Abstract
The econometric issue of sample selection concerns the possible biases that arise when a nonrandomly sampled set of observations from a population is used as if the sample were random to make inferences about that population. Current literature, with a few exceptions noted below, has focused on, and finely tuned, the known results relating to this issue in the framework of the linear regression model and analysis of a continuous dependent variable, such as hours worked or wages. This paper will examine an extension of the sample selection model to the Poisson regression model for discrete, count data, such as numbers of patents, of children, of visits to facilities such as shops or recreation sites, of convictions for crimes committed, and so on.
Helpful comments of Rainer Winkelmann and participants in department seminars at Amherst College, Washington University, and the University of Umea are gratefully acknowledged.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abramovitz, M., and Stegun, I., Handbook of Mathematical Functions. New York, Dover Press, 1971.
Bockstael, N., Strand, I., McConnell, K., and Arsanjani, F., “Sample Selection Bias in the Estimation of Recreation Demand Functions: An Application to Sport Fishing,” Land Economics, 66, 1990, pp. 40–49.
Boyes, W., Hoffman, D., and Low, S., “An Econometric Analysis of the Bank Credit Scoring Problem,” Journal of Econometrics, 40, 1989, pages 3–14.
Cameron, C., and Trivedi, P., “Econometric Models Based on Count Data: Comparisons and Applications of Some Estimators and Tests,” Journal of Applied Econometrics, 1, 1986, pp. 29–54.
Cameron, C., and Trivedi, P., Models for Count Data. Oxford University Press, 1997.
Crepon, B., and Duguet, E., “Research and Development, Competition and Innovation: Pseudo-maximum Likelihood and Simulated Maximum Likelihood Methods Applied to Count Data Models with Heterogeneity,” Journal of Econometrics, 79, 1997, pp. 355–378.
Freund, D., Kniesner, T., and LoSasso, A., “Medical Care Use and Expenditures Under Medicaid Managed Care,” mimeo, School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, 1997.
Gourieroux, C., and Visser, M., “A Count Data Model with Unobserved Heterogeneity,” Journal of Econometrics, 79, 1997, pp. 247–268.
Greene, W., “A Statistical Model for Credit Scoring,” Working Paper No. EC-92-29, Department of Economics, Stern School of Business, New York University, 1992.
Greene, W., “Accounting for Excess Zeros and Sample Selection in Poisson and Negative Binomial Regression Models,” Working Paper No. EC-94-10, Department of Economics, Stern School of Business, New York University, 1994.
Greene, W., “Sample Selection in the Poisson Regression Model,” Working Paper No. EC-95-6, Department of Economics, Stern School of Business, New York University, 1995.
Greene, W., Econometric Analysis, 3rd Edition. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1997a.
Greene, W., LIMDEP. Econometric Software, Plainview, NY, 1997b.
Hausman, J., Hall, B., and Griliches, Z., Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents-R&D Relationship,” Econometrica, 52, 1984, pp. 909–938.
Heckman, J., “Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error,” Econometrica, 47, 1979, pp. 153–161.
Johnson, N., Kotz, S., and Balakrishnan, N., Continuous Univariate Distributions , Volume 1, 2 nd Edition. Wiley, New York, 1994.
Kmenta, J., “On Estimation of the CES Production Function,” International Economic Review, 8, 1967, pp. 180–189.
Lambert, D., “Zero Inflated Poisson Regression with an Application to Defects in Manufacturing,” Technometrics, 34, 1992, pp. 3–14.
Lee, L., “Generalized Econometric Models with Selectivity,” Econometrica, 51, 1983, pp. 507–512.
Maddala, G.S., Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1983.
Manski, C., “Nonparametric Bounds on Treatment Effects,” American Economic Review, 80, 2, 1990, pages 319–323.
Murphy, K., and Topel, R., “Estimation and Inference in Two Step Econometric Models,” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 3, 1985, pp. 370–379.
Nagin, D., and Land, K., “Age, Criminal Careers, and Population Heterogeneity: Specification and Estimation of a Nonparametric, Mixed Poisson Model,” Criminology, 31, 1993, pp. 327–362.
Newey, W., Powell, J., and Walker, J., “Semiparametric Estimation of Selection Models: Some Empirical Results,” American Economic Review, 80, 2, 1990, pages 324–328.
McFadden, D., and Ruud, P., “Estimation by Simulation,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 76, 1994, pp. 591–608.
Smith, V., “Selection and Recreation Demand,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 70, 1988, pp. 29–36.
Terza, J., “Estimating Count Data Models with Endogenous Switching: Sample Selection and Endogenous Treatment Effects,” Working Paper No. 4-95-15, Department of Economics, Penn State University, 1995.
Vuong, Q., “Likelihood Ratio Tests for Model Selection and Non-Nested Hypotheses,” Econometrica, 57, 1989, pp. 307–334.
White, H., “A Heteroscedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroscedasticity,” Econometrica, 48, 1980, pp. 817–838.
Winkelmann, R., “Count Data Models with Selectivity,” Discussion Paper No. 9603, Department of Economics, University of Canterbury, New Zealand, 1996.
Winkelmann, R., Econometric Analysis of Count Data, 2nd. edition, Berlin, Springer Verlag, 1997.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Greene, W. (2001). Fiml Estimation of Sample Selection Models for Count Data. In: Negishi, T., Ramachandran, R.V., Mino, K. (eds) Economic Theory, Dynamics and Markets. Research Monographs in Japan-U.S. Business & Economics, vol 5. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1677-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1677-4_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5673-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-1677-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive