Advertisement

The Identification and Classification of Genetically Modified Organisms: Implications for Trade

  • Richard Gray
  • Jill E. Hobbs
  • Faycal Haggui
Chapter
  • 140 Downloads
Part of the Natural Resource Management and Policy book series (NRMP, volume 20)

Abstract

The development, licensing, and production of products containing genetically modified organisms (GMOs) have recently become the center of some controversy. Those strongly opposed to genetically modified (GM) products argue that the genetic modification process is unnatural and could result in life forms that are dangerous to the ecosystem and to human health. At the other end of the spectrum there are those who believe that GMOs pose no additional risk and offer a great deal of potential for improvements in the production of food. This controversy has spilled over into the international trade arena, leading to different approaches to the development, licensing, and regulation of GMOs.

Keywords

Genetically Modify Market Failure Genetically Modify Crop Negative Externality Positive Externality 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adam, K.D. and W.H. Köhler. 1996. “Evolutionary Genetic Considerations on the Goals and Risks in Releasing Transgenic Crops,” in Wöhrmann, K., Tomiuk, J. and Sentker, A., eds. Transgenic Organisms—Biological and Social Implications, Basel, Switzerland: Birkhaüser Verlag.Google Scholar
  2. Akerlof, G.A. 1970. “The Market for ‘Lemons’: Quality, Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 84: 488–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baumol, W.J. and W.E. Oates. 1988. The Theory of Environmental Policy, 2 nd Ed. Cambridge, MA: University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. BioDemocracy and Organic Consumers Association. 1999. Internet website: http://www.purefood.org/gelink.html <http://www.purefood.org/gelink.html>
  5. Blythman, J. 1999. “We don’t believe our food is safe.” Internet website: http://www.millennium-debate.org/indsun6june6.htm.Google Scholar
  6. Burros, M. 1997. The New York Times. Internet website: http://www.purefood.org/whole.html.Google Scholar
  7. Butler, D. and T. Reichhardt. 1999. “Long-term Effect of GM Crops Serves up Food for Thought.” Nature 398 (6729, April 22): 651–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Caswell, J. 1999. “An Evaluation of Risk Analysis as Applied to Agricultural Biotechnology (with a Case Study of GMO Labeling),” in Lesser, W.H., ed., pp. 665–674, Transitions in Agbiotech: Economics of Strategy and Policy. Food Marketing Policy Center, University of Connecticut. Storrs, CT.Google Scholar
  9. Caswell, J. 1996. Valuing Food Safety and Nutrition. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  10. Cavadini, C., C. Hertel, and W.P. Hammes. 1998. “Application of lysostaphin-producing Lactobacilli to Control Staphylococcal Food Poisoning in Meat Products.” Journal of Food Protein 61 (4, April): 419–424.Google Scholar
  11. Chess, C. 1998. “Fearing Fear: Communication About Agricultural Biotechnology.” Agbioforum 1 (1, Summer). Available online: http://www.agbioforum.missouri.edu
  12. Citizens Panel. 1999. Designer Genes at the Dinner Table: Citizens’ Conference on Food Biotechnology. Final report. Calgary, AB: University of Calgary (7 March).Google Scholar
  13. Clark, E.A. 1999. “Debunking the Myths of Genetic Engineering in Field Crops.” Internet website: http://www.oac.uoguelph.ca/CRCS/faculty/eac.myths.htm Google Scholar
  14. Coase, R.H. 1960. “The Problem of Social Cost.” Journal of Law and Economics 3 (October): 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Consumers International. 1999. Summary of Consumer Surveys Related to Labeling of Foods Produced Using Biotechnology. Internet website: http://www.oneworld.org/consumers/campaigns/biotech/surveys.html Google Scholar
  16. Cook, R.J., W.L. Bruckart, J.R. Coulson, M.S. Goettel, R.A. Humber, R.D. Lumsden, J.V. Maddox, M.L. McManus, L. Moore, and S.F. Meyer. 1996. “Safety of Microorganisms intended for Pest and Plant Disease Control: A Framework for Scientific Evaluation.” Biological Control 7 (3 December): 333–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Darby, M.R. and E. Kami. 1973. “Free Competition and the Optimal Amount of Fraud.” Journal of Law and Economics 16 (1): 67–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. De-Leij, F.A.A.M., M.J. Bailey, J.M. Whipps, I.P. Thompson, P.A. Bramwell, and J.M. Lynch. 1998. “Release of Genetically Modified Micro-organisms and Biomonitoring” (Biotechnology Research Series; Volume 7), in Environmental Biomonitoring, the Biotechnology Ecotoxicology Interface, J.M. Lynch, ed., pp. 70–100. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Dunwell, J.M. 1998. “Novel Food Products from Genetically Modified Crop Plants: Methods and Future Prospects.” International Journal of Food Science Technology 33 (3 June): 205–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Economic Research Service (ERS). 1999. Genetically Engineered Crops for Pest Management. United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC (25 June). Internet website: http://www.econ.ag.gov.whatsnew/issues/biotech Google Scholar
  21. Flint, H.J.; A. Chesson. 1999. “Safety Implications of Genetically Modified Organisms.” Feed-mix, Doetinchem 7 (3): 3235.Google Scholar
  22. Frewer, L.J., C. Howard, and J.I. Aaron. 1998. “Consumer Acceptance of Transgenic Crops.” Pesticide Science 52 (April): 388–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Froyd, J.D. 1997. “Can Synthetic Pesticides be Replaced with Biologically Based Alternatives?: An Industry Perspective.” Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology 19 (3): 192–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gaisford, J. and M. Plunkett. 2000. “Limiting Biotechnology? Information Problems and Policy Responses.” Current Agriculture, Food and Resource Issues 1: 21–28.Google Scholar
  25. Gath, M. and V.A. Reimar. 1998. “The Potential Effects of Labeling GM Foods on the Consumer Decisions—Preliminary Results of Conjoint Measurement Experiments in Germany.” Ar Norwegen 4 (3): 18–28.Google Scholar
  26. Gendel, S.M. 1998. “The Use of Amino Acid Sequence Alignments to Assess Potential Aller-genicity of Proteins Used in Genetically Modified Foods.” Advanced Food Nutrition Research 42: 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Giddings, G.D., N.R. Sackville-Hamilton, and M.D. Hayward. 1997a. “The Release of Genetically Modified Grasses, 2, The influence of Wind Direction on Pollen Dispersal.” Theoretical and Applied Genetics 94 (8): 1007–1014 (June).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Giddings, G.D., N.R. Sackville-Hamilton, and M.D. Hayward. (1997b). “The Release of Genetically Modified Grasses, 1, Pollen Dispersal to Traps in Lolium perenne.” Theoretical and Applied Genetics 94 (8 June): 1000–1006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gilbert, S. 1999. The New York Times. Internet website: http://www.purefood.org/monlink.htm Google Scholar
  30. Gray, R. and S. Malla. 2001. “The Evaluation of the Economic and External Health Benefits from Canola Research,” in J.M. Alston, P.G. Pardey, and M.J. Taylor, eds., pp. 211–240, Agricultural Science Policy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Hauser, T.P., R.B. Jorgensen, and H. Ostergard. 1998. “Fitness of Backcross and F2 Hybrids Between Weedy Brassica rapa and Oilseed Rape (B. napus).” Heredity. 81 (4): 436–443 (October).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Heap, I.M. 1999. “International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds.” Internet website (February): http://www.weedscience.com.Google Scholar
  33. Herrman, T. and M. Boland. 1999. “Segregation Strategies.” Feed and Grain. February/March: 20–24.Google Scholar
  34. Hoban, T. 1998. “Trends in Consumer Attitudes About Biotechnology.” Agbioforum 1(1) (Summer). Internet website: http://www.agbioforum.missouri.edu
  35. Hobbs, J.E. 2000. “Consumer Issues and Labeling in International Trade.” Paper presented at the Globalization and New Agricultural Trade Rules for the 21 st Century Conference, Canadian Agri-Food Trade Research Network, Saskatoon, Canada (February).Google Scholar
  36. Hobbs, J.E. and M.D. Plunkett. 1999. “Genetically Modified Foods: Consumer Issues and the Role of Information Asymmetry.” Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 47 (4): 445–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hoef, A.M.A. van, E.J. Kok, E. Bouw, H.A. Kuiper, and J. Keijer. 1998. “Development and Application of a Selective Detection Method for Genetically Modified Soy and Soy-derived Products.” Food Additive Contamination 15 (7): 767–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Holt, J.S. and H.M. LeBaron. 1990. “Significance and Distribution of Herbicide Resistance.” Weed Technology 4: 141–149.Google Scholar
  39. Hurburgh, C. R., Jr. 1994. “Identification and Segregation of High-Value Soybeans at a Country Elevator.” Journal of American Oil Chemists Society 71 (10): 1073–1078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kappeli, O. and L. Auberson. 1998. “How Safe is Safe Enough in Plant Genetic Engineering.” Trends in Plant Science 3(7): 276–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kappeli, O. and L. Auberson. 1997. “The Science and Intricacy of Environmental Safety Evaluations.” Trends in Biotechnology 9 (September 15): 342–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Klein, K.K., W.A. Kerr, and J.E. Hobbs. 1998. “The Impact of Biotechnology on Agricultural Markets.” Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 46(4): 441–453 (December).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Liu, K. 1999. “Biotech Crops: Products, Properties, and Prospects.” Food Technology 53 (5): 42–49.Google Scholar
  44. Mann, C.C. 1999. “Biotech. Goes Wild.” Technology Review July/August: 37–43.Google Scholar
  45. Mooney, S. and K.K. Klein. 1999. “Environmental Concerns and Risks of Genetically Modified Crops: Economic Contributions to the Debate.” Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 41 (4): 437–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Nelson, P. 1970. “Information and Consumer Research.” Journal of Political Economy 78(2): 311–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nickson, T.E. and M.J. McKee. 1999. “Risk Assessment of Genetically Modified Plant Products.” Proceedings of the Western Society of Weed Science 52: 6–9.Google Scholar
  48. Nielsen, K.M., A.M. Bones, K. Smalla, and J.D. van Elsas. 1999. “Horizontal Gene Transfer from Transgenic Plants to Terrestrial Bacteria—A Rare Event.” FEMS-Microbiology Review 22 (2): 79–103.Google Scholar
  49. Perdikis, N, W. A. Kerr, and J.E. Hobbs. 2000. “Can the WTO/GATT Agreements on Sanitary and Phyto-Sanitary Measures and Technical Barriers to Trade Be Renegotiated to Accommodate Agricultural Biotechnology?” in W.H. Lesser, ed., pp. 692–707, Transitions in Agbiotech: Economics of Strategy and Policy. Food Marketing Policy Center, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.Google Scholar
  50. Persley, G. and J.N. Siedow. 1999. “Applications of Biotechnology to Crops: Benefits and Risks.” Internet website: http://www.cast-science.org/biotc_ip.htm <http://www.cast-science.org/biotc_ip.htm.Google Scholar
  51. Pesticide and Toxic Chemical News. 1998. Internet website: http://www.purefood.org/ge/aaasge.htm.
  52. Rissler, J. 1999. “Biotechnology and Pest Control: Quick Fix versus Sustainable Control.” Internet website: http://www.netspeed.com.au/cogs/gen2.htm.
  53. Rissler, J. and M. Mellon. 1996. The Ecological Risks of Transgenic Crops. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  54. Saat, T.A.W.M. 1996. “Out in the Open: Field Trials with Genetically Modified Crop Plants in Four European Countries, Chile and the United States,” in E.R. Schmidt and T. Hankeln, eds. Transgenic Organisms and Biosafety: Horizontal Gene Transfer, Stability of DNA, and Expression of Transgenes. New York, NY: Springer-VerlagGoogle Scholar
  55. Simon, H. 1961. Administrative Behavior. 2 nd Ed. New York, NY: Macmillan, Inc.Google Scholar
  56. Smyth, S. and P. Phillips. 1999. “Competitors Cooperating: Establishing a Supply Chain to Manage Genetically Modified Canola.” Paper presented at the Economics of Quality Control in Agriculture Conference, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada (December).Google Scholar
  57. Symonds, B.K. 1999. “Healthier, Nutritious Foods to Come From Biotech Grains.” Feedstuffs 71 (16): 12–13.Google Scholar
  58. Tabashnik, B.E. 1994. “Evolution of Resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis.” Annual Review of Entomology 39: 47–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tjaden, T. 1997. “Beekeepers Buzzing Over Pollen Fears.” The Western Producer (29 May: 23).Google Scholar
  60. USDA/ERS (U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service). 1999. Internet website: http://www.ers.usda.gov/
  61. Vandeburg, J.M., J.R. Fulton, F.J. Dooley, and P.V. Preckel. 2000. “Impact of Identity Preservation of Non-GMO Crops on the Grain Market System.” Current Agriculture, Food, and Resource Issues 1: 29–36.Google Scholar
  62. Varian, H.R. 1984. Microeconomic Analysis, 2 nd Ed. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  63. Walsh, J. 1999. “Ready or Not, Genetically Modified Foods are Here to Stay.” Environmental Nutrition 22 (4): 1–6.Google Scholar
  64. Western Producer. 1999. “Senate Considers Hearings on GMO Issue.” Internet website: http://www.producer/articles/1991007/news/19991007news04.html Google Scholar
  65. Western Producer. 2000. “Triple-resistant Canola Weeds Found in Alberta” (10 February: 1).Google Scholar
  66. Williamson, O.E. 1979. “Transaction Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations.” Journal of Law and Economics 22: 233–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard Gray
    • 1
  • Jill E. Hobbs
    • 1
  • Faycal Haggui
    • 1
  1. 1.University of SaskatchewanCanada

Personalised recommendations