Skip to main content

Survey techniques and habitat relationships of breeding birds in residential areas of Toronto, Canada

  • Chapter
Avian Ecology and Conservation in an Urbanizing World

Abstract

We measured bird abundance and diversity in seven types of residential areas in Toronto, Canada, during the breeding season. We used transects and a combination of nest searching and spot-mapping. Transects underestimated the size for the breeding population for most species. Relationships between the two methods varied between species and residential areas indicating that for several species relative abundance was not directly proportional to breeding density. Several bird species responded similarly to habitat features. Rock Dove (Columbia livid), European Starling (Sturnus vulgaris) and Chimney Swift (Chaetura pelagica) were positively associated with house density and negatively with lawn area. House Sparrow was somewhat different, possibly because they built nests in conifers whenever cavities were absent thus they may not be so dependent on buildings. Another group, including Mourning Dove (Zenaida macroura), American Robin (Turdus migratorius), Common Grackle (Quiscalus quiscula) and Northern Cardinal (Cardinalis cardinalis), all were positively associated with low foliage and lawn area and negatively associated with house density. Other native species (Blue Jay [Cyanocitta cristata], Chipping Sparrow [Spizella passerina], Song Sparrow [Melospiza melodia] and Brown-headed Cowbird [Molothrus ater] shared the same habitat associations as the latter group to a greater or lesser extent. Conifers and shrubs appear to be the two key components linked to species diversity in temperate cities. Our results highlight the duality of the urban bird community structure: 1) the presence of typical urban birds (House Sparrow [Passer domesticus], European Starling, Rock Dove and Chimney Swift) that respond to architectural features first and to natural features second, and 2) the presence of native birds associated with remnant natural features, especially vegetation structure and volume.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, L. W. 1994. Urban wildlife habitats: a landscape perspective. Univ. Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batten, A. L. 1972. Breeding bird species diversity in relation to increasing urbanization. Bird Study 19:157–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bibby, C. J., N. D. Burgess, and D. A. Hill, 1992. Bird Census Techniques. British Trust for Ornithology and Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bezzel, E. 1985. Birdlife in intensively used rural and urban environments. Ornis Fennica 62:990–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, K. P., D. R. Anderson, and J. L Laake, 1980. Estimation of density from line transect sampling of biological populations. Wildl. Monogr. 72:1–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clergeau, P., J.-P. L. Savard, G. Mennechez, and G. Falardeau. 1998. Bird abundance and diversity along an urban-rural gradient: a comparative study between two cities on different continents. Condor 100:413–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enemar, A. 1959. On the determination of the size and composition of a passerine bird population during the breeding season. Var Fagelvarld, Suppl. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emlen, J. T. 1971. Population densities of birds derived from transect counts. Auk 88:323–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emlen J. T. 1974. An urban bird community in Tucson, AZ: derivation, structure, regulation. Condor 76:184–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erskine, A. J. 1971. Mature poplar forest. American Birds 25:977–978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erskine, A. J. 1974. Small town residential area with wooded vacant lots. American Birds 28:1053–1054.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franzreb, K. E. 1976. Comparison of variable strip transect and spot-map methods for censusing avian populations in a mixed coniferous forest. Condor 78:260–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geis, A. D. 1974. Effect of urbanization and type of urban development on bird populations, p. 97–105. In J. H. Noyes and D.R. Progulski [EDS.], Wildlife in an urbanizing environment. Planning and Resource Development Series No. 28. Noldsworth Natural Resources Center. Cooperative Extension Service, Univ. of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, O. L. 1989. The ecology of urban habitats. Chapman and Hall, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Goetz, E. 1975. Habitat variables and urban songbird population. M.S. Thesis, West Virginia Univ., Morgantown, WV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadidian, J., J. Sauer, C. Swarth, P. Hanly, S. Droege, C. Willilams, J. Huff, and G. Didden. 1997. A citywide breeding bird survey for Washington, D.C. Urban Ecosystems 1:87–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haukiöja, E. 1968. Reliability of the line transect survey method in bird census with reference to reed bunting and sedge warbler. Ornis Fenn. 45:105–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooper, R. G., E. F. Smith, H. S. Crawford, B. S. Mcginnes, and V. J. Walker. 1975. Nesting bird populations in a new town. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 3:111–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jokimaki, J. 1999. Occurrence of breeding bird species in urban parks: effects of park structure and broad-scale variables. Urban Ecosystems 3:21–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jokimaki, J., and E. Huhta. 1996. Effects of landscape matrix and habitat structure on a bird community in northern Finland: A multi-scale approach. Ornis Fennica 73:97–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jokimaki, J., and J. Suhonen. 1993. Effects of urbanization on the breeding bird species richness in Finland: a biogeographical comparison. Ornis Fennica 70:71–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jokimaki, J., and J. Suhonen. 1998. Distribution and habitat selection of wintering birds in urban environments. Landscape and Urban Planning 39:253–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jokimaki, J., J. Suhonen, K. Inski, and S. Jokinen. 1996. Biogeographical comparison of winter bird assemblages in urban environments in Finland. J. Biogeogr. 23:379–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, C. J. 1989. Ecological methodology. Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, R. K., and W. E. Rees. 1979. Bird communities and the structure of urban habitats. Can. J. Zool. 57:2358–2368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucid, V. J. 1974. Bird utilization of habitat in residential areas. Ph.D. Diss., Va. Polytech. Inst, and State Univ., Blacksburg, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luniak, M. 1992. The use of nest-boxes for the management of breeding avifauna in urban parks — studies in Warsaw and Poynan (Poland). Acta Ornithologica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzluff, J. M. 1986. Assumptions and design of regression experiments: The importance of lack-of-fit testing, p165–170. In J. Verner, M. L. Morrison, and C. J. Ralph [EDS.], Modelling habitat relationships of terrestrial vertebrates, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, G. R. II, J. M. Nocilly, and R. I. Shearer. 1976. Observations at a cavity nest of the common grackle and an analysis of grackle nest sites. Wilson Bull. 88:505–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, G. S., B. Dunning Jr., and J. M. Bates 1989. Effects of urbanization on breeding bird community structure in south-western desert habitats. Condor 91:416–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morneau, F., R. Décarie, R. Pelletier, D. Lambert, J.-L. DesGranges, and J.-P. L. Savard. 1999. Changes in breeding bird richness and abundance in Montreal parks over a period of 15 years. Landscape and Urban Planning 44:111–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Natuhara, Y. and C. Imai. 1996. Spatial structure of avifauna along urban-rural gradients. Ecol. Res. 11:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oelke, H. 1967a. Mature pine stands (85–95 years old) of the southern Canadian shield. Audubon Field-Notes 21:617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oelke, H. 1967b. Mature pine stands (100–110 years old) of the southern Canadian shield. Audubon Field-Notes 21:617–618.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, W. R. 1989. Analyzing statistical tests. Evolution 43:223–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savard, J.-P. L., P. Clergeau, and G. Mennechez. 2000. Biodiversity concepts and urban ecosystems. Landscape and Urban Planning. 48:131–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schinner, J. R. 1974. An analysis of the interrelationship of habitat and avifauna in Metropolitan Detroit. Ph.D. Diss., Michigan State Univ., Lansing, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. L. 1956. An evaluation of conifer plantations as wildlife habitat. Ph.D. Diss., Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suthers, R. A. 1960. Measurement of some lake-shore territories of the song sparrow. Wilson Bull. 72:232–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tate, D. 1973. Habitat usage by the chipping sparrow (Spizella passerina) in Northern lower Michigan. Ph.D. Diss., University of Nebraska-Lincoln, NE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P. 1983. Mature maple-hemlock forest. American Birds 37:70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. 1973. The determination of habitat requirements for birds in suburban areas. A pilot study. Ph.D. Diss., University of Massachusetts., Amherst, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verheyen, R. F. 1969. Le choix du nichoir chez ľétourneau (Sturnus v. vulgaris). Le Gerfaut 59:239–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, W. C. 1972. Birds in cities: a study of populations, foraging ecology, and nest-sites of urban birds. Can. Field Nat. 89:457–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, R. D. 1974. Birds in Washington, D.C., p. 131–135. In J. H. Noyes and D. R. Progulske [EDS.], Wildlife in an urbanizing environment. Planning and Resource Development Series No. 28. Noldsworth Natural Resources Center. Cooperative Extension Service, Univ. of Massachussetts, Amherst, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, R. D and R. M. DeGraaf. 1980. Habitat associations of 10 bird species in Washington, DC. Urban Ecology 5:125–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolfenden, G. E. and S. A. Rohwer. 1969. Breeding birds in a Florida suburb. Bull. Florida State Museum 13:1–83.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Savard, JP.L., Falls, J.B. (2001). Survey techniques and habitat relationships of breeding birds in residential areas of Toronto, Canada. In: Marzluff, J.M., Bowman, R., Donnelly, R. (eds) Avian Ecology and Conservation in an Urbanizing World. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1531-9_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1531-9_26

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5600-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-1531-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics