Abstract
I compared birds on urban gradients in two ecoregions of the United States by censusing summer resident bird populations at six sites in central California’s coastal chaparral and southwest Ohio’s eastern broadleaf forest. These sites represented comparable gradients of urban land-use which ranged from relatively undisturbed to highly developed and included biological preserves, recreational areas, golf courses, residential neighborhoods, office parks (or apartment complexes), and business districts. Species richness and Shannon diversity peaked at moderately disturbed sites and were significantly correlated between comparable land-use types in the two ecoregions. Bird abundance and biomass peaked at moderately disturbed sites as well but were not significantly correlated between ecoregions. The pre-development bird species (assumed to be those found at the most undisturbed sites) dropped out gradually as the sites became more urban and the number of remaining species was significantly correlated between ecoregions with only three (CA) and one (OH) species remaining in the most urban sites. Taxonomically, the bird communities at the least urbanized sites (the preserves and recreational areas) were very different with an average Jaccard’s index of species similarity of 0.065 while the most disturbed sites (the business district, apartment complexes/office park, residential areas and golf courses) had an average similarity of 0.185. The species assemblages along the gradient shifted gradually, demonstrating local extinction of and local invasion by different species as the sites become more urban.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alberti, M., E. Botsford, and A. Cohen. 2001. Quantifying the urban gradient: linking urban planning and ecology, p. 89–115. In J. M. Marzluff, R. Bowman, and R. Donnelly [EDS.], Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Kluwer Academic, Norwell, MA.
Atmar, W. and B. D. Patterson. 1993. The measure of order and disorder in the distribution of species in fragmented habitat. Oecologia 96:373–382.
Bailey, R. G., P. E. Avers, T. King, W. H. McNab, eds. 1994. Ecoregions and subregions of the United States (map). Washington, DC; U.S. Geological Survey. Scale 1:7,500,000; colored. Accompanied by a supplementary table of map unit descriptions compiled and edited by McNab, W. H., and R. G. Bailey, Prepared for the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.
Beissinger, S. R. and D. R. Osborne. 1982. Effects of urbanization on avian community organization. Condor 84:75–83.
Blair, R. B. 1994. Birds, butterflies, and conservation on an urban gradient in central California. Ph.D. dissertation. Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Blair, R. B. 1996. Land-use and avian species diversity along an urban gradient. Ecol. Appl.. 6:506–519.
Blair, R. B. 1999. Birds and butterflies: surrogate taxa for assessing biodiversity? Ecol. Appl.. 9:164–170.
Bolger, D. 2001. Urban birds: population, community, and landscape approaches, p. 155–177. In J. M. Marzluff, R. Bowman, and R. Donnelly [EDS.], Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Kluwer Academic, Norwell, MA.
Bolger, D. T., A. C. Alberts, and M. E. Soulé. 1991. Occurrence patterns of bird species in habitat fragments: sampling, extinction, and nested species subsets. Am. Nat. 137:155–166.
Case, T. J. 1996. Global patterns in the establishment and distribution of exotic birds. Biol. Conserv. 78:69–96.
Clay, G. 1994. Real places: an unconventional guide to America’s generic landscape. The University of Chicago Press, IL.
Clergeau, P., J. L. Savard, G. Mennechez, and G. Falardeau. 1998. Bird abundance and diversity along an urban-rural gradient: A comparative study between two cities on different continents. Condor 100:413–425.
Cooper, W. S. 1926. Vegetational development upon alluvial fans in the vicinity of Palo Alto, California. Ecology 7:1–30.
Mills, G. S., J. B. Dunning Jr., and J. M. Bates. 1993. CRC handbook of avian body masses. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Ehrlich, P. R., D. S. Dobkin, and D. Wheye. 1988. The Birder’s Handbook. Simon and Schuster, New York, NY.
Garrett, K. L. and W. S. Smithson. 1999. Urbanization and naturalized exotic bird species: a close fit. Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world symposium, Annual meeting of the Cooper Ornithological Society, Portland, OR.
Gering, J. C. and R. B. Blair. 1999. Predation on artificial bird nests along an urban gradient: predatory risk or relaxation in urban environments? Ecography. 22:532–541.
Germaine S. S., S. S. Rosenstock, R. E. Schweinsburg, and W. S. Richardson. 1998. Relationships among breeding birds, habitat, and residential development in Greater Tucson, Arizona. Ecol. Appl. 8:680–691.
Hobbs, R. J. and H. A. Mooney. 1998. Broadening the extinction debate: Population deletions and additions in California and western Australia. Conserv. Biol. 12: 271–283.
Hostetler, M. 2001. The importance of multi-scale analyses in avian habitat selection studies in urban environments, p. 139–154. In J. M. Marzluff, R. Bowman, and R. Donnelly [EDS.], Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Kluwer Academic, Norwell, MA.
Jongman, R. H. G., C. J. F. Ter Braak, and O. F. R. Van Tongeren. 1995. Data analysis in community and landscape ecology. Cambridge Univ. Press, United Kingdom.
Karr, J. R. and E. W. Chu. 1998. Restoring life in running: Using multimetric indexes effectively. Island Press, Covelo, CA.
Lodge, D. M. 1993. Biological invasions: Lessons for ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 8:133–137.
Lodge, D. M., R. A. Stein. K. M. Brown, A. P. Covich, C. Brönmark, J. E. Garvey and S. P. Losiewski. 1998. Predicting impact of freshwater exotic species on biodiversity: Challenges in spatial scaling. Aust. J. Ecol. 23:53–67.
Long, J. L. 1982. Introduced birds of the world. Universe Books, New York, NY.
Magurran, A. E. 1988. Ecological diversity and its measurement. Princeton Univ. Press, NJ.
Marzluff, J. M. 2001. Worldwide increase in urbanization and its effects on birds, p. 19–47. In J. M. Marzluff, R. Bowman, and R. Donnelly [EDS.], Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Kluwer Academic, Norwell, MA.
McKinney, M. L. 1998. On predicting biotic homogenization: species-area patterns in marine biota. Global Ecol. Biogeo. Letters 7:297–301.
Miller, J., J. Fraterrigo, J. Wiens, and T. Hobbs. 2001. Urbanization, avian communities, and landscape ecology, p. 117–137. In J. M. Marzluff, R. Bowman, and R. Donnelly [EDS.], Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Kluwer Academic, Norwell, MA.
Mills, G. S., J. B. Dunning Jr., and J. M. Bates. 1989. Effects of urbanization on breeding bird community structure in southwestern desert habitats. Condor 91:416–428.
Ray, M. A., and J. L. Vankat. 1982. A vegetation map of Hueston Woods State Park and Nature Preserve, p.22–29. In G. E. Willeke [ED.], Hueston Woods State Park and Nature Preserve: Proceedings of symposium, Miami University, Oxford, OH.
Reichard, S., L. Chalker-Scott, and S. Buchanan. 2001. Interactions among non-native plants and birds. In J. M. Marzluff, R. Bowman, and R. Donnelly [EDS.], Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world, p. 179–223. Kluwer Academic, Norwell, MA.
Reynolds, R. T., J. M. Scott, and R. A. Nussbaum. 1980. A variable circular-plot method for estimating bird numbers. Condor 82:309–313.
Shannon, C. E. and W. Weaver. 1949. The mathematical theory of communication. Univ. of Illinois Press, Urbana.
Sierra Club. 1998. The dark side of the american dream: the costs and consequences of suburban sprawl. (Online). http://www.sierraclub.org/sprawl/report98/
Stenberg, K. 1988. Urban macrostructure and wildlife distributions: regional planning implications. Ph.D. dissertation. Univ. of Arizona, Tucson.
SYSTAT 1992. SYSTAT: Statistics, Version 5.2. SYSTAT Inc., Evanston, IL.
Van Bael, S. and S. Pruett-Jones. Exponential population growth on Monk Parakeets in the United States. Wilson Bull. 108:584–588.
Van Home, B. 1983. Density as a misleading indicator of habitat quality. J. Wildl. Manage. 47:893–901.
Vermeij, G. J. 1991. When biotas meet: Understanding biotic interchange. Science 253:1099–1104.
Vickery, P. D. and M. L. Hunter, J. V. Wells. 1992. Is density an indicator of breeding success? Auk 109:706–710.
Vitousek, P. M., C. M. D’Antonio, L. L. Loope, and R. Westbrooks. 1996. Biological invasions as global change. Amer. Scientist 84:468–478
Wetmore, A. 1964. Song and garden birds of North America. National Geographic Society, Washington, DC.
Wood, C. A. 1924. The Starling family at home and abroad. Condor. 26:123–136.
Zuboy, J. R. 1981. A new tool for fisheries managers: the Delphi Technique. N. Amer. J. Fish. Manage. 1:55–59.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Blair, R.B. (2001). Creating a homogeneous avifauna. In: Marzluff, J.M., Bowman, R., Donnelly, R. (eds) Avian Ecology and Conservation in an Urbanizing World. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1531-9_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1531-9_22
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5600-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-1531-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive