Skip to main content

Human perception and appreciation of birds: A motivation for wildlife conservation in urban environments of France

  • Chapter
Avian Ecology and Conservation in an Urbanizing World

Abstract

Conservation of biodiversity in urban areas needs both scientific justification and public interest. However, data about the public’s perception of urban wildlife is scarce in Western Europe. To identify human perception and appreciation of urban wildlife, we studied avian communities and the public’s perceptions about birds in general, in Rennes, France, at four sectors along a gradient of decreasing urbanization: urban, and adjoining suburban, distant suburban and rural sectors. The diversity and density of birds were analyzed in Rennes during winter and spring (6 censuses). Avian diversity was highest in the distant suburban sector and lowest in urban areas. In the two intermediate sectors (adjoining and distant suburban), diversity was similar and varied little between seasons (Rennes has a relatively temperate climate). The density of birds was highest in urban areas because of the abundance of some species, including Rock Doves (Columba livia) and Swifts (Apus apus) and lowest in the rural sector. Sociological analyses of surveys conducted in Rennes (200 questionnaires) showed that human perception of birds varied with the sector of respondents. Urban dwellers perceived the different bird species (more diversity than density) and appreciated their presence, except for some species, such as Herring Gulls Larus argentatus or European Starlings Sturnus vulgaris. According to our results, efforts to increase or maintain avian biodiversity in cities appears to be justified in terms the perceived benefit to humans, both in terms of the perceived environmental and personal benefits to humans. However, when a species must be managed (e.g. roosting European Starlings), different attitudes by the public in different parts of the city may require different styles of communicating management objectives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adams, L.W. 1994. Urban wildlife habitats, a landscape perspective. Univ. of Minnesota Press, MN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alberti, M., E. Botsford, and A. Cohen. 2001. Quantifying the urban gradient: linking urban planning and ecology. In J. M. Marzluff, R. Bowman, and R. Donnelly [EDS.], Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Kluwer Academic, Norwell, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allain, R. 1992. La maison et la ville en Bretagne. Ph.D. Thesis of Univ. Rennes2, Rennes, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allain, R., and G. Baudelle. 1991. La structure résidentielle de Rennes. Géographie sociale 11:431–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, R. B. 1996. Land use and avian species diversity along an urban gradient. Ecol. Appl. 6: 506–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T., D. Dawson, and R. Miller. 1979. Interests and attitudes of metropolitan New York residents about wildlife. Trans. North Am. Wildl. Nat. Resour. Conf. 44:289–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clergeau, P. 1995. De nouveaux oiseaux dans la ville? Colonisation des zones urbaines par les étourneaux. Report Ministère de l’Environnement/Ministère du Logement, Paris, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clergeau, P. 1996. Urban biodiversity: is there such a thing? Le courrier du CNRS, special issue Cities- Habitat II Istanbul, CNRS ed., Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clergeau, P. 1997. Oiseaux à risques en ville et en campagne; vers une gestion intégrée des populations. INRA ed., Paris, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clergeau, P., D. Esterlingot, J. Chaperon, and C. Lerat. 1996. Difficultés de cohabitation entre ľhomme et ľanimal: le cas des concentrations ďoiseaux en site urbain. Natures, Sciences, Sociétés 4:102–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clergeau, P., J. P. L. Savard, G. Mennechez, and G. Fallardeau. 1998. Bird abundance and diversity along an urban-rural gradient: a comparative study between two cities on different continents. Condor 100:413–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Congress of Leicester. 1995. Recent advances in urban and post-industrial wildlife conservation and habitat creation. Land Contamination and Reclamation 3:59–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Congress of Starsbourg. 1994. Vers une gestion raisonnée des espaces verts. Le Centre National de la Fonction Publique ed., Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conover, M. R. 1997. Wildlife management by metropolitan residents in the United States: practices, perceptions, costs and values. Wildl Soc. Bull. 25:306–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, A. M., and T. F. Glick. 1978 Urban ecosystems and island biogeography. Environ. Conserv. 5:299–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dagg, A. I. 1970. Wildlife in an urban area. Nature Can. 97: 201–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erz, W. 1966. Ecological principles in the urbanization of birds. Ostrich Suppl. 6: 357–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabos, J. G., and J. Ahern. 1996. Greenways, the beginning of an international movement. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furness, R. W., and J. J. D. Greenwood. 1993. Birds as monitors of environmental change. Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, O. 1989. The ecology of urban habitats. Chapman and Hall, London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Guégan-Roué, A. 1994. La dynamique spatiale de ľagglomération rennaise: la télédétection comme outil ďanalyse et de gestion de ľespace. Ph.D. Thesis of Univ. Rennes2, Rennes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haag, D. 1993. Street pigeons in Basel. Nature 361:200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haskell, D. G., A. M. Knupp, and M. C. Schneider. 2001. Nest predator abundance and urbanization, p. 245–260. In J. M. Marzluff, R. Bowman, and R. Donnelly [EDS], Avian ecology and conservation in and Urbanizing World. Kluwer Academic Press, Norwell, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, J. 1994. The social construction of precaution, p. 117–125. In O’Riordan, T., and J. Cameron [EDS.], Interpreting the precaution principle. Earthscan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilyichev V. D., V. M Konstantinov, and B. M. Zvonov. 1990. The urbanized landscape as an arena for mutual relations between man and birds, p. 122–130. In M. Luniak [ED.], Proceedings of international symposium on urban ecological studies in central and eastern Europe. Pol. Acad. Sci., Warszawa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R. F. 2001. Synanthropic birds of North America, p. 49–67. In J. M. Marzluff, R. Bowman, and R. Donnelly [EDS], Avian ecology and conservation in and Urbanizing World. Kluwer Academic Press, Norwell, MA.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kellert S. R. 1984. Urban American perception of animals and the natural environment. Urban Ecol. 8:209–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luniak, M. 1980. Birds of allotment gardens in Warsaw. Acta Ornithologica 17: 297–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell, M. J., and S. T. A. Pickett. 1990. Ecosystem structure and function along urban-rural gradients: an unexploited opportunity for ecology. Ecology 71:1232–1237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magurran, A. E. 1988. Ecological diversity and its measurement. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marchand, J-P., and P. Riquet. 1996. North Europe, Median Europe. Tome IX, Geographie Universelle. Belin-Reclus, Montpellier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzluff, J. M. 2001. Worldwide increase in urbanization and its effects on birds, p. 19–47. In J. M. Marzluff, R. Bowman, and R. Donnelly [EDS], Avian ecology and conservation in and Urbanizing World. Kluwer Academic Press, Norwell, MA.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Marzluff, J. M., K. J. McGowan, R. Donnelly, and R. L. Knight. 2001. Causes and consequences of expanding American Crow populations, p. 333–365. In J. M. Marzluff, R. Bowman, and R. Donnelly [EDS], Avian ecology and conservation in and Urbanizing World. Kluwer Academic Press, Norwell, MA.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mennechez, G. 1999. Urbanisation et espèces généralistes: Biologie comparée de ľetourneau Sturnus vulgaris lors de la reproduction sur un gradient rural-urbain. Ph.D. Thesis of Univ. Rennesl, Rennes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Middleton, J. 1994. Effects of urbanization on biodiversity in Canada, p. 127–132. In Biodiversity in Canada: a science assessment for Environment Canada, Environment Canada, Ottawa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, D. A., and R. J. Hobbs. 1991. Nature conservation: the role of corridors. Surrey Beatty and sons, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauvage, A. 1992. Les habitants, de nouveaux acteurs sociaux. Editions ľHarmattan, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savard, J.-P. L. 1978. Birds in metropolitan Toronto: distribution, relationships with habitat features, and nesting sites. Ph.D. Thesis of Univ. of Toronto, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sénécal, G. 1996. Champs urbains et développement durable: les approches canadiennes de la ville écologique. Natures, Sciences, Sociétés 4:61–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaar, M. 1979. Attitudes and behaviors of residents in the Québec City region towards urban wildlife. Rep. of Can. Wildl. Serv., Québec.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, S. E. 1974. Interpersonal variation in species map evaluation in bird census work with the mapping method. Acta Ornithol. 14:322–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terrasson, F. 1991. La peur de la Nature. Le Sang de la Terre, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandruff, L. W., D. L. Leedy, and F. W. Stearns. 1995. Urban wildlife and human well-being, p. 203–211. In H. Sukkopp, M. Numata and A. Huber [EDS.], Urban ecology as the basis of urban planning. SPB Academic Publ., The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ville du Havre. 1993. Colonies de Goélands en zones urbaines. Report of scientific and technical workshop, Le Havre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witter, D. J., D. L. Tylka, and J. E. Wermer. 1981. Values of urban wildlife in Missouri. Trans. North Am. Wildl. Nat. Resour. Conf. 46 424–431.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Clergeau, P., Mennechez, G., Sauvage, A., Lemoine, A. (2001). Human perception and appreciation of birds: A motivation for wildlife conservation in urban environments of France. In: Marzluff, J.M., Bowman, R., Donnelly, R. (eds) Avian Ecology and Conservation in an Urbanizing World. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1531-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1531-9_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5600-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-1531-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics