Skip to main content

The importance of multi-scale analyses in avian habitat selection studies in urban environments

  • Chapter
Avian Ecology and Conservation in an Urbanizing World

Abstract

We have a limited understanding of how birds respond to different scales of urban landscape structure. Such information is important to concerned homeowners, developers, and city planners because each need to know whether the scale at which they manipulate the landscape will appreciably reduce or attract certain avian species. Often in urban habitat selection studies, one arbitrary scale is chosen to correlate habitat structure to avian abundance, composition, and/or distribution. This scale may or may not reflect the primary scale at which species respond to landscape structure. In this paper, I (1) give a hierarchical perspective on how birds may select habitat from limited to broad scales, (2) describe a multi-scale analysis to determine the broad scales at which birds respond to landscape structure, and (3) discuss why multi-scale studies will ultimately help urban wildlife managers evaluate the scales at which a landscape design is most effective at attracting various species. A connection exists between the scales at which birds respond to landscape structure and the scales at which humans impact urban areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allen, T. F. H., and T. B. Starr. 1982. Hierarchy: perspectives for ecological complexity. University of Chicago Press, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, R. B. 1996. Land-use and avian species diversity along an urban gradient. Ecol. Appl. 6:506–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury, R. H., and R. E. Reichelt. 1983. Fractal dimension of a coral reef at ecological scales. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 10:169–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brawn, J. and D. Stotz. 2001. The importance of the Chicago region and the Chicago Wilderness initiative for avian conservation, p. 511–524. In J. M. Marzluff, R. Bowman, and R. Donnelly [EDS.], Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Kluwer Academic, Norwell, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. H. 1995. Macroecology. University of Chicago Press, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Degraaf, R. M., and J. M. Wentworth. 1981. Urban bird communities and habitats in New England. Forty-sixth N. Amer. Wildl. Conf.:396–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emlen, J. T. 1974. An urban bird community in Tucson Arizona: derivation, structure, regulation. Condor 76:184–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freemark, K., and B. Collins. 1992. Landscape ecology of birds breeding in temperate forest fragments, p.443–454. In J. M. I. Hagan and D. W. Johnston [EDS.], Ecology and conservation of neotropical migrant landbirds. Smith. Inst. Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Germaine, S. S., S. S. Rosenstock, R. E. Schweinsburg, and W. S. Richardson. 1998. Relationships among breeding birds, habitat, and residential development in greater Tucson, Arizona. Ecol. Appl. 8:680–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, J. P., and J. Faaborg. 1990. Estimating the viability of ovenbird and Kentucky warbler populations in forest fragments. Conserv. Biol. 4:193–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gober, P. 1998. The demographics of urban growth in Phoenix, p.30–36. In R. Melnick [ED.], Growth in Arizona: the machine in the garden. Morrison Institute for Public Policy, Tempe, AZ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harestad, A. S., and F. L. Bunnell. 1979. Home range and body weight - a reevaluation. Ecology 60:389–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, R. L. 1992. Toward a theory of inter-refuge corridor design. Conserv. Biol. 6: 293–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C. S. 1986. Resilience of ecosystems; local surprise and global change, p.292–317. In W. C. Clark and R. E. Munn [EDS.], Sustainable development of the biosphere. Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C. S. 1992. Cross-scale morphology, geometry and dynamics of ecosystems. Ecol. Monogr. 62:447–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoover, J. P., Brittingham, M. C. and L. J. Goodrich. 1995. Effect of forest patch size on nesting success of Wood Thrushes. Auk 112:146–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horak, G. C. 1986. Cumulative impacts of rapid urbanization on winter avian diversity in Northeastern Colorado. Ph.D. diss., Colorado State University, Ft. Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hostetler, M. E. 1997. Avian body-size clumps and the response of birds to scale-dependent landscape structure in suburban habitats. Ph.D. diss., University of Florida, Gainesville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hostetler, M. E. 1999. Scale, birds, and human decisions: a potential for integrative research in urban ecosystems. Landscape and Urban Plann. 45:15–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hostetler, M. E., and C. S. Holling. 2000. Detecting the scales at which birds respond to structure in urban landscapes. Urban Ecosys. 4:25–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutto, R. L. 1985. Habitat selection by nonbreeding landbirds, p.455–476. In M. L. Cody [ED.], Habitat selection in birds. Academic Press Inc., New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. H. 1980. The comparison of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource preference. Ecology 61:65–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kent, C, and J. Wong. 1982. An index of littoral zone complexity and measurement. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 39: 847–853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotliar, N. B., and J. A. Wiens. 1990. Multiple scales of patchiness and patch structure: a hierarchical framework for the study of heterogeneity. Oikos 59:253–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, S. L. 1992. The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 73:1943–1967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lima, S. L., and P. A. Zollner. 1996. Towards a behavioral ecology of ecological landscapes. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11:131–135.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marzluff, J. M. 2001. Worldwide increase in urbanization and its effects on birds, p. 19–47. In M. Marzluff, R. Bowman, and R. Donnelly [EDS.], Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Kluwer Academic, Norwell, MA.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J., J. Fraterrigo, J. Wiens, and T. Hobbs. 2001. Urbanization, avian communities, and landscape ecology, p. 117–137. In M. Marzluff, R. Bowman, and R. Donnelly [EDS.], Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Kluwer Academic, Norwell, MA.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, G. S., J. B. J. Dunning, and J. M. Bates. 1989. Effects of urbanization on breeding bird community structure in southwestern desert habitats. Condor 91:416–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, F. R., and T. R. Simons. 1992. Habitat suitability and the stopover ecology of neotropical landbird migrants, p. 345–355. In J. M. Hagan III and D. W. Johnston [EDS.], Ecology and conservation of neotropical migrant landbirds. Smith. Inst. Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilon, C. H., C. N. Long, and W. C. Zipperer. 1995. Effects of wildland development on forest bird communities. Landscape and Urban Plann. 32:81–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, R. V., D. L. DeAngelis, J. B. Waide, and T. F. H. Allen. 1986. A hierarchical concept of ecosystems. Princeton University Press, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opdam, P. 1991. Metapopulation theory and habitat fragmentation: a review of holarctic breeding bird studies. Landscape Ecol. 5: 93–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penland, S. T. 1984. Avian responses to a gradient of urbanization in Seattle. Washington. Ph.D. diss., University of Washington, Seattle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, H. R. 1996. Land-use policy for 21st century America: the conceptual basis of reform. Eugene V. and Clare E. Thaw Charitable Trust, Orlando, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, C. S., Dawson, D. K., and B. A. Dowell. 1989. Habitat area requirements of breeding forest birds of the middle atlantic states. Wildlife Monographs 103:1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute. 1994. A step-by-step approach to using the SAS system. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener, T. W. 1968. Sizes of feeding territories among birds. Ecology 49:123–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sexton, C. W. 1987. A comparative analysis of urban and native bird populations in Central Texas. Ph.D. diss., University of Texas, Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Towne, M. 1994. Open space conservation in urban environments: lessons from Congo Valley, California. National symposium on urban wildlife, Bellevue, WA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walcott, C. 1974. Changes in bird life in Cambridge, MA, from 1860 to 1964. Auk 91:151–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiens, J. A. 1976. Population responses to patchy environments. Annu. Rev. Ecol. and Syst. 7:81–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiens, J. A. 1989. The ecology of bird communities: Foundations and patterns. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wiens, J. A. 1990. On the use of'grain’ and ‘grain size’ in ecology. Funct. Ecol. 3:385–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens, J. A. 1995. Habitat fragmentation: island vs. landscape perspectives on bird conservation. Ibis Suppl. S97–S104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens, J. A., N. C. Stenseth, B. Van Home, and R. A. Ims. 1993. Ecological mechanisms and landscape ecology. Oikos 66:369–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • With, K. A. 1994. Using fractal analysis to assess how species perceive landscape structure. Landscape Ecol. 9:5–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolfenden, G., and S. Rohwer. 1969. Breeding birds in a Florida suburb. FL. State Mus.Bull. No. 13

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hostetler, M. (2001). The importance of multi-scale analyses in avian habitat selection studies in urban environments. In: Marzluff, J.M., Bowman, R., Donnelly, R. (eds) Avian Ecology and Conservation in an Urbanizing World. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1531-9_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1531-9_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5600-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-1531-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics