Abstract
The argument so far has been that, in order to avoid the grand circularities and teleologies of much of the theorizing and systems-building during the development of the social sciences, a notion of human nature has to be developed. This is to give a social science a basis in reality — in biology and evolutionary theory — rather than simply being based on un-substantiated enlightenment-inspired notions of direction, purpose and progress. The model of human nature which we require must, in other words, not only remain consistent with the purposeless and directionless nature of Darwinian principles of evolution, but also incorporate an understanding of the amoral principles of genetics and the bio-electrics of current neural sciences. It must be a human nature which is not just a black box out of which magically spring all the ingredients for humanness — be they goodness, perfectibility and potential happiness or, conversely, evilness, imperfection and misery. It has to be a human nature that can realistically be seen to contain motivators of human behaviour, for better or for worse.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vannelli, R. (2001). Human Nature and Social Propensities. In: Evolutionary Theory and Human Nature. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1545-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1545-6_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5607-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-1545-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive