their childrens’ medical records or prevented relatives or friends from picking up prescriptions. Ultimately, the Bush Administration decided not to delay the new rules. See Laurie McGinley and Sarah Lueck, “Bush Won’t Delay Medical-Privacy Rules Despite Objections by Hospitals, HMOs,” The Wall Street Journal, April 12, 2001.Google Scholar
  4. 30.
    Surveys done in 2000 indicate that between 75 and 135 million Americans were online. Jeffrey Eisenach, Thomas Lenard and Stephen McGonegal, The Digital Economy Fact Book, Second Edition, The Progress & Freedom Foundation, 2000.Google Scholar
  5. 31.
  6. 32.
    Yannis Bakos, “The Emerging Landscape for Retail E-Commerce,” 15 Journal of Economic Perspectives, 69–80, Winter, 2001.Google Scholar
  7. 33.
    Maryann Jones Thompson, “Scorecard for 2000,” The Standard, March 19, 2001, at http://www.thestandard.com/article/display/0,1151,22825,00.html.
  8. 34.
    This was a finding of research conducted by the Direct Marketing Association in cooperation with W.A. Dean and Associates. The DMA State of Catalogue/Interactive 2000, “The Convergence of Catalogue and E-Commerce,” October 2000.Google Scholar
  9. 35.
    Yannis Bakos, “The Emerging Landscape for Retail E-Commerce,” 15 Journal of Economic Perspectives, 69–80, Winter, 2001.Google Scholar
  10. 36.
    Ira C. Magaziner, Creating a Framework for Global Electronic Commerce,” Future Insight, The Progress & Freedom Foundation, July 1999.Google Scholar
  11. 37.
    For a complete discussion of these issues, see Eugene Volokh, “Freedom of Speech and Information Privacy: The Troubling Implications of a Right to Stop People from Talking About You,” Progress on Point 7.15, October 2000 (previously published in the Stanford Law Review, Vol. 52, No.5, May 2000, pp. 1049–1124).Google Scholar
  12. 38.
    Patrick Ross, “Congress moves at light speed with Internet bills,” CNET News.com, January 5, 2001.Google Scholar
  13. 39.
    Christopher Stern, “New Congress Could Tackle Important Internet Issues,” Washington Post, December 29, 2000. The other issues are taxation and copyright reform, but privacy is discussed first.Google Scholar
  14. 40.
    Carl S. Kaplan, “Looking Forward,” New York Times December 28, 2000.Google Scholar
  15. 41.
    Identity theft state laws, available on the FTC Web site, http://www.consumer.gov/idtheft/statelaw.htm, visited March 15, 2001.
  16. 42.
    Thomas A. Fogarty, “Credit Card Fraud Takes a Fall,” USA Today, February 23, 2000.Google Scholar
  17. 43.
    Quoted in Danielle Sessa, “The Best Way to… Keep Safe,” The Wall Street Journal, Nov. 27, 2000, R25.Google Scholar
  18. 44.
    Quoted in Susan Stellin, “Using Credit Cards Online Remains Safe Despite High-Profile Security Lapses,” New York Times October 16, 2000.Google Scholar
  19. 45.
    CALPIRG, “Nowhere to Turn: Victims Speak Out On Identity Theft,” available on the CALPIRG Website, http://www.pirg.org/calpirg/consumer/privacy/idtheft2000/toppagel.htm visited January 12, 2001, p. 6.
  20. 46.
    Susannah Fox and Oliver Lewis, Fear of Online Crime, Pew Internet and American Life Project, Pew Internet Tracking Report, April 2, 2001, available at http://www.pewinternet.org.Google Scholar
  21. 47.
    Scott Bernard Nelson, “Identity Crisis,” The Boston Globe, August 27, 2000. He does add: “But technology has created new ways of storing and selling personal information and it’s likely to create more and more headaches in the future.”Google Scholar
  22. 48.
    Jennifer S. Lee, “Fighting Back When Someone Steals Your Name,” New York Times, April 8, 2001. See also Robert O’Harrow Jr., “Identity Thieves Thrive in Information Age,” Washington Post, May 31, 2110. This article indicates that, while the initial security breach typically is offline, identity thieves are using the services of commercial online data brokers.Google Scholar
  23. 49.
    Business Week, “Online Privacy: It’s Time for Rules in Wonderland,” March 20, 2000, p. 83.Google Scholar
  24. 50.
    Peter Swire, “Markets, Self-Regulation, and Government Enforcement in the Protection of Personal Information,” in Privacy and Self-Regulation in the Information Age, U. S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC, 1997, http://www.ntia.doc.gov/reports/privacy/selfregl.htm., at 1.Google Scholar
  25. 51.
    Federal Trade Commission, Privacy Online: Fair Information Practices in the Electronic Marketplace, May 2000, available online at http://www.ftc.gov/os/2000/05/index.htm#22.Google Scholar
  26. 52.
    Hon. Orson Swindle, “Privacy in a Digital World: Industry Must Lead, or Government Will,” Progress on Point 8.4, March 2001.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul H. Rubin
    • 1
    • 2
  • Thomas M. Lenard
    • 2
  1. 1.Emory UniversityUSA
  2. 2.The Progress & Freedom FoundationUSA

Personalised recommendations