Our Mad Rush to Measure: How Did We Get into this Mess?

  • Donald W. Katzner

Abstract

In our quest to describe, analyze, understand, know, and make decisions, we moderns, it seems, attempt to measure everything. The pages of our popular newspapers and magazines are full of measures. So are our scholarly journals. We measure the physical world. We measure our society, our economy, our polity, our culture, and ourselves. Give us a problem and our impulse — almost reflex — is to measure all we can think of that relates to it. We evaluate performance by measurement. We attempt to understand our quality of life in terms of measurement. We analyze and define government policy in the context of measurement. What is not measurable we strive to render measurable, and when we cannot, we dismiss it from our thoughts and justify our neglect by assigning it the status of the “less important.” Lord Kelvin’s dictum [56, p. 80] appears to reign supreme: “... when you can measure what you are speaking about and express it in numbers you know something about it; but when you cannot measue it, when you cannot express it in number, your knowledge is of a meager and unsatisfactory kind: it may be the beginning of knowledge, but you have scarcely, in your thoughts, advanced to the stage of science, whatever the matter may be.”

Keywords

Steam Expense Hull Pyramid Arena 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Academic American Encyclopedia, v. 7 (Danbury: Grolier, 1986).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ackermann, R. J., Data, Instruments, and Theory (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baritz, L., The Servants of Power (Middletown: Wesleyan University Press, 1960).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boole, G., An Investigation of the Laws of Thought (New York: Dover, 1958).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boorstin, D. J., The Discoverers (New York: Vintage, 1983).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Booth, C., Life and Labour of the People in London (London: Macmillan, 1902).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Boring, E. G., “The Validation of Scientific Belief,” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 96 (1952), pp. 535–539.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Burtt, E. A., The Metaphysical Foundations of Modern Physical Science, 2nd ed. (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1932).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cohen, P. C., A Calculating People: The Spread of Numeracy in Early America (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Crombie, A. C., “Quantification in Medieval Physics,” in Quantification, H. Woolf, ed. (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1961), pp. 13–30.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Danziger, K. Constructing the Subject (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Drake, S., Galileo at Work (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1978).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dupree, A. H., ed., Science and the Emergence of Modern America, 1865–1916 (Chicago: Rand McNally, 1963).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Durkheim, E., The Rules of Sociological Method, S. A. Solovay and J. H. Mueller, trans. (Glencoe: Free Press, 1938).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gaster, T. H., Myth, Legend and Custom in the Old Testament (New York: Harper & Row, 1969).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gigerenzer, G., et al, The Empire of Chance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Goodman, L. A., Analyzing Qualitative/Categorical Data (Cambridge: Abt Books, 1978).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gould, S. J., The Mismeasure of Man (New York: Norton, 1981).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Grant, E., Physical Science in the Middle Ages (New York: Wiley, 1971).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Guthrie, K. S., The Pythagorean Sourcebook and Library, D. R. Fideler, ed. (Grand Rapids: Phane Press, 1987).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Heath, Sir T. L., A Manual of Greek Mathematics (New York: Dover, 1963).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kant, I., “Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science,” in Philosophy of Material Nature, J. W. Ellington, trans. (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1985).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Katzner, D. W., Choice and the Quality of Life (Beverly Hills: SAGE, 1979).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Katzner, D. W., Analysis without Measurement (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Keynes J. M., Comment on “On a Method of Statistical Business-Cycle Research. A Reply,” by J. Tinbergen, Economic Journal 50 (1940), pp. 154–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kline, M., Mathematics in Western Culture (New York: Oxford University Press, 1953).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kline, M., Mathematics and the Physical World (London: Murray, 1959).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kline, M., Mathematical Thought from Ancient to Modern Times (New York: Oxford University Press, 1972).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Koyré, A., “Galileo and Plato,” in Metaphysics and Measurement (London: Chapman & Hall, 1968), pp. 16–43.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kuhn, T. S., “The Function of Measurement in Modern Physical Science,” in Quantification, H. Woolf, ed. (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1961), pp. 31–63.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kula, W., Measures and Men, R. Szreter, trans. (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    LePlay, F., On Family, Work, and Social Change, C. B. Silver, trans. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lerner, D., “On Quantity and Quality,” in Quantity and Quality, D. Lerner, ed. (New York: Free Press, 1961), pp. 11–34.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lundberg, G. A., “Quantitative Methods in Social Psychology,” American Sociological Review 1 (1936), pp. 38–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    McClosky, D. N., “The Rhetoric of Economics,” Journal of Economic Literature 21 (1983), pp.481–517.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Mendelsohn, E., “The Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge,” in The Social Production of Scientific Knowledge, E. Mendelsohn, P. Weingart, and R. Whitley, eds. (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1977), pp. 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Menninger, K., Number Words and Number Symbols (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1969).Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Mosteller, F., and D. L. Wallace, Inference and Disputed Authorship: The Federalist (Reading: Addison-Wesley, 1964).Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Mumford, L., Technics and Civilization (New York: Harcourt Brace, 1934).Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Myrdal, G., Objectivity in Social Research (New York: Pantheon, 1969).Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Noble, D. F., America by Design (New York: Knopf, 1979).Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Pearl, R., Modes of Research in Genetics (New York: Macmillan, 1915).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Petty, Sir W., “Political Arithmetick,” in The Economic Writings of Sir William Petty, v. 1, C. H. Hull, ed. (Cambridge University Press, 1899), pp. 233–313.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Plato, The Dialogues, B. Jowett, trans., Great Books of the Western World, v. 7 (Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica, 1952).Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Porter, T. M., The Rise of Statistical Thinking 1820–1900 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Porter, T. M., Trust in Numbers (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Russell, B., The Principles of Mathematics, 2nd ed. (New York: Norton, 1937).Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Schorer, M., Introduction to Moll Flanders by D. Defoe (New York: Random House, 1950).Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Shapin, S., and S. Schaffer, Leviathan and the Air-Pump (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Shryock, R. H., “The History of Quantification in Medical Science,” in Quantification, H. Woolf, ed. (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1961), pp. 85–107.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Sills, D. L., ed., International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, v. 14 (New York: Macmillan, 1968).Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Smith, A. (pseud. G. J. W. Goodman), Supermoney (New York: Random House, 1972).Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Sorokin, P. A., Fads and Foibles in Modern Sociology and Related Sciences (Chicago: Henry Regnery, 1956).Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Spengler, J. J., “On the Progress of Quantification in Economics,” in Quantification, H. Woolf, ed. (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1961), pp. 128–146.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Standen, A., Science Is a Sacred Cow (New York: Dutton, 1950).Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Thomson, Sir W. (Baron Kelvin), “Electrical Units of Measurement,” in Popular Lectures and Addresses, v. 1 (London: Macmillan, 1891), pp. 80–143.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Tolstoy, L., War and Peace, L. Maude and A. Maude, trans. (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1942).Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Watson, J. B., Behaviorism (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1924).Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Weber, M., The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, T. Parsons, trans. (New York: Scribner, 1956).Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Weber, M., The Sociology of Religion, E. Fischoff, trans. (Boston: Beacon Press, 1963).Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Wise, M. N., “Work and Waste: Political Economy and Natural Philosophy in Nineteenth Century Britain, Parts I, II, and III,” History of Science 27 (1989), pp. 263–301, 391–449, and 28 (1990), pp. 221–261.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Donald W. Katzner
    • 1
  1. 1.University of MassachusettsUSA

Personalised recommendations