Skip to main content

Causes and consequences of expanding American Crow populations

  • Chapter
Avian Ecology and Conservation in an Urbanizing World

Abstract

Corvid populations are increasing worldwide in response to urbanization. We investigated the response of American Crows (Corvus brachyrhynchos) to urbanization by (1) comparing rates of winter population change between urban and nonurban locations (using standard Christmas Bird Counts); (2) quantifying population size along a gradient of urbanization in western Washington; and (3) pooling studies from eastern (New York), midwestern (Wisconsin), and western North America (Washington and California) relating survivorship, reproduction, and space use to urbanization. American Crow populations tend to be densest and increasing most rapidly in urban areas of North America. This appears to be facilitated by small space neEDS of crows in urban relative to suburban, rural, and exurban areas. Crow survivorship is high across the urban gradient, but reproduction and hence population growth, peaks in suburban and rural settings. Local demographic considerations appear unable to account for changing winter crow populations. Rather, we hypothesize that urban crow populations may be increasing primarily as surplus crows from suburban and rural areas disperse into the city where anthropogenic food sources are easily located, rich, and concentrated. This hypothesis likely is affected by local crow sociality. In the western United States, where pre-breeders often form flocks able to exploit urban riches, our dispersal hypothesis may be accurate. But, in midwestern and eastern areas, where crows migrate south for winter or remain on territories to help rather than float as pre-breeders, dispersal may not be adequate to fuel urban population growth. Refuse, invertebrates, and small vertebrates appeared to be more common food items than the nest contents of other birds. This, and the typically diverse suite of nest predators in any area, may explain why the rate of predation on artificial nests we placed throughout the urban gradient was not highly correlated with the abundance of crows. We encourage researchers to study how urbanization affects important mechanisms (like nest predators and predation) so environmental policy will benefit from a detailed, scientific understanding of how avian communities are structured.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Akcakaya, H. R. 1999. RAMAS GIS. Linking landscape data with population viability analysis. Applied Biomathematics. Setauket, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audubon Society. 2000. Audubon Christmas Bird Counts, http://www.mpl-pwrc.usgs.gov/birds/cbc.html./birds/cbc.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, A. 1925. Anent the crow. Condor 27: 83–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. H., and A. Kodric-Brown. 1977. Turnover rates in insular biogeography: Effect of immigration on extinction. Ecology 58:445–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. L. 1969. Territorial behavior and population regulation in birds. Wilson Bull. 81:293–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broyer, J., Fournier, J. Y., and P. Varagnat. 1995. Effect of carrion crow (Corvus corone) reduction on predation on artificial anatid (Anatidae) nests. Gibier Faune Sauvage 12:95–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buehler, D., J. D. Fraser, M. R. Fuller, L. S. McAllister, and J. K. D. Seegar. 1995. Captive and field-tested radio transmitter attachments for bald eagles. J. Field Ornith. 66:173–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butcher, G. S. 1990. Audubon Christmas bird counts. USDI FWS Biological Report 90:5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caccamise, D. F., L. M. Reed, J. Romanowski, and P. C. Stouffer. 1997. Roosting behavior and group territoriality in American crows. Auk 114:628–637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caffrey, C. 1992. Female-biased delayed dispersal and helping in American Crows. Auk 109:609–619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caffrey, C. 1999. Feeding rates and individual contributions to feeding at nests of cooperatively breeding western American crows. Auk 116:836–841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caffrey. C. 2000. Correlates of reproductive success in cooperatively breeding western American crows: If helpers help, it’s not by much. Condor 102:333–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesness, R. A., Nelson, M. M., and W. H. Longley. 1968. The effect of predator removal on pheasant reproductive success. J. Wildl. Manage. 32:683–697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. G.. Meger, D. E., and J. B. Ignatiuk. 1995. Removing American Crows and duck nesting success. Can. J. Zool. 73:518–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly, R. E., and J. M. Marzluff. In press. Designing research to advance the management of birds in urbanizing areas. InW. Shaw and L. Harris [EDS.], Proceedings of the 4thInternational Urban Wildlife Conservation Symposium. Arizona State University, Tempe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Droege, S. 1990. The North American breeding bird survey, p 1–4. InJ. R. Sauer and S. Droege [EDS.], Survey designs and statistical methods for the estimation of avian population trends. U.S. Dept. Inter., Washington, DC.Eden, S. F. 1985. The comparative breeding biology of magpies Pica pica in an urban and a rural habitat. J. Zool., Lond. (A) 205:325–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emlen, J. T., Jr. 1940. The midwinter distribution of the crow in California. Condor 42:287–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraissinet, M. 1989. Espansione della taccola, Corvus monedula, nei capoluoghi italiani. Riv. Ital. Orn. 59: 33–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haskell, D., A. M. Knupp, and M. C. Schneider. 2001. Nest predator abundance and urbanization, p. 245–260. InJ. M. Marzluff, R. Bowman, and R. Donnelly [EDS.], Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Kluwer Academic, Norwell, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogrefe, T. C, and R. H. Yahner. 1998. Depredation of artificial ground nests in a suburban versus a rural landscape. J. Penn. Acad, of Science 72:3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ignatiuk, J. B. and R. G. Clark. 1991. Breeding biology of American crows in Saskatchewan parkland habitat. Canadian J. Zool. 69:168–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jerzak, L. 2001. Synurbanization of the Magpie in the Palearctic, p. 405–427. InJ. M. Marzluff, R. Bowman, and R. Donnelly [EDS.], Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Kluwer Academic, Norwell, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R. F. 2001. The synanthropic birds of North America, p. 49–67. InJ. M. Marzluff, R. Bowman, and R. Donnelly [EDS.], Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Kluwer Academic, Norwell, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenward, R. E. 1987. Wildlife radio tagging. Academic Press, Sand Diego, CA. 222p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenward, R. E. and K. H. Hodder. 1995. Ranges V: software for analysing animal location data. Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Wareham, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konstantinov 1996. Antropogenic transformations of bird communities in the forest zone of the Russian Plain. Acta Ornithologica 31: 53–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konstantinov, V. M., and V. G. Babenko. 1982. Spivn Numbers and some ecological features of synanthropic populations of the corvidae under the conditions of intensive urbanization. 12:1837–1845.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luginbuhl, J. M., J. M. Marzluff, J. E. Bradley, M. G. Raphael, and D. E. Varland. In press. Corvid survey techniques and the relationship between corvid relative abundance and nest predation. J. Field Ornithol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzluff, J. M. 2001. Worldwide increase in urbanization and its effects on birds, p. 19–47. InJ. M. Marzluff, R. Bowman, and R. Donnelly [EDS.], Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Kluwer Academic, Norwell, MA.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Marzluff, J. M., and R. P. Balda. 1992. The Pinyon Jay. T & A D Poyser, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzluff, J. M., R. B. Boone, and G. W. Cox. 1994. Native pest bird species in the West: why have they succeeded where so many have failed? Studies Avian Biol. 15:202–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzluff, J. M., R. Bowman, and R. Donnelly. 2001. A historical perspective on urban bird research: trends, terms and approaches, p. 1–17. InJ. M. Marzluff, R. Bowman, and R. Donnelly [EDS.], Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Kluwer Academic, Norwell, MA.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Marzluff, J. M., Raphael, M. G., and R. Sallabanks. 2000. Understanding why forest management may affect avian species: mechanisms, experimental approaches, prioritization, and funding strategies. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 28:1132–1143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzluff, J. M., and M. Restani. 1999. The effects of forest fragmentation on avian nest predation. Pp: 155–169. In: Forest Fragmentation: Wildlife and Management Implications (J. A. Rochelle, L. A. Lehmann, and J. Wisniewski eds.). Brill Academic Publishing, Leiden, The Neatherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGowan, K. 2001. Demographic and behavioral comparisons of suburban and rural American Crows, p. 367–383. InJ. M. Marzluff, R. Bowman, and R. Donnelly [EDS.], Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Kluwer Academic, Norwell, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monson, G. 1946. Notes on the avifauna of the Rio Grande Valley, New Mexico. Condor 48:238–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, H. 1984. Effect of corvid removal on reproduction of willow ptarmigan and black grouse. J. Wildl. Manage. 48:1197–1205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parr, R. 1993. Nest predation and numbers of Golden Plovers Pluvialis apricariaand other moorland waders. Bird Study 40: 223–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierotti, R., and C. Annett. 2001. The ecology of Western Gulls in habitats varying in degree of urban influence, p. 309–331. InJ. M. Marzluff, R. Bowman, and R. Donnelly [EDS.], Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Kluwer Academic, Norwell, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitelka, F. A. 1942. High population of breeding birds within an artificial habitat. Condor 44: 172–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pulliam, H. R. 1988. Sources, sinks, and population regulation. Am. Nat. 132: 652–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, G. L. (1971). The Common Crow, Corvus brachyrhynchos, in the Great Basin. Condor 73:116–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rickard, W. H. 1959. Changes in winter bird species of two habitats in San Miguel County, New Mexico, after three-fourths of a century. Condor 61:438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, J. M. 1931. Some changes in the bird life of western Orange County, California. Condor 33:204–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S. K., Thompson, F. R. Ill, Donovan, T. M., Whitehead, D. R., and J. Faaborg. 1995. Regional forest fragmentation and the nesting success of migratory birds. Science 267:1987–1990.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, P. B. and M. Taper. 1992. Environmental variation and the persistence of small populations. Ecol. App. 2:18–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tewksbury, J. J., S. J. Hejl, and T. E. Martin. 1998. Breeding productivity does not decline with increasing fragmentation in a western landscape. Ecology 79:2890–2903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verbeek, N. A. M., and R. W. Butler. 1981. Cooperatively breeding of the Northwestern Crow Corvus caurinusin British Columbia. Ibis 123:183–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vekasy, M. S., J. M. Marzluff, M. N. Kochert, R. N. Lehman, and K. Steenhof. 1996. Influence of radio transmitters on Prairie Falcons. J. Field. Ornithol. 67:680–690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel, M., and W. E. Rees. 1996. Our ecological footprint: reducing human impact on the earth.: New Society Publishers, Philadelphia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Withey, J. C., Bloxton, T. D., and J. M. Marzluff. In press. Effects of tagging animals and estimating locations on inferences derived from wildlife radiotelemetry studies, p. 43–75. InJ. J. Millspaugh and J. M. Marzluff [EDS.], Radiotelemetry and animal populations. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Marzluff, J.M., McGowan, K.J., Donnelly, R., Knight, R.L. (2001). Causes and consequences of expanding American Crow populations. In: Marzluff, J.M., Bowman, R., Donnelly, R. (eds) Avian Ecology and Conservation in an Urbanizing World. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1531-9_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1531-9_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5600-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-1531-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics