Abstract
Conservation of biodiversity in urban areas needs both scientific justification and public interest. However, data about the public’s perception of urban wildlife is scarce in Western Europe. To identify human perception and appreciation of urban wildlife, we studied avian communities and the public’s perceptions about birds in general, in Rennes, France, at four sectors along a gradient of decreasing urbanization: urban, and adjoining suburban, distant suburban and rural sectors. The diversity and density of birds were analyzed in Rennes during winter and spring (6 censuses). Avian diversity was highest in the distant suburban sector and lowest in urban areas. In the two intermediate sectors (adjoining and distant suburban), diversity was similar and varied little between seasons (Rennes has a relatively temperate climate). The density of birds was highest in urban areas because of the abundance of some species, including Rock Doves (Columba livia) and Swifts (Apus apus) and lowest in the rural sector. Sociological analyses of surveys conducted in Rennes (200 questionnaires) showed that human perception of birds varied with the sector of respondents. Urban dwellers perceived the different bird species (more diversity than density) and appreciated their presence, except for some species, such as Herring Gulls Larus argentatus or European Starlings Sturnus vulgaris. According to our results, efforts to increase or maintain avian biodiversity in cities appears to be justified in terms the perceived benefit to humans, both in terms of the perceived environmental and personal benefits to humans. However, when a species must be managed (e.g. roosting European Starlings), different attitudes by the public in different parts of the city may require different styles of communicating management objectives.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adams, L.W. 1994. Urban wildlife habitats, a landscape perspective. Univ. of Minnesota Press, MN.
Alberti, M., E. Botsford, and A. Cohen. 2001. Quantifying the urban gradient: linking urban planning and ecology. In J. M. Marzluff, R. Bowman, and R. Donnelly [EDS.], Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Kluwer Academic, Norwell, MA.
Allain, R. 1992. La maison et la ville en Bretagne. Ph.D. Thesis of Univ. Rennes2, Rennes, France.
Allain, R., and G. Baudelle. 1991. La structure résidentielle de Rennes. Géographie sociale 11:431–444.
Blair, R. B. 1996. Land use and avian species diversity along an urban gradient. Ecol. Appl. 6: 506–519.
Brown, T., D. Dawson, and R. Miller. 1979. Interests and attitudes of metropolitan New York residents about wildlife. Trans. North Am. Wildl. Nat. Resour. Conf. 44:289–297.
Clergeau, P. 1995. De nouveaux oiseaux dans la ville? Colonisation des zones urbaines par les étourneaux. Report Ministère de l’Environnement/Ministère du Logement, Paris, France.
Clergeau, P. 1996. Urban biodiversity: is there such a thing? Le courrier du CNRS, special issue Cities- Habitat II Istanbul, CNRS ed., Paris.
Clergeau, P. 1997. Oiseaux à risques en ville et en campagne; vers une gestion intégrée des populations. INRA ed., Paris, France.
Clergeau, P., D. Esterlingot, J. Chaperon, and C. Lerat. 1996. Difficultés de cohabitation entre ľhomme et ľanimal: le cas des concentrations ďoiseaux en site urbain. Natures, Sciences, Sociétés 4:102–115.
Clergeau, P., J. P. L. Savard, G. Mennechez, and G. Fallardeau. 1998. Bird abundance and diversity along an urban-rural gradient: a comparative study between two cities on different continents. Condor 100:413–425.
Congress of Leicester. 1995. Recent advances in urban and post-industrial wildlife conservation and habitat creation. Land Contamination and Reclamation 3:59–153.
Congress of Starsbourg. 1994. Vers une gestion raisonnée des espaces verts. Le Centre National de la Fonction Publique ed., Paris.
Conover, M. R. 1997. Wildlife management by metropolitan residents in the United States: practices, perceptions, costs and values. Wildl Soc. Bull. 25:306–311.
Davis, A. M., and T. F. Glick. 1978 Urban ecosystems and island biogeography. Environ. Conserv. 5:299–304.
Dagg, A. I. 1970. Wildlife in an urban area. Nature Can. 97: 201–212.
Erz, W. 1966. Ecological principles in the urbanization of birds. Ostrich Suppl. 6: 357–363.
Fabos, J. G., and J. Ahern. 1996. Greenways, the beginning of an international movement. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
Furness, R. W., and J. J. D. Greenwood. 1993. Birds as monitors of environmental change. Chapman and Hall, London.
Gilbert, O. 1989. The ecology of urban habitats. Chapman and Hall, London.
Guégan-Roué, A. 1994. La dynamique spatiale de ľagglomération rennaise: la télédétection comme outil ďanalyse et de gestion de ľespace. Ph.D. Thesis of Univ. Rennes2, Rennes.
Haag, D. 1993. Street pigeons in Basel. Nature 361:200.
Haskell, D. G., A. M. Knupp, and M. C. Schneider. 2001. Nest predator abundance and urbanization, p. 245–260. In J. M. Marzluff, R. Bowman, and R. Donnelly [EDS], Avian ecology and conservation in and Urbanizing World. Kluwer Academic Press, Norwell, MA.
Hunt, J. 1994. The social construction of precaution, p. 117–125. In O’Riordan, T., and J. Cameron [EDS.], Interpreting the precaution principle. Earthscan, London.
Ilyichev V. D., V. M Konstantinov, and B. M. Zvonov. 1990. The urbanized landscape as an arena for mutual relations between man and birds, p. 122–130. In M. Luniak [ED.], Proceedings of international symposium on urban ecological studies in central and eastern Europe. Pol. Acad. Sci., Warszawa.
Johnston, R. F. 2001. Synanthropic birds of North America, p. 49–67. In J. M. Marzluff, R. Bowman, and R. Donnelly [EDS], Avian ecology and conservation in and Urbanizing World. Kluwer Academic Press, Norwell, MA.
Kellert S. R. 1984. Urban American perception of animals and the natural environment. Urban Ecol. 8:209–228.
Luniak, M. 1980. Birds of allotment gardens in Warsaw. Acta Ornithologica 17: 297–320.
McDonnell, M. J., and S. T. A. Pickett. 1990. Ecosystem structure and function along urban-rural gradients: an unexploited opportunity for ecology. Ecology 71:1232–1237.
Magurran, A. E. 1988. Ecological diversity and its measurement. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
Marchand, J-P., and P. Riquet. 1996. North Europe, Median Europe. Tome IX, Geographie Universelle. Belin-Reclus, Montpellier.
Marzluff, J. M. 2001. Worldwide increase in urbanization and its effects on birds, p. 19–47. In J. M. Marzluff, R. Bowman, and R. Donnelly [EDS], Avian ecology and conservation in and Urbanizing World. Kluwer Academic Press, Norwell, MA.
Marzluff, J. M., K. J. McGowan, R. Donnelly, and R. L. Knight. 2001. Causes and consequences of expanding American Crow populations, p. 333–365. In J. M. Marzluff, R. Bowman, and R. Donnelly [EDS], Avian ecology and conservation in and Urbanizing World. Kluwer Academic Press, Norwell, MA.
Mennechez, G. 1999. Urbanisation et espèces généralistes: Biologie comparée de ľetourneau Sturnus vulgaris lors de la reproduction sur un gradient rural-urbain. Ph.D. Thesis of Univ. Rennesl, Rennes.
Middleton, J. 1994. Effects of urbanization on biodiversity in Canada, p. 127–132. In Biodiversity in Canada: a science assessment for Environment Canada, Environment Canada, Ottawa.
Saunders, D. A., and R. J. Hobbs. 1991. Nature conservation: the role of corridors. Surrey Beatty and sons, Australia.
Sauvage, A. 1992. Les habitants, de nouveaux acteurs sociaux. Editions ľHarmattan, Paris.
Savard, J.-P. L. 1978. Birds in metropolitan Toronto: distribution, relationships with habitat features, and nesting sites. Ph.D. Thesis of Univ. of Toronto, Toronto.
Sénécal, G. 1996. Champs urbains et développement durable: les approches canadiennes de la ville écologique. Natures, Sciences, Sociétés 4:61–74.
Shaar, M. 1979. Attitudes and behaviors of residents in the Québec City region towards urban wildlife. Rep. of Can. Wildl. Serv., Québec.
Svensson, S. E. 1974. Interpersonal variation in species map evaluation in bird census work with the mapping method. Acta Ornithol. 14:322–338.
Terrasson, F. 1991. La peur de la Nature. Le Sang de la Terre, Paris.
Vandruff, L. W., D. L. Leedy, and F. W. Stearns. 1995. Urban wildlife and human well-being, p. 203–211. In H. Sukkopp, M. Numata and A. Huber [EDS.], Urban ecology as the basis of urban planning. SPB Academic Publ., The Hague.
Ville du Havre. 1993. Colonies de Goélands en zones urbaines. Report of scientific and technical workshop, Le Havre.
Witter, D. J., D. L. Tylka, and J. E. Wermer. 1981. Values of urban wildlife in Missouri. Trans. North Am. Wildl. Nat. Resour. Conf. 46 424–431.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Clergeau, P., Mennechez, G., Sauvage, A., Lemoine, A. (2001). Human perception and appreciation of birds: A motivation for wildlife conservation in urban environments of France. In: Marzluff, J.M., Bowman, R., Donnelly, R. (eds) Avian Ecology and Conservation in an Urbanizing World. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1531-9_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1531-9_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5600-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-1531-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive