Skip to main content

The Impact of Credit Scoring and Automated Underwriting on Credit Availability

  • Chapter
The Impact of Public Policy on Consumer Credit

Abstract

During the 1970s and 1980s, credit scoring and automated underwriting became widely accepted for most forms of consumer lending, other than mortgages. An implicit part of that acceptance by creditors was that scoring could enable expanded lending while maintaining or even reducing loss rates. There is little evidence—or, at least, little memory—of any serious concerns on the part of regulators or consumer activists during those years that scoring might somehow restrict access to credit for any significant subset of the population. But, in the last four or five years, such concerns have been raised more and more frequently. This paper addresses both the reasons for this change in perception, and the answer to the substantive question: How do credit scoring and automated underwriting affect access to credit by the population as a whole and by traditionally underserved segments of the population?1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Chandler, Gary G. and David C. Ewert, Discrimination on the Basis of Sex Under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, Working Paper No.8 (West Lafayette, Indiana: Krannert Graduate School of Management, Purdue University, Credit Research Center, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsia, David, “Credit Scoring and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act,” Hastings Law Journal, November 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, Edward M., An Introduction to Credit Scoring (San Rafael, California: Athena Press, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, Peter E., “The End(s) of Disparate Impact: Doctrinal Reconstruction, Fair Housing and Lending Law, and the Antidiscrimination Principle,” Emory Law Journal, Spring 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martell, Javier, Paul Panichelli, Rich Strauch, and Sally Taylor-Shoff, The Effectiveness of Scoring on Low-to-Moderate-Income and High-Minority Area Populations (San Rafael, California: Fair, Isaac and Company, Inc., 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sleath, Martin D. and Peter L. McCorkell, Lending Discrimination: Outcomes Can Be Deceiving (San Rafael, California: Fair, Isaac and Company, Inc., 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessel, David, “A Man Who Governs Credit is Denied a Toys R Us Card,” Wall Street Journal, December 14, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McCorkell, P.L. (2002). The Impact of Credit Scoring and Automated Underwriting on Credit Availability. In: Durkin, T.A., Staten, M.E. (eds) The Impact of Public Policy on Consumer Credit. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1415-2_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1415-2_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5542-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-1415-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics