Advertisement

Standard EMI/EMC Problems for Software Evaluation

  • Bruce Archambeault
  • Colin Brench
  • Omar M. Ramahi
Part of the The Springer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science book series (SECS, volume 630)

Abstract

When considering the acquisition of an EMI/EMC modeling tool, there are many things to consider. The most obvious of these is whether the tool can be used to model the particular types of problems at hand. Additionally, it is necessary to understand the graphical user interface (GUI) and the input and output file formats. The file formats may be of particular importance if it is intended to link other tools, such as circuit simulation or mechanical CAD, to the EMI/EMC tools.

Keywords

Heat Sink Ground Plane Reference Plane IEEE International Symposium Circuit Module 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    I. Rumsey, M. Piket-May, “Application of the Finite-Difference Time-Domain (FDTD) Method to a Challenging Real-World EMC Problem,” 1999 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, pp. 679–683.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    H.-D. Bruns, H. Singer, M. Leone, “Application of the Method of Moments (MoM) to a Challenging Real-World EMC Problem,” 1999 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, pp. 684–689.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    P.E. Fornberg, A. Byers, M. Piket-May, “FDTD Modeling of Printed Circuit Board Signal Integrity and Radiation,” 2000 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, pp. 307–312.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    G. Marrocco, P. Tognolatti, “Time-Domain Macromodelling of Realistic Printed Circuit Board by FDTD and Signal Processing Tools,” 2000 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, pp. 313–318.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    J.A. Roden, “Analysis of Printed Circuit Board Structures Using the Finite-Difference Time-Domain Technique and the PML Absorbing Boundary Condition,” 2000 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, pp. 319–324.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    F. Gisin, Z. Pantic-Tanner, “Routing Differential I/O Signals Across Split Ground Planes at the Connector for EMI Control,” 2000 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, pp. 325–328.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    N. Orhanovic, R. Raghuram, N. Matsui, “Signal Propagation and Radiation of Single and Differential Microstrip Traces Over Split Image Planes,” 2000 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, pp. 339–344.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    B. Archambeault, S. Pratapneni, D. Wittwer, J. Chen, “A Proposed Set of Specific Standard EMC Modeling Problems,” Presented at 2000 International Symposium on EMC, To Be Published in 2001 International Symposium on EMC Record.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Y. Ji, B. Archambeault, T. Hubing, “Applying the Method of Moments and the Partial Element Equivalent Circuit Modeling Techniques to a Special Challenge Problem of a PC Board with Long Wires Attached,” Presented at 2000 International Symposium on EMC, To Be Published in 2001 International Symposium on EMC Record.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. Ruehli, E. Michielsson, “Comparison of Challenge Problems Using Various Time-Domain Techniques,” Presented at 2000 International Symposium on EMC, To Be Published in 2001 International Symposium on EMC Record.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bruce Archambeault
    • 1
  • Colin Brench
    • 2
  • Omar M. Ramahi
    • 3
  1. 1.IBM CorporationUSA
  2. 2.Compaq Computer CorporationUSA
  3. 3.University of Maryland at College ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations