Abstract
EValuatlon Requires Astandard, some representation specifying a baseline or criterion. Evaluating others, for example, requires standards applying to other people (Biernat & Billings, 2001); evaluating stimuli requires standards related to form, substance, and the relationship between the two. Self-evaluation likewise requires standards applying to the self. Without a criterion that in some sense represents the “good self,” people would be incapable of liking or disliking themselves, of feeling superior or inferior. Understanding self-evaluation, then, requires knowing the intricacies of standards for oneself. We’ll describe the dynamics of standards in self-awareness processes in Chapters 4, 6, and 7. In this chapter we discuss some of the basic issues surrounding standards: their nature, and their origination.
This chapter is based on a dissertation by Neal Lalwani.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Duval, T.S., Silvia, P.J. (2001). Standards of Correctness. In: Self-Awareness & Causal Attribution. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1489-3_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1489-3_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5579-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-1489-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive