Abstract
This chapter discusses business process modeling by combining two approaches: one is the DEMO methodology (Dynamic Essential Modeling of Organizations), and the other one is Organizational Semiotics. According to DEMO, when engaged in communication, the participants are trying to influence each other’s behavior, in other words, an act of saying is an act of doing. The DEMO methodology consists of several model types, each expressed in a specific diagram. They collectively provide the necessary knowledge for business process redesign and information systems development. In this chapter the interaction model and the business process model of DEMO are presented in detail. It appears that two semiotic methods- Semantic Analysis Method (SAM) and Norm Analysis Method (NAM) — are useful for extending the DEMO to enhance its clarity and ability of handling rules controlling the events and workflow.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Barjis J.; Dietz J.L.G. DEMO: Approach from Identification of Business Transaction to Simulation of Business Processes. To appear in the proceedings of the IASTED International Conference “APPLIED MODELING AND SIMULATION”, September 1–3, 1999, Cairns, Queensland, Australia.
Dietz J.L.G.; Barjis J. Supporting the DEMO Methodology with a Business Oriented Petri Net. In the proceedings of the Fourth CAiSE/ IFIP8.1 International Workshop on Evaluation of Modeling Methods in Systems Analysis and Design (EMMSAD′99), Heidelberg, Germany, June 14–15, 1999.
Dietz, J.L.G., J.B.F. Mulder, Organizational transformation requires constructional knowledge of business systems, Proc. HICCS 1998, IEEE, (1998).
Dietz, J.L.G., Modeling Business Processes for the Purpose of Redesign, in: Proc. IFIP TC8 Open Conference on BPR, Amsterdam, (1994).
Dietz, J.L.G., Understanding and modeling business processes with DEMO, in: Proc. ER′99, Annual International Conference on Conceptual Modeling, Paris, November 1999.
Dignum, F., J.L.G. Dietz, E. Verharen, H. Weigand, Communication Modeling — the Language/Action Perspective, Electronic Workshops in Computing, Springer, (1996).
Dignum, F., J.L.G. Dietz, Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Communication Modelling, Computing Science Reports, Eindhoven University of Technology, 1997.
Goldkuhl, G., M. Lind, U. Seigerroth, The Language Action Perspective on Communication Modeling, Proceedings of the Third International Workshop, Dept. Informatics, Jönköping International Business School, Boras, (1998).
Liu K. and Dix A. Norm Governed actors In CSCW, in 1st International Workshop on Computational Semiotics, Paris, (1997)
Liu, K. and T. Ong. A Modelling Approach for Handling Business Rules and Exceptions, The Computer Journal, 42(3), (1999).
Liu, K.; Alderson, A.; Shah, H.; Sharp, B. Applying Semiotic Methods to Requirements Recovery, In A. T. Wood-Hamper, N. Jayaratna, J. Wood (eds), Springer-Verlag, pp. 142–152, (1999), Methodologies for Developing and Managing Emerging Technology Based Information Systems.
Liu, Kecheng, Semiotics in Information Systems Engineering. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, (2000).
Reijswoud, V. E. van and Jan L.G. Dietz. DEMO Modeling Handbook. Delft University of Technology, Department of Information Systems, Delft, (1998).
Reijswoud, V.E. van, J.B.F. Mulder. Speech Act Based Communication and Information Modeling with DEMO. Australian Journal of Information Systems, vol. 6, No. 1, (1998), 89–102.
Reijswoud, V.E. van., The Structure of Business Communication — Theory, Model and Application, Doctoral Thesis, Delft University of Technology, Delft, (1996).
Stamper, Ronald K. (1996) Signs, Information, Norms and Systems”, in Berit Holmqvist and Peter B. Andersen, Heinz Klien and Roland Posner (eds.), Signs at Work, De Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 349–397.
Stamper, Ronald K. (1994) Social Norms in Requirements Analysis, in Jirotika, et al.
Stamper, R., K. Liu, M. Hafkamp and Y. Ades Signs plus Norms — one paradigm for organizational semiotics. The First International Workshop on Computational Semiotics, Paris, (1997).
Stamper, R.K. Organizational Semiotics. In Mingers J. and Stowell F. (eds.) Information Systems: An Emerging Discipline. Mc Graw Hill, London, (1997) 267–283.
Winograd, T. and Flores, C.F. (1986) Understanding Computers and Cognition. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Wright, V. G. H. Norms and Action — a logical inquiry. Routledge and Kegan Paul, New York, (1963).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Barjis, J., Dietz, J.L.G., Liu, K. (2001). Combining the DEMO Methodology with Semiotic Methods in Business Process Modeling. In: Liu, K., Clarke, R.J., Andersen, P.B., Stamper, R.K. (eds) Information, Organisation and Technology. Information and Organisation Design Series, vol 1. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1655-2_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1655-2_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5662-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-1655-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive