Advertisement

Agricultural and Trade Policy under Administrative Water Regimes

  • Charles B. Moss
  • Chris de Bodisco
Chapter
  • 131 Downloads
Part of the Natural Resource Management and Policy book series (NRMP, volume 20)

Abstract

Urban growth in Florida over the past twenty-five years has been nothing short of spectacular. In 1975, Florida was the ninth largest state in the nation with a population of 2 million people. By 1996, the population in Florida had risen to 12 million people—the fourth most populous state in the nation. This growth has led to resource conflicts between urban demands and Florida’s traditional agricultural economy, particularly where land and water are concerned. Between 1970 and 1995, freshwater withdrawals for public supply increased by 134 percent, while self-supplied withdrawals for agriculture increased 54 percent (Marella, 1995). The conflict between agriculture and urbanization in the state is complicated by recent changes in agricultural and trade policy. Specifically, agriculture’s water use tends to be dominated by the state’s high-valued crops that compete with imports. In addition, dominant crops in north Florida are heavily reliant on traditional commodity programs. Hence, the changes implicit in the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the 1996 Federal Agriculture Improvement and Reform Act (FAIR) may have significant ramifications for both cropping patterns and water use in Florida. Given the history of water-management in Florida, the emerging conflicts between agricultural and urban-water use will likely be resolved less through markets or courts and more through a unique regulatory environment under administrative law.

Keywords

Trade Policy Shadow Price Profit Function Output Price North American Free Trade Agreement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Carriker, R.R. 1988. “State Water Management Policy: The Florida Experience,” in G.M. Johnston, D. Freshwater, and P. Favero, eds., Natural Resource and Environmental Policy Analysis: Cases in Applied Economies. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  2. Chambers, R.G. and U. Vasavada. 1983. “Testing Asset Fixity For United States Agriculture.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 65: 761–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cover, T.M. and J. A. Thomas. 1991. Elements of Information Theory. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Marella, R.L. 1995. Water Withdrawals, Use and Trends in Florida, 1995. Water Resources Investigations Report 99–4002. United States Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, Tallahassee, Florida.Google Scholar
  5. Moss, C.B. and C. de Bodisco. 1998. Historical Agricultural Water Use in the Northwest Florida Water Management District, 1975–1995. Grant Report to the Northwest Florida Water Management District, Havana, Florida.Google Scholar
  6. Moss, C.B., A.M. Featherstone, and T.G. Baker. 1987. “Agricultural Assets in an Efficient Multi-period Investment Portfolio.” Agricultural Finance Review 47: 82–94.Google Scholar
  7. Schmitz, T.G., A. Schmitz, and C. Dumas. 1997. “Gains from Trade, Inefficiency of Government Programs, and the Net Economic Effects of Trading.” Journal of Political Economy (April): 637–648.Google Scholar
  8. Shannon, C.E. 1949. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana, IL: The University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  9. Smajstrla, A.G., F.S. Zazueta, and D.Z. Haman. 1988. “Center Pivot Irrigation Systems and Applications in Florida.” Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Circular 804, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida (June).Google Scholar
  10. Taylor, T. 1990. “A Test of Asset Fixity in Southeastern U.S. Agriculture.” Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics 22: 105–111.Google Scholar
  11. Theil, H. Economics and Information Theory. 1967. Amsterdam, Netherlands: North-Holland Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  12. Thompson, G.T., L.B. Spiess, and J.N. Krider. 1980. “Farm Resources and System Selection,” in M.E. Jensen, ed., pp. 45–58. Design and Operation of Farm Irrigation Systems. ASAE Monograph 3, St. Joseph, Michigan.Google Scholar
  13. USDA. (United States Department of Agriculture). 1999. Internet website:http://www.mannlib.cornell.edu70
  14. USDA/ERS (U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service). 1998. Crops County Data. Washington, DC: USDA/ERS.Google Scholar
  15. USDA/ERS (U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service). 1998. Prices Received by Farmers. Washington, DC: USDA/ERS.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charles B. Moss
    • 1
    • 2
  • Chris de Bodisco
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.University of FloridaUSA
  2. 2.Vanderbilt UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations