Advertisement

The Impact of Food Industry Globalization on Agricultural Trade Policy

  • Tim Josling
Chapter
Part of the Natural Resource Management and Policy book series (NRMP, volume 20)

Abstract

It has long been an oddity that the food industry has been so quiet when it comes to influencing agricultural policy. Of course, some industry groups have made their position known on certain aspects of agricultural legislation, but, in general, the agri-food processing sector and the distribution sector have not exerted a major influence on policy. Academic interests have reflected this reality; the vast majority of analytical treatments of the politics of agricultural policy and agricultural trade have focussed on the influence of the farm lobby and their supporters in legislatures. Conventional wisdom considers consumer interests weak and diffused, and, hence, they have rarely received much political attention. Farm policy anomalies, such as the fact that massive transfers are made to relatively few small businesses from consumers or taxpayers, are explained in terms of the over-representation of the rural vote, the identification of political interest with production rather than consumption activities, or public sympathy for what is perceived as a poor and backward sector.

Keywords

Supply Chain Foreign Direct Investment Market Power World Trade Organization Trade Policy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barton, J. 1996. “Biotechnology, the Environment, and International Agricultural Trade.” The Georgetown International Environmental Law Review 9(95): 126–141.Google Scholar
  2. Beers, G., A. Beulens, and J. van Dalen. 1998. “Chain Science as an Emerging Discipline.” Paper presented to the Third International Conference on Chain Management, Wageningen, Netherlands (28–29 May).Google Scholar
  3. Bureau, J.C., S. Marette, and A. Schiavina. 1997. Non-Tariff Trade Barriers and Consumers’ Information: The Case of E.U.-U.S. Trade Disputes on Food Products. Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Department d’Economie, Unité de Grignon (July).Google Scholar
  4. Cotterill, R.W. 1999. “Food Industry Consolidation: The Uncharted Global Venture.” Food Marketing Policy Center Newsletter, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT (April). The Economist. 1999. “In the Mill.” Staff paper. (20 March: 64–65).Google Scholar
  5. European Commission. 1997. The General Principles of Food Law in the European Union, (Green Paper). COM(97): 176 (3 December)Google Scholar
  6. FDA (Food and Drug Administration). 1997. Food Safety from Farm to Table: A National Food Safety Initiative. Report to U.S. President Clinton, Washington, DC: FDA (May).Google Scholar
  7. Grant, W. 1999. “Biotechnology: A Source of Tensions in the U.S.-EU Trade Relations” (unpublished).Google Scholar
  8. Financial Times. 1999. “FT 500.” Staff report (28 February).Google Scholar
  9. Henderson, D.R., C.R. Handy, and S.A. Neff, ed. 1996. Globalization of the Processed Foods Market, Agricultural Economic Report No. 742. Washington, DC: USDA/ERS.Google Scholar
  10. Hughes, D., ed. 1993. Breaking with Tradition: Building Partnerships and Alliances in the European Food Industry. Wye, UK: Wye College Press.Google Scholar
  11. Josling, T. 1998. Agricultural Trade Policy: Completing the Reform. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics (April).Google Scholar
  12. Kalaitzandonakes, N. and R. Maltsbarger. 1998. “Biotechnology and Identity-preserved Supply Chains.” Choices (Fourth Quarter): 15–18.Google Scholar
  13. MacLaren, D. and T. Josling. 1999. “Competition Policy and International Agricultural Trade.” (unpublished)Google Scholar
  14. Mander, J. and E. Goldsmith, eds. 1998. The Case Against the Global Economy. San Francisco, CA: Sierra Club Books.Google Scholar
  15. Marsh, J. 1998. “The Economics of New Technology,” in Global Agribusiness, Premier Issue (December).Google Scholar
  16. MAFF (Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries, and Food). 1998. The Food Standards Agency: A Force for Change. Washington, DC: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  17. Roberts, D., T.E. Josling, and D. Orden. 1999. A Framework for Analyzing Technical Trade Barriers in Agricultural Markets, Technical Bulletin No. 1876, USDA/ERS, Washington DC (March).Google Scholar
  18. Schnittker, J.A. 1998. “An Agricultural Revolution with Implications for Sustainability.” Choices (Fourth Quarter).Google Scholar
  19. USDA (U.S. Department of Agriculture). 1997. The Food Safety Enforcement Enhancement Act of 1997. Washington, DC: USDA.Google Scholar
  20. Urban, T.N. 1998. “Beyond Industrialization: The Prescription Food System.” Choices (Fourth Quarter): 43–44.Google Scholar
  21. WTO (World Trade Organization). 1995. The Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations: The Legal Texts. Geneva, Switzerland: WTO.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tim Josling
    • 1
  1. 1.Stanford UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations