Skip to main content

Avian community characteristics of urban greenspaces in St. Louis, Missouri

  • Chapter
Avian Ecology and Conservation in an Urbanizing World

Abstract

We studied bird communities among six vegetation classes in St. Louis to determine how a range of greenspace types function as avian habitat. During 1997 and 1998, 67 bird species were recorded along strip transects among the six habitats sampled. The open woodland habitat supported a unique community, and provided habitat for cavity and middle/upper canopy nesting species. The important species that specialized in woodlands were the Redheaded Woodpecker (Melanerpes erythrocephalus) and House Wren (Troglodytes aedon). All other habitats separated out based on the interpretation of species data in an ordination analysis. We measured 13 habitat variables, and of these, canopy closure, shrub density, forb cover, and canopy height best explained bird species variation, suggesting these features are important for managing bird habitat in St. Louis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Antikainen, E. 1992. The vertical use of a city park by urban birds in Poland. Ornis. Fennica 69:92–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, G. M. A., and A. Graf. 1989. Principles for nature conservation in towns and cities. Urban Wildlife Now, No. 3, Nature Conservancy Council, Peterborough, United Kingdom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, R. B. 1996. Land-use and avian species diversity along an urban gradient. Ecol. Appl. 6:506–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, J., C. M. Harrison, and M. Limb. 1988. People, parks, and urban green: A study of popular meanings and values for open spaces in the city. Urban Studies 25:455–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christman, S. P. 1984. Plot mapping: estimating densities of breeding bird territories by combining spot mapping and transect techniques. Condor 86:237–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cicero, C. 1989. Avian community structure in a large urban park: controls of local richness and diversity. Landscape Urban Plann. 17:221–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeGraaf R. M.., A. D. Geis, and P. A. Healy. 1991. Bird population and habitat surveys in urban areas. Landscape Urban Plann. 21:181–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeGraaf, R. M., and J. M. Wentworth. 1986. Avian guild structure and habitat associations in suburban bird communities. Urban Ecology 9:399–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flores, A., S. T. A. Pickett, W. C. Zipperer, R. V. Pouyat, and R. Pirani. 1998. Adopting a modern ecological view of the metropolitan landscape: the case study of a greenspace system for the New York City region. Landscape Urban Plann. 39:295–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gavareski, C. A. 1976. Relation of park size and vegetation to urban bird populations in Seattle, Washington. Condor 78:375–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geis, A. D. 1974. Effects of urbanization and type of urban development on bird populations, p.97–105. In J. H. Noyes and D. R. Progulske [EDS.], Wildlife in an urbanizing environment. Cooperative Extension Service University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Germaine, S. S., S. S. Rosenstock, R. E. Schweinsburg, and W. S. Richardson. 1998. Relationships among breeding birds, habitat, and residential development in greater Tucson, Arizona. Ecol. Appl. 8:680–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, C, M. Limb, and J. Burgess. 1987. Nature in the city — popular values for a living world. J. of Environ. Manag. 25:347–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, M. 1986. Manual of plant formation entitation. New York City Department of Parks and Recreation Natural Resource Group, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurley, A. 1997. Floods, rats, and toxic waste, p.242–261. In A. Hurley [ED.], Common fields: an environmental history of St. Louis. Missouri Historical Society Press. St. Louis, MO.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, F. C., and H. H. Shugart. 1970. A quantitative method of habitat description. Audubon Field Notes 24:727–736.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lussenhop, J. 1977. Urban cemeteries as bird refuges. Condor 79:456–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, M. J., S. O’Connor, and R. S. Cole. 1988. Database for the New York State urban wildlife habitat inventory. Landscape Urban Plann. 15:23–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCune, B. and M. J. Mefford. 1997. Multivariate analysis of ecological data version 3.0. MJM Software, Glenden Beach, OR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller-Dombois, D., and H. Ellenberg. 1974. Aims and methods of vegetation ecology. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Natuhara, Y. and C. Imai. 1996. Spatial structure of avifauna along urban-rural gradients. Ecol. Res. 11:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilon, C. H. and G. S. Huckstep. 1998. Analysis of Chicago River recreation habitats, p. 161–172. In P. H. Gobster and L. M. Westphal [EDS.], People and the river: perception and use of Chicago waterways for recreation. USDI National Park Service, River, Trails and Conservation Assistance Program. Milwaukee, WI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilon, C. H., C. N. Long, and W. C. Zipperer. 1995. Effects of wildland development on forest bird communities. Landscape Urban Plann. 32:81–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peladeau, N. 1996. SIMSTAT for Windows user’s guide. Provalis Research, Montreal, QC, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiley, J. O., and S. E. Page. 1995. Survey mapping and evaluation of green space in the federal territory of Kuala Lampur, Malaysia, p. 173–184. In H. Sukopp, M. Numata, and A. Huber [EDS.], Urban ecology as the basis of urban planning. SPB Academic Publishers, The Hague, Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, D. C. 1994 The design of an urban open-space network for the city of Durban (South Africa). Environmental Conserv. 21:11–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers G. F., and R. A. Rowntree, 1988. Intensive surveys of structure and change in urban natural areas. Landscape Urban Plann. 15:59–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauer, J. R., J. E. Hines, G. Gough, I. Thomas, and B. G. Peterjohn. 1997. The North American Breeding Bird Survey Results and Analysis. Version 96.4. Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, W. 1997. Environmental setting of the St. Louis region, p. 13–37. In A. Hurley [ED.], Common fields: an environmental history of St. Louis. Missouri Historical Society Press. St. Louis, MO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suhonen, J., and J. Jokimaki. 1988. A biogeographical comparison of the breeding bird species assemblages in twenty Finish urban parks. Ornis Fennica 65:76–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sukopp H., and S. Weiler. 1988. Biotope mapping and mature conservation strategies in urban areas of West Germany. Landscape Urban Plann. 15:39–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ter Braak, J. F., 1986. Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 67:1167–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. W., and R. A. Dixon. 1974. Cemetery ecology, p. 107–110. In J. H. Noyes, and D. R. Progulski [EDS.], A symposium of wildlife in an urbanizing environment. University of Massachusetts Cooperative Extension Service, Amherst, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorn, R. H., and J. H. Wilson. 1980. The natural divisions of Missouri. Transactions of the Missouri Academy of Science 14:9–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilghman, N. G. 1987. Characteristics of urban woodlands affecting breeding bird diversity and abundance. Landscape Urban Plann. 14:481–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wayman, N. L. 1979. History of St. Louis neighborhoods. St. Louis Community Development Agency, St. Louis, MO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zipperer, W. C., S. M. Sisinni, and R. V. Pouyat. 1997. Urban tree cover: an ecological perspective. Urban Ecosystems 1:229–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Azerrad, J.M., Nilon, C.H. (2001). Avian community characteristics of urban greenspaces in St. Louis, Missouri. In: Marzluff, J.M., Bowman, R., Donnelly, R. (eds) Avian Ecology and Conservation in an Urbanizing World. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1531-9_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1531-9_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5600-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-1531-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics