Abstract
All transition countries inherited pension systems based on the principles of pay-as-you-go and defined-benefit (PAYG-DB). In the early years of operation, such systems had advantages over a fully funded, defined-contribution (FF-DC) system. For, under a PAYG-DB arrangement, those who retire receive pension benefits immediately and contributions initially tend to exceed the payments. These advantages, however, disappear later on, when population (and employment) growth rates decline and when people live longer after retirement. Under such circumstances, a FF-DC program has the advantages of greater flexibility and transparency, hence greater financial viability. The changeover from PAYG-DB systems to FF-DC systems is therefore a worldwide trend. In transition economies, this trend was reinforced by a crisis of pension finances due to three additional factors (1) large transformational recession, (2) extension of pension insurance to farmers and (3) rapid expansion of the informal economy. Factor 1 increased expenditures as early retirements became a popular way of containing the unemployment problem; it also reduced revenues as employment declined. Factor 2 increased net expenditures since farmers’ contributions have been insignificant. Factor 3 reduced revenues. These factors have therefore made this changeover more urgent and, in some countries, more rapid.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Augustinovics, Maria (1997), Introduction, in: Pension Systems and Reforms: Britain, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Sweden, EC’s Phare ACE Programme 1995, Final report, Budapest.
Cangiano, Marco, Carlo Cottarelli, and Luis Cubeddu (1998), Pension Developments and Reforms in Transition Economies, IMF Working Paper, WP/98/151.
Chand, Shetta K., and Albert Jaeger (1996), Aging Populations and Public Pension Schemes, IMF Occasional Paper, No. 147.
Chlon, Agnieszka, Marek Gora, and Michal Rutkowski (1999), Shaping Pension Reform in Poland: Security through Diversity, mimeo.
De Menil, Georges, Stephane Hamayon, and Mihai Seitan (1999), Romania’s Pension System: The Weight of the Past, CASE — Center for Social and Economic Research, Warsaw, Studies and Analyses, No. 177.
Golinowska, Stanislawa, Zofia Czepulis-Rutkowska, and Maria Szczur (1997), The Case of Poland, in: Pension Systems and Reforms: Britain, Hungary, Italy, Poland and Sweden. ACE Phare Programme 1995, Final report, Budapest.
Golinowska, Stanislawa, and Jerzy Hausner, (1998), Political Economy of the Pensions Reform, CASE Reports, No. 15, Warsaw (in Polish).
Gomulka, Stanislaw, and Piotr Jaworski (1998), Implicit Public Debt of the Polish Social Security System, CASE-CEU Working Papers Series, No. 14.
Gomulka, Stanislaw and Marek Styczeń (1999), Estimating the Impact of the 1999 Pension Reform in Poland, 2000–2050, CASE-CEU Working Papers Series, No. 27.
Hausner, Jerzy (1998), Security Through Diversity: Conditions for Successful Reform of the Pension System in Poland, Collegium Budapest, DP, No. 49, Budapest.
IMF (1998), Czech Republic: Selected Issues, IMF Staff Country Report, No. 98/36
Koch, Manfred, and Christian Thinaman (1997), From Generosity to Sustainability: The Austrian Pension System and Options for its Reform, IMF Working Paper, WP/97/10.
Nestor, Barbara, and Zoltan Vajda (1999), Does a Pensions Overhang Threaten Macroeconomic Stability? The Case for Hungary, Central European University, mimeo, May, Budapest.
Palacios, Robert and Roberto Rocha (1998), The Hungarian Pension System in Transition, Social Protection Working Paper Series, The World Bank, Washington D.C.
Polish Government (1999), Strategy of Public Finances and Economic Development: Poland 2000–2010, June, Ministry of Finance, Warsaw.
Rostaguo, Massimo V., and Francesca Utili (1997), The Italian Social Protection System: The Poverty of Welfare, IMF Working Paper, WP/98/74.
Sadka, Efraim, and Vito Tanzi (1998), Increasing Dependency Ratios, Pensions and Tax Smoothing, IMF Working Paper, WP/98/129.
Schneider, Ondrej (1999), Implicit Public Debt of the Czech Social-Security System, CASE — Center for Social and Economic Research, Warsaw, Studies and Analyses, No. 167.
Styczen, Marek (1999), Socio-demographic Forecast of Poland, 1997–2050, for Modelling Incomes and Social Security Retirement Pensions, CASE — Center for Social and Economic Research, Warsaw, Studies and Analyses, No. 168.
Vajda, Zoltan (1999), Macroeconomic Implication of the Pension Reform, CASE — Center for Social and Economic Research, Warsaw, Reports, No. 20.
World Bank (1995), Hungary: Structural Reforms for Sustainable Growth, Washington D.C.
World Bank (1997), Poland: Country Assistance Review, The World Bank, Operations Evaluations Department, Washington D.C.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gomułka, S. (2001). A Great Leap Forward? Pension Developments and Reforms in the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Romania. In: Dabrowski, M., Rostowski, J. (eds) The Eastern Enlargement of the EU. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1709-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1709-2_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5689-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-1709-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive