Quarks as Vortices in Vacuum

  • G. Musulmanbekov


Despite the many successes of QCD much of low energy hadronic physics cannot be extracted from the first principles of the theory. Quarks were first postulated as constituents of hadrons with masses about hundreds of MeV to describe the spectroscopy of hadrons. Subsequently, it was realized that hard processes are the arena of current quark considerations with masses much lighter than the original constituent ones. Relationship between current and constituent quarks is still smooth and unclear. According to the modern picture of hadrons quark-antiquark in mesons and three valence quarks in nucleons are dressed with gluons and ”sea” quark-antiquark pairs in such a way that they become much heavier, although the dynamical mechanism of dressing is not understood definitely.


Wave Packet Polarization Field Constituent Quark Valence Quark Quark Spin 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    G. Musulmanbekov, Proc. of XVII Int. Kazimierz Meeting on Particle Theory and Phenomenology, Iowa, 1995, World Scientific, 1996, p. 347–353.Google Scholar
  2. G. Musulmanbekov Proc. of XXVI Int.Symp. on Multiparticle Dynamics, Sept. 1–5, Faro, 1996, World Scientific, 1997, p. 357–363.Google Scholar
  3. G. Musulmanbekov Nucl. Phys. Suppl.B71,1999, 117. ADSGoogle Scholar
  4. [2]
    G. Musulmanbekov, Proc. Int. Conf. on Elastic and Diffractive Scattering (VI- Hth Blois Workshop), Protvino, 1999,World Scientific, 2000, p. 433–443.Google Scholar
  5. [3]
    E. Schrodinger, ”Der stetige Ubergang von der Mikro-zur Makromechanik”, Naturwissenschaften14, 1926, 664.ADSGoogle Scholar
  6. [4]
    C.C. Yan, Am. J. Phys.,62 ,1994,) 147.ADSGoogle Scholar
  7. [5]
    J.J. Aubert et al., Nucl. Phys.293B, 1987, 740.ADSGoogle Scholar
  8. [6]
    A.C. Benvenuti et al., Phys. Lett.,237B, 1990, 599.ADSGoogle Scholar
  9. [7]
    R. Rajaraman, Phys. Rep.,21C,1975, 229.ADSGoogle Scholar
  10. [8]
    P. Vinciarelli, Acta Phys. Austriaca Suppl.15, 1976, 512.Google Scholar
  11. [9]
    W. Troost, CERN Report, 1975 (unpublished).Google Scholar
  12. [10]
    Y. Hsu, Phys. Rev.D22, 1980, 1394.ADSGoogle Scholar
  13. [11]
    T.A. Kontorova, Ya.I. Prenkel, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.8, 1938, 89Google Scholar
  14. T.A. Kontorova, Ya.I. Prenkel ibid8, 1938, 1340.MATHGoogle Scholar
  15. [12]
    R. Dashen, B.Hasslacher and a. Neveu, Phes. Rev.D10, 1974, 4114.ADSGoogle Scholar
  16. [13]
    F.J. Belinfante, Physica 6, 1939, 887.MathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  17. [14]
    H.C. Ohanian, Am. J. Phys.,54 ,1986, 500.ADSGoogle Scholar
  18. [15]
    J. Hiqbie, Am. J. Phys.,56, 1988, 378.ADSGoogle Scholar
  19. [16]
    R.P. Feynman, R. B. Leighton and M. Sands, “The Feynman Lectures on Physics”, Addison-Wesley Pub. Co. Inc., 1964, Vol.2, p.295.Google Scholar
  20. [17]
    J. Ashman, et al., Nucl. Phys.,B328, 1988, 1.ADSGoogle Scholar
  21. [18]
    W.M. Honig, Lett. Nouvo Cim.,19, 1977, 137.Google Scholar
  22. [19]
    P. Tewari, “Space Vortices of Energy and Matter”, Adarsh Press, Aligarh, 1978.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Musulmanbekov
    • 1
  1. 1.Joint Institute for Nuclear ResearchDubnaRussia

Personalised recommendations