Skip to main content

Abstract

I compared birds on urban gradients in two ecoregions of the United States by censusing summer resident bird populations at six sites in central California’s coastal chaparral and southwest Ohio’s eastern broadleaf forest. These sites represented comparable gradients of urban land-use which ranged from relatively undisturbed to highly developed and included biological preserves, recreational areas, golf courses, residential neighborhoods, office parks (or apartment complexes), and business districts. Species richness and Shannon diversity peaked at moderately disturbed sites and were significantly correlated between comparable land-use types in the two ecoregions. Bird abundance and biomass peaked at moderately disturbed sites as well but were not significantly correlated between ecoregions. The pre-development bird species (assumed to be those found at the most undisturbed sites) dropped out gradually as the sites became more urban and the number of remaining species was significantly correlated between ecoregions with only three (CA) and one (OH) species remaining in the most urban sites. Taxonomically, the bird communities at the least urbanized sites (the preserves and recreational areas) were very different with an average Jaccard’s index of species similarity of 0.065 while the most disturbed sites (the business district, apartment complexes/office park, residential areas and golf courses) had an average similarity of 0.185. The species assemblages along the gradient shifted gradually, demonstrating local extinction of and local invasion by different species as the sites become more urban.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alberti, M., E. Botsford, and A. Cohen. 2001. Quantifying the urban gradient: linking urban planning and ecology, p. 89–115. In J. M. Marzluff, R. Bowman, and R. Donnelly [EDS.], Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Kluwer Academic, Norwell, MA.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Atmar, W. and B. D. Patterson. 1993. The measure of order and disorder in the distribution of species in fragmented habitat. Oecologia 96:373–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, R. G., P. E. Avers, T. King, W. H. McNab, eds. 1994. Ecoregions and subregions of the United States (map). Washington, DC; U.S. Geological Survey. Scale 1:7,500,000; colored. Accompanied by a supplementary table of map unit descriptions compiled and edited by McNab, W. H., and R. G. Bailey, Prepared for the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beissinger, S. R. and D. R. Osborne. 1982. Effects of urbanization on avian community organization. Condor 84:75–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair, R. B. 1994. Birds, butterflies, and conservation on an urban gradient in central California. Ph.D. dissertation. Stanford University, Stanford, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, R. B. 1996. Land-use and avian species diversity along an urban gradient. Ecol. Appl.. 6:506–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair, R. B. 1999. Birds and butterflies: surrogate taxa for assessing biodiversity? Ecol. Appl.. 9:164–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolger, D. 2001. Urban birds: population, community, and landscape approaches, p. 155–177. In J. M. Marzluff, R. Bowman, and R. Donnelly [EDS.], Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Kluwer Academic, Norwell, MA.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bolger, D. T., A. C. Alberts, and M. E. Soulé. 1991. Occurrence patterns of bird species in habitat fragments: sampling, extinction, and nested species subsets. Am. Nat. 137:155–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Case, T. J. 1996. Global patterns in the establishment and distribution of exotic birds. Biol. Conserv. 78:69–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clay, G. 1994. Real places: an unconventional guide to America’s generic landscape. The University of Chicago Press, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clergeau, P., J. L. Savard, G. Mennechez, and G. Falardeau. 1998. Bird abundance and diversity along an urban-rural gradient: A comparative study between two cities on different continents. Condor 100:413–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W. S. 1926. Vegetational development upon alluvial fans in the vicinity of Palo Alto, California. Ecology 7:1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, G. S., J. B. Dunning Jr., and J. M. Bates. 1993. CRC handbook of avian body masses. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, P. R., D. S. Dobkin, and D. Wheye. 1988. The Birder’s Handbook. Simon and Schuster, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, K. L. and W. S. Smithson. 1999. Urbanization and naturalized exotic bird species: a close fit. Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world symposium, Annual meeting of the Cooper Ornithological Society, Portland, OR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gering, J. C. and R. B. Blair. 1999. Predation on artificial bird nests along an urban gradient: predatory risk or relaxation in urban environments? Ecography. 22:532–541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Germaine S. S., S. S. Rosenstock, R. E. Schweinsburg, and W. S. Richardson. 1998. Relationships among breeding birds, habitat, and residential development in Greater Tucson, Arizona. Ecol. Appl. 8:680–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, R. J. and H. A. Mooney. 1998. Broadening the extinction debate: Population deletions and additions in California and western Australia. Conserv. Biol. 12: 271–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hostetler, M. 2001. The importance of multi-scale analyses in avian habitat selection studies in urban environments, p. 139–154. In J. M. Marzluff, R. Bowman, and R. Donnelly [EDS.], Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Kluwer Academic, Norwell, MA.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jongman, R. H. G., C. J. F. Ter Braak, and O. F. R. Van Tongeren. 1995. Data analysis in community and landscape ecology. Cambridge Univ. Press, United Kingdom.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Karr, J. R. and E. W. Chu. 1998. Restoring life in running: Using multimetric indexes effectively. Island Press, Covelo, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodge, D. M. 1993. Biological invasions: Lessons for ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 8:133–137.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lodge, D. M., R. A. Stein. K. M. Brown, A. P. Covich, C. Brönmark, J. E. Garvey and S. P. Losiewski. 1998. Predicting impact of freshwater exotic species on biodiversity: Challenges in spatial scaling. Aust. J. Ecol. 23:53–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, J. L. 1982. Introduced birds of the world. Universe Books, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magurran, A. E. 1988. Ecological diversity and its measurement. Princeton Univ. Press, NJ.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marzluff, J. M. 2001. Worldwide increase in urbanization and its effects on birds, p. 19–47. In J. M. Marzluff, R. Bowman, and R. Donnelly [EDS.], Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Kluwer Academic, Norwell, MA.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McKinney, M. L. 1998. On predicting biotic homogenization: species-area patterns in marine biota. Global Ecol. Biogeo. Letters 7:297–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J., J. Fraterrigo, J. Wiens, and T. Hobbs. 2001. Urbanization, avian communities, and landscape ecology, p. 117–137. In J. M. Marzluff, R. Bowman, and R. Donnelly [EDS.], Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Kluwer Academic, Norwell, MA.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, G. S., J. B. Dunning Jr., and J. M. Bates. 1989. Effects of urbanization on breeding bird community structure in southwestern desert habitats. Condor 91:416–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray, M. A., and J. L. Vankat. 1982. A vegetation map of Hueston Woods State Park and Nature Preserve, p.22–29. In G. E. Willeke [ED.], Hueston Woods State Park and Nature Preserve: Proceedings of symposium, Miami University, Oxford, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichard, S., L. Chalker-Scott, and S. Buchanan. 2001. Interactions among non-native plants and birds. In J. M. Marzluff, R. Bowman, and R. Donnelly [EDS.], Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world, p. 179–223. Kluwer Academic, Norwell, MA.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, R. T., J. M. Scott, and R. A. Nussbaum. 1980. A variable circular-plot method for estimating bird numbers. Condor 82:309–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, C. E. and W. Weaver. 1949. The mathematical theory of communication. Univ. of Illinois Press, Urbana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sierra Club. 1998. The dark side of the american dream: the costs and consequences of suburban sprawl. (Online). http://www.sierraclub.org/sprawl/report98/

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenberg, K. 1988. Urban macrostructure and wildlife distributions: regional planning implications. Ph.D. dissertation. Univ. of Arizona, Tucson.

    Google Scholar 

  • SYSTAT 1992. SYSTAT: Statistics, Version 5.2. SYSTAT Inc., Evanston, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Bael, S. and S. Pruett-Jones. Exponential population growth on Monk Parakeets in the United States. Wilson Bull. 108:584–588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Home, B. 1983. Density as a misleading indicator of habitat quality. J. Wildl. Manage. 47:893–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vermeij, G. J. 1991. When biotas meet: Understanding biotic interchange. Science 253:1099–1104.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vickery, P. D. and M. L. Hunter, J. V. Wells. 1992. Is density an indicator of breeding success? Auk 109:706–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek, P. M., C. M. D’Antonio, L. L. Loope, and R. Westbrooks. 1996. Biological invasions as global change. Amer. Scientist 84:468–478

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetmore, A. 1964. Song and garden birds of North America. National Geographic Society, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, C. A. 1924. The Starling family at home and abroad. Condor. 26:123–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuboy, J. R. 1981. A new tool for fisheries managers: the Delphi Technique. N. Amer. J. Fish. Manage. 1:55–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Blair, R.B. (2001). Creating a homogeneous avifauna. In: Marzluff, J.M., Bowman, R., Donnelly, R. (eds) Avian Ecology and Conservation in an Urbanizing World. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1531-9_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1531-9_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5600-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-1531-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics