Abstract
Basic principles of structural dynamics are presented with emphasis on applications to the ea rthquake resistant design of building structures. Dynamic characteristics of single degree of freedom systems are discussed along with their application to single story buildings. The response of these systems to harmonic and impulse loading is described and illustrated by application to simple structures. Consideration of the earthquake response of these systems leads to the concept of the elastic response spectrum and the development of design spectra. The use of procedures based on a single degree of freedom is extended to multiple degree of freedom systems through the use of the generalized coordinate approach. The determination of generalized dynamic properties is discussed and illustrated. A simple numerical integration procedure for determining the nonlinear dynamic response is presented. The application of matrix methods for the analysis of multiple degree of freedom systems is discussed and illustrated along with earthquake response analysis. A response spectrum procedure suitable for hand calculation is presented for elastic response analyses. The nonlinear static analysis for proportional loading and the nonlinear dynamic analysis for earthquake loading are discussed and illustrated with application to building structures. Finally, the use of the recorded response from buildings containing strong motion instrumentation for verification of analytical models is discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Chopra, A, K., Dynamics of Structures, A Primer, Earthquake Engineering Research institute, Berkeley, CA, 1981.
Applied Technology Council, An Evaluation of a Response Spectrum Approach to Seismic Design of Buildings, ATC-2, Applied Technology Council, Palo Alto, CA, 1974.
Newmark, N. M., and Hall, W. J., “Procedures and Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design”, Building Practices for Disaster Mitigation, U. S. Department of Commerce, Building Science Series 46, 1973.
Clough, R. W., and Penzien, J., Structural Dynamics, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, NY, 1975.
Rayleigh, Lord, Theory of Sound, Dover Publications, New York, NY, 1945.
Lee, V. W., and Trifunac, M. D., “Strong Earthquake Ground Motion Data in EQINFOS, Part I,” Report No. 87–01, Department of Civil Engineering, USC, Los Angeles, CA, 1987.
Bathe, K. J., and Wilson, E. L., Numerical Methods in Finite Element Analysis, Prentice Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1976.
Caughy, T. K., “Classical Normal Modes in Damped Linear Dynamic systems,” Journal of Applied Mechanics, ASME, Paper No. 59-A-62, June, 1960.
Wilson, E. L., Der Kiureghian, A.Rand Bayo, E. P., “A Replacement for the SRSS Method in Seismic Analysis”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 9, 1981.
Anderson, J. C., and Gurfinkel, G., “Seismic Behavior of Framed Tubes,” International Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 4, No. 2, October-December, 1975.
Habibullah, A., “ETABS, Three Dimensional Analysis of Building Systems,” User’s Manual, Version 6.0, Computers & Structures, Inc. Berkeley, California, 1994.
Habibullah, A., “ETABS Design Postprocessors,” Version 6.0, Computers & Structures, Inc. Berkeley, California, 1994.
Anderson, J. C., “Moment Frame Building”, Buildings Case Study Project, SSC 94–06, Seismic Safety Commission, State of California, Sacramento, California, 1996.
Charney, F.A., NONLIN, Nonlinear Dynamic Time History Analysis of Single Degree of Freedom Systems, Advanced Structural Concepts, Golden, Colorado, 1996.
Norris, C.H., Hansen, R.J., Holley, M.J., Biggs, J.M., Namyet, S., and Minami, J.K., Structural Design for Dynamic Loads, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, New York, 1959.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Design of Structures to Resist the Effects of Atomic Weapons, EM 1110–345–415, 1957.
Applied Technology Council, “Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings”, ATC-40, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, California, 1991.
Anderson, J.C. and Bertero, V.V., “Seismic Performance of an Instrumented Six Story Steel Building”, Report No. UCB/EERC-91/111, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California, 1991.
California Division of Mines and Geology, “CSMIP Strong-Motion Records from the Santa Cruz Mountains (Loma Prieta) California Earthquake of October 17, 1989”, Report OSMS 89–06.
Anderson, J.C. and Bertero, V.V., “Seismic Performance of an Instrumented Six Story Steel Building”, Report No. UCB/EERC-93/01, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California at Berkeley.
Marshall, R.D., Phan, L.T. and Celebi, M., “Full Scale Measurement of Building Response to Ambient Vibration and the Loma Prieta Earthquake”, Proceedings, Fifth National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vol. II, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland, California, 1994.
Anderson, J.C., Miranda, E. and Bertero, V.V., “Evaluation of the Seismic Performance of a Thirty-Story RC Building”, Report No. UCB-EERC-93/01, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Anderson, J.C. (2001). Dynamic Response of Structures. In: Naeim, F. (eds) The Seismic Design Handbook. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1693-4_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1693-4_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5681-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-1693-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive