Ecological Implications of the Shellfishery; A Case Study on the West Coast of British Columbia, Canada

  • L. I. Bendell-Young
  • R. C. Ydenberg


With the serious conservation concerns associated with the wild fishery and the downturn in the forestry industry, Canadian federal and provincial governments are under increasing pressure to diversify coastal community economies that previously relied on these two primary resources. The consequence is tremendous pressure to exploit yet another primary resource, the shellfishery. Common sense would suggest given our track record which demonstrates our poor ability to properly care for the natural environment that sustains these resources, new resource development should proceed cautiously. However, on the west coast of Canada, this is not the case. The shellfishery is being developed at an alarming rate with an astonishing lack of respect for the environment and without heed or thought given to the ecological consequences of such rapid development.


BRITISH COLUMBIA Paralytic Shellfish Poisoning Tidal Elevation Manila Clam Clam Population 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Boulding, E.G. 1984. Crab resistant features of burrowing bivalves; decreasing vulnerability by increasing handling time. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 70: 201–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cottom, C. 1939. Food habits of North American diving ducks. United States Department of Agriculture, Washington D.C. Technical Bulletin No. 643.Google Scholar
  3. Glude, J.B. 1964. The effect of scoter duck predation on a clam population in Dabob Bay, Washington. Proceedings of the National Shellfish Association. 55: 73–86.Google Scholar
  4. Harbo, R., Marcus, K., and Boxwell, T. 1997. Intertidal clam resources (Manila, littleneck and butter clams). Vol. 2: The southern inside waters of Vancouver Island and the British Columbia mainland. Can. Manuscript. Rep. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2418.Google Scholar
  5. Krauter, J.N., and Castagna, M. 1989. Factors affecting the growth and survival of clam seed planted in the natural environment. In Clam mariculture in North America. Developments in aquaculture and fisheries science, Vol. 19. Edited by J.J. Manzi and M. Castagna. Elsevier Science Publishers, New York, N.Y. pp. 149–200.Google Scholar
  6. Manzi, J. J. 1985. Clam Aquaculture. In Crustacean and Mollusk Aquaculture in the United States. Edited by J.V. Huner and E. Evan. Avi Publishing Company, Inc., Westport, Connecticut, pp. 275–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Mojica, R., and Nelson, W.G. 1993. Environmental effects of a hard clam (Mercenaria mercenaria) aquaculture site in the Indian River Lagoon, Florida. Aquaculture 113:313–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Nettleship, D., G.A. Sanger and RF. Springer. 1982. Marine birds: their feeding ecology and commercial fisheries relationships. Proceedings of the Pacific Seabird Group Symposium, Seattle, Washington, 6–8, January 1982.Google Scholar
  9. Palmer, A.R. 1985. Adaptive value of shell variation in Thais (or Nucella lamellose): effect of thick shells on vulnerability to and preference for crabs. Veliger 27: 349–356.Google Scholar
  10. Pearse, G. 1994. A determination of the current economic value of bivalve aquaculture in Baynes Sound, Vancouver Island and an estimation of the potential value of the industry under improved conditions. M.Sc. Thesis, Simon Fraser University, Buraaby, BC.Google Scholar
  11. Smith, T.E., R. C. Ydenberg and R. Einer. 1999. Foraging behaviour of an excavating predator, the red-rock crab (Cancer productus Randall) on the soft shell clam (Mya arenaria L.)Google Scholar
  12. Spencer, B.E., Edwards, D.B., and Millican, P.F. 1992. Protecting Manila clam (Tapes philippinarum) beds with plastic netting. Aquaculture. 105: 251–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Spencer, B.E., Kaiser, M.J., and Edwards, D.B. 1996. The effect of Manila clam cultivation on an intertidal benthic community: the early cultivation phase. Aquaculture Research 27:261–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Spencer, B.E., Kaiser, M.J., and Edwards, D.B. 1997. Ecological effects of intertidal Manila clam cultivation: observations at the end of the cultivation phase. Journal of Applied Ecology 34: 444–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Vermeer, K. and R.C. Ydenberg. 1989. The feeding ecology of marine birds in the Strait of Georgia. In: Vermeer, K. R.W. Butler (editors). The ecology and status of marine and shoreline birds in the Strait of Georgia, British Columbia. Special Publication of the Canadian Wildlife Service, Ottawa.Google Scholar
  16. Ydenberg, R.C. 1988. Foraging by diving birds. Acta XIX Congressus Internationalis Ornithologici. University of Ottawa Press, Ottawa.Google Scholar
  17. Zaklan, S.D., and R. C. Ydenberg 1997. The body-size burial depth relationship in the infaunal clam Mya arenaria. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 215: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. I. Bendell-Young
    • 1
  • R. C. Ydenberg
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesSimon Fraser UniversityBurnabyCanada

Personalised recommendations