Abstract
Direct Mail is just one of several choices available to firms for communicating with customers. Firms have traditional mass-media advertising as well as direct advertising and marketing. The main techniques of direct marketing are: Direct Mail; telemarketing; and direct response. A survey of Direct Mail users1 in Portugal revealed that the main advantage of this service for firms is the fact that it is a more personalized and direct method of marketing. The main disadvantages of Direct Mail among the same respondents were the low level of response, the high cost of the product and of developing appropriate material for Direct Mailing. The purpose of the present study is to analyze these and other factors that underlie the choice of Direct Mail relative to other communications methods. We focus our attention on current users of Direct Mail and their preferences, as demonstrated by their choices in the use of Direct Mail as part of their portfolio of alternative means of commercial communication. We will be especially interested in indentifying demand factors that favor the provision of Direct Mail services by the Postal Services Provider (PSP).
The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the position of CTT- Correios de Portugal. We thank Alberto Pimenta for his support and his comments on earlier versions of this paper. We are also thankful for the invaluable assistance provided by Professor João Santos Silva of the Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestão, UTL, Lisbon, Portugal, with regard to all of the subjects relating to estimation methodology. Finally, we would like to thank Professor Roger Sherman for some important insights into how to improve our previous analysis. However, any remaining errors or omissions in the paper are the sole responsibility of the authors. We also acknowledge the invaluable assistance given by our colleague Eisa Gervásio in the drawing up of the questionnaire sent to our clients and the collection of their replies.
Survey based on a sample, stratified by region and economic activity, of 183 firms for the period of 1998 to 1999. This study was made by Euroexpansão (1999). Estudo do Mercado de Direct Mail.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amemyia, T. 1981, “Qualitative Response Models: a Survey.” Journal of Economie Literature 19 (4): 481:536.
Appelbaum, Eileen R. 1979. “On the Choice of Functional Forms.” International Economic Review 20: 116–125.
Arrow, K. J., H. B. Chenery, B. S. Minhas and R. M. Solow. 1961. “Capital-Labor Substitution and Economic Efficiency.” Review of Economics and Statistics 63: 225–250.
Brochand, Bernard and Jacques Lendrevie, Joaquim Vicente Rodrigues and Pedro Dionísio.1999. Publicitor, Publicações Dom Quixote.
Christensen, L. R., D. W. Jorgenson and L. J. Lau. 1973. “Transcendental Logaritmic Production Frontiers.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 55 (February): 24–45.
Diewert, W. Erwin. 1971. “An Application of the Shepard Duality Theorem: A Generalized Leontief Production Function.” Journal of Political Economy 79 (May/June): 481–507.
Greene, W.H. 1999. Econometric Analysis, 4th ed., Prentice Hall.
Heckman J. 1979. “Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error.” Econometrica, 47: 153–161.
Johnston, J. & John DiNardo. 1997. Econometric Methods, New-York: McGraw-Hill.
Lau, L. J. 1974. “Application of Duality Theory: A Comment.” In Frontiers of Quantitative Economics, vol.2, edited by M. Intriligator and D. Kendrick, Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.
Maddala, G.S. 1987. Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
Muus, Lars, Hiek Scheer and Tom Wansbeek. 1999. “A Decision Theoretic Framework for Profit Maximization in Direct Marketing,” Department of Economics and Econometrics, Free University, Amsterdam.
Nikali, Heikki. 1999. “The Demand for Targeted Communication in Different Customer Group.” In Current Directions in Postal Reform, edited by Michael A. Crew and Paul R. Kleindorfer, Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Pimenta, Alberto and Patricia Ferreira. 1999. “Demand for Letters in Portugal.” In Emerging Competition in Postal and Delivery Services, edited by Michael A. Crew and Paul R. Kleindorfer, Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Plum, Monika. 1997. “The Challenge of Electronic Competition: Empirical Analysis of Substitution Effects on the Demand for Letter Services.” In Managing Change in the Postal and Delivery Industries, edited by Michael A. Crew and Paul R.Kleindorfer, Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Schmalensee, Richard. 1992. The Economics of Advertising, Amsterdam: North-Holland
UPU. 1997. Post 2005 Core Business Scenarios.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Santos, R.G., Lagao, S.C. (2001). The Demand for Direct Mail in Portugal. In: Crew, M.A., Kleindorfer, P.R. (eds) Future Directions in Postal Reform. Topics in Regulatory Economics and Policy Series, vol 38. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1671-2_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1671-2_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5670-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-1671-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive