Skip to main content

Social Norms on Agents’ Demographic Events

Preliminaries for a (multi-)agent-based approach

  • Chapter
  • 85 Accesses

Abstract

The experience of the major events in the life of people such as births, deaths, migrations and the formation of partnerships is influenced by social norms. This affects the dynamics of human populations. Nevertheless, research on the topic has not so far been able to disentangle many issues on this important idea. On the other hand, the dynamics of a population of (possibly cognitive) agents is of central importance in the construction of multi-agent systems. Demographic events, with their consequences on population dynamics, provide an interesting example also for people interested in MAS or social simulation. We discuss definition of social norms for demographic events and we exploit some categories used in formal demography to outline a typology of social norms relevant to demographic behavior. We then briefly deal with the problem of measuring social norms for demographic events from individual-level surveys. We propose a central role for (multi-) agent-based approaches to the study of social norms on demographic events.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ajzen I., 1991, “The Theory of Planned Behavior”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50: 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billari F.C., 2001, “A log logistic regression model for a transition rate with a starting threshold”, Population Studies, 55, 1 (forthcoming).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billari F.C., Ongaro F., 2000, “Micromotivazioni e macrocomportamento: un ruolo per una demografia computazionale?”, Sistemi Intelligenti, 12, 2: 303–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blossfeld H.-P., Huinink J., 1991, “Human capital investments or norms of role transition? How women’s schooling and career affect the process of family formation”, American Journal of Sociology, 97: 143–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu P., Passeron J.C., 1970, La reproduction, Paris, Les Editions de Minuit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burch T.K., 1991, “De Gustibus Confusi Sumus?”, in Siegers J.J., de Jong-Gierveld J, van Imhoff E. (Eds.), Female Labour Market Behaviour and Fertility, Berlin, Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll G.R., Hannan M.T., 2000, The Demography of Corporations and Industries, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castelfranchi C., 1998, “Simulating with Cognitive Agents: The Importance of Cognitive Emergence”, in J.S. Sichman, R. Conte, N. Gilbert (Eds.), Multi-Agent Systems and Agent-Based Simulation, Berlin, Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castelfranchi C., Conte R., Paolucci M., 1998, “Normative reputation and the cost of compliance”, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 1, 3, <http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/JASSS/1/3/3.html>.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conte R., 1997, “Diversity in rationality. A multi-agent perspective”, Paper given at the Dagstuhl Seminar on Social Science Microsimulation, May 5–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conte R., Castelfranchi C., 1995, “Understanding the functions of norms in social groups through simulation”, in Gilbert N., Conte R. (Eds.), Artificial societies. The computer simulation of social life, London, UCL Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conte R., Castelfranchi C., 1996, La società delle menti. Azione cognitiva e azione sociale, Torino, UTET. Original English edition: 1995, Cognitive and social action, London, UCL Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conte R., Castelfranchi C., 1999, “From conventions to prescriptions. Towards and integrated view of norms”, Artificial Intelligence and Law, 7: 323–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conte R., Gilbert N., Simão Sichman J., 1998, “MAS and Social Simulation: A Suitable Commitment”, in J.S. Sichman, R. Conte, N. Gilbert (Eds.), Multi-Agent Systems and Agent-Based Simulation,, Berlin, Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conte R., Falcone R., Sartor G., 1999, “Introduction: Agents and Norms: How to fill the gap?”, Arificial Intelligence and Law, 7: 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dosi G., Marengo L., Bassanini A., Valente M., 1999, “Norms as emergent properties of adaptive learning: The case of economic routines”, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 9: 5–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elder G.H. Jr., 1992, “Life Course”, in Borgatta E.F., Borgatta M.L. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Sociology, New York, Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster J., 1989, The Cement of Society. A Study of Social Order, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Freund A.M., 1997, “Individuating Age Salience: A Psychological Perspective on the Salience of Age in the Life Course”, Human Development, 40: 287–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens A., 1984, The constitution of society, Oxford, Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giele J.Z., Elder G.H. Jr. (Eds.), 1998, Methods of Life Course Research. Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert N., Troitzsch K.G., 1999, Simulation for the Social Scientist, Buckingham-Philadelphia, Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckhausen J., 1999, Developmental Regulation in Adulthood. Age-Normative and Sociostructural Constraints as Adaptive Challenges, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedström P., Swedberg R. (Eds.) 1998, Social Mechanisms. An Analytical Approach to Social Theory, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence B.S., 1996, “Organizational Age Norms: Why Is It So Hard To Know One When You See One?”, The Gerontologist, 36: 209–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leibenstein H., 1981, “Economic decision theory and human fertility behavior: a speculative essay”, Population and Development Review, 7: 381–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesthaeghe R., 1983, “A Century of Demographic and Cultural Change in Western Europe: An Exploration of Underlying Dimensions”, Population and Development Review, 9: 411–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesthaeghe R., Moors G., 1995, “Expliquer la diversité des formes familiales et domestiques: théories économiques ou dimensions culturelles”, Population, 6: 1503–1526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modell J., 1997, “What Do Life-Course Norms Mean?”, Human Development, 40: 282–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulder C., Wagner M., 1993, “Migration and Marriage in the Life Course: a Method for Studying Synchronised Events”, European Journal of Population, 9: 55–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheim Mason K., 1983, “Norms Relating to the Desire for Children”, in Bulatao R.A., Lee R.D. (Eds.), Determinants of Fertility in Developing Countries, Vol. 1., New York, Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley M.W., Johnson M.E., Foner A. (Eds.), 1972, Aging and society: A sociology of age stratification, Vol. 3, New York, Russel Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rositi F., 1986, “Tipi e dimensioni dei sistemi normativi”, Rassegna Italiana di Sociologia, 27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saam N.J., Harrer A., 1999, “Simulating Norms, Social Inequality, and Functional Change in Artificial Societies”, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 2, 1, <http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/JASSS/2/1/2.html>.

    Google Scholar 

  • Settersten R.A., Hägestad G.O., 1996, “What’s the Latest? Cultural Age Deadlines for Family Transitions”, The Gerontologist, 36, 2: 178–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Settersten R.A., Mayer K.U., 1997, “The Measurement of Age, Age Structuring and the Life Course”, Annual Review of Sociology, 23: 233–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sumner W. G., 1906, Folkways, New Haven, Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teitler J.O., 1996, The impact of neighborhood norms on youth sexual and fertility behavior, Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation,, Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • White H.C., 1992, Identity and control A structural theory of social action, Princeton, Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Billari, F.C., Micheli, G.A. (2001). Social Norms on Agents’ Demographic Events. In: Conte, R., Dellarocas, C. (eds) Social Order in Multiagent Systems. Multiagent Systems, Artificial Societies, and Simulated Organizations, vol 2. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1555-5_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1555-5_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5612-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-1555-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics