Skip to main content

Cardiovascular Monitoring of the Septic Patient

  • Chapter
  • 489 Accesses

Abstract

The American College of Chest Physicians & Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus [1] defines sepsis as the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) as a result of infection. Septic shock is defined as sepsis-induced hypotension despite adequate fluid resuscitation along with the presence of perfusion abnormalities. These abnormalities may include, but are not limited to, lactic acidosis, oliguria or an acute alteration in mental status. Patients who are receiving inotropic or vasopressor agents may not be hypotensive at the time that perfusion abnormalities are measured. From the years 1950–1991 mortality has soared by 13-fold [2]. Alone sepsis carries a 30–40% lethality [2] but when aggravated by shock, it has a 40–60% mortality [3]. Recently the effectiveness of invasive hemodynamic monitoring in septic shock has undergone intense scrutiny.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American College of Chest Physicians & Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus Conference. Definitions for sepsis and multiple organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. Crit Care Med 20:864, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Marik PE, Varon J. The Hemodynamic Derangements in Sepsis. Chest 114:854, 1998.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Conners AF. Right Heart Catheterization: Is it Effective? New Horizons 5:195, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pulmonary Artery Catheter Consensus Conference Participants’. Pulmonary Artery Catheter Consensus Conference: Consensus Statement. Crit Care Med 25:910, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wood LDH. The pathophysiology of the circulation in critical illness. Hall JB, Schmidt GA, Wood LDH (eds). Principles of Critical Care. New York: McGraw Hill, 2nd Edn, 1998:268.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Parillo JE. Pathogenic mechanisms of septic shock. N Engl J Med 328:1471, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Parker MM. Pathophysiology of cardiovascular dysfunction in septic shock. New Horizons 6:130, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Marik PE, Varon J. The Hemodynamic derangements in sepsis: Implications for treatment strategies. Chest 114:854, 1998.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Astiz ME, Rackow EC. Septic Shock. Lancet 351:1501, 1998.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cunnion RE, Schaer GL, Parker MM, et al. The Coronary Circulation in Human Septic Shock. Circulation 73:637, 1986.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rackow EC, Astiz ME, Weil MH. Cellular Oxygen Metabolism during Sepsis and Shock. JAMA 259:1989, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Weil MH, Afifi AA. Experimental and clinical studies in lactate and pyruvate as indicators of the severity of acute circulatory failure (shock). Circulation 41:989, 1970.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Vincent JL, Dufaye P, Berk J. Serial lactate determinations during circulatory shock. Crit Care Med 11:449, 1983.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Dorman T, Breslow MJ, Lipsett PA et al. Radial artery pressure monitoring underestimates central arterial pressure during vasopressor therapy in critically ill surgical patients. Crit Care Med 26:1646, 1998.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Coulter TD, Wiedemann HD. Complications of Hemodynamic Monitoring. Clin Chest Med No 2;June:249, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Herbst CA Jr. Indications, Management and complications of percutaneous subclavian catheters. Arch Surg 113:1421, 1978.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Felicano DV, Mattox KL, Graham JM, et al. Major complications of percutaneous subclavian vein catheters. An J Surg 138:869, 1979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Haapaniemi L, Slatis P. Supraclavicular catheterization of the superior vena cava. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 18:12, 1974.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Shah KB, Rao TL, Laughlin S, et al. A review of pulmonary artery catheterization on 6,245 patients. Anesthesiology 61:271, 1984.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sprung CL, Elser B, Schein RM, et al. Ventricular arrhythmias during Swan-Ganz catheterization of the critically ill. Chest 79:413, 1981.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sprung CL, Pozen RG, Rozanski JJ, et al. Advanced ventricular arrhythmia during bedside pulmonary artery catheterization. Am J Med 72:203, 1982.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Luck JC, Engel TR. Transient right bundle branch block with “Swan-Ganz” catheterization. Am Heart J 92:263, 1976.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Aktar M, Danato AN, Gilbert-Leeds CJ, et al. Induction of iatrogenic electrocardiographic patterns during electrophysiologic studies. Circulation 56:60, 1977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kaiser CW, Koornick AR, Smith N, et al. Choice of route for central venous cannulation: Subclavian or internal jugular vein? A prospective randomized study. J Surg Oncol 17:345, 1981.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Boyd KD, Thomas SJ, Gold J, et al. A prospective study of complications of pulmonary artery catheterizations in 500 consecutive patients. Chest 84:245, 1983.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kearney TJ, Shabot MM. Pulmonary artery rupture associated with the Swan-Ganz catheter. Chest 108:1349, 1995.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Connors AF Jr, Castele JR, Farhat NZ, et al. Complications of right heart catheterization. A prospective autopsy study. Chest 88:567, 1985.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mermel LA, Maki DG. Infectious complications of Swan-Ganz pulmonary artery catheters. Pathogenesis, epidemiology, prevention and management. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 149:1020, 1994.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Morris AH, Chapman RH, Gardner RM. Frequency of technical problems encountered in the measurement of pulmonary artery wedge pressure. Crit Care Med 12:164, 1984.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Morris AH, Chapman RH, Gardner RM. Frequency of wedge pressure errors in the ICU. Crit Care Med 13:705, 1985.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. The Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST) Investigators. Preliminary report: Effect of ecainide and flecainide on mortality in a randomized trial of arrhythmia suppression after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 321:406, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Iberti TJ, Daily EK, Leibowitz AB, Schecter CB, Fischer EP, Silverstein JH. Assessment of critical care nurses’ knowledge of the pulmonary artery catheter. Crit Care Med 22:1674, 1994.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Connors AF Jr, Speroff T, Dawson NV, et al. The effectiveness of right heart catheterization in the initial care of critically ill patients. JAMA 276: 889, 1996.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ellis RE, Mangano DT, VanDyke DC. Relation of wedge pressure to end-diastolic volume in patients undergoing myocardial revascularization. J Thoracic Cardiovasc Surg 78:605, 1979.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Calvin JE, Driedger AA, Sibbald WJ. Does the pulmonary capillary wedge pressure predict left ventricular preload in the critically ill patient? Crit Care Med 9:437, 1981.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Mitchell JP, Schuller D, Calandrio FS, Schuster DP. Improved outcome based on fluid management in critically ill patients requiring pulmonary artery catheterization. Am Rev Resp Dis 145:990, 1992.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Gan TJ, Arrowsmith JE. The esophageal Doppler monitor. A safe means of monitoring circulation. BMJ 315:893, 1997.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Nishimura RA, et al. Non-invasive measurement of cardiac output by continuous wave Doppler echocardiography: Initial experience and review of the literature. May Clin Proc 59:484, 1984.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Hattle and Angelsen. Doppler Ultrasound in cardiology, 2nd edn. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Baker DW. Applications of pulsed Doppler. Rad Clin North Am 18:79, 1980.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Nishimura RA, et al. Doppler echocardiography: Theory, instrumentation, technique and application. Mayo Clinic Proc 60:321, 1985.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Am J Cardiol 76:392, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Sohn D-W, Shin G-J, Oh JK, Tajik AJ, Click RL, Miller FA, Seward JB. Role of Transesophageal Echocardiography in Hemodynami-cally Unstable Patients. May Clin Proc 70:925, 1995.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Heidenreich J. Am Coll Cardiol 26:152, 1995.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Pearson AC. Noninvasive evaluation of the hemodynamically unstable patient: the advantage of seeing clearly. Mayo Clin Proc 70:1012, 1995.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Hayes. NEJM 330:1717, 1994.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Gattinoni. NEJM 333:1025, 1995.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Negland, Cook. Crit Care Med 24:517, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Task Force of the American College of Critical Care Medicine, Society of Critical Care Monitoring Crit Care Med 27:639, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Apostle, J.A., Guardiola, J.J. (2001). Cardiovascular Monitoring of the Septic Patient. In: Rello, J., Valles, J., Kollef, M.H. (eds) Critical Care Infectious Diseases Textbook. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1679-8_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1679-8_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5674-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-1679-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics