Advertisement

Electron-Electron Coincidence Studies in Xenon with Precisely Tailored Equipment

  • Norbert Scherer
  • Volker Schmidt

Abstract

The triple-differential cross section of sequential photo double-ionization shows for small relative angle between the emitted electrons and equal or nearly equal electron energies interesting phenomena due to post-collision interaction and electron exchange. The experimental verification needs particularly tailored equipment. We present three examples.

Keywords

sequential photo double-ionization triple-differential cross section interference effects post-collision interaction 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    J. S. Briggs and V. Schmidt,J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.33, R1(2000).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    V. Schmidt,X-Ray and Inner-Shell Processes, 2000.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    L. Végh and J. H. Macek,Phys. Rev. A 50, 4031(1994).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    M. Yu. Kuchiev and S. A. Sheinerman,J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.27, 2943(1994).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    R. O. Barrachina and J. H. Macek,J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt Phys.22, 2151(1989).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    O. Schwarzkopf and V. Schmidt,J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt Phys.29, 3023(1996).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    S. J. Schaphorst, A. Jean, O. Schwarzkopf, P. Lablanquie, L. Andric, A. Huetz, J. Maeau and V. Schmidt,J. Phys. B: At Mol. Opt Phys.29, 1901(1996).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    J. Viefhaus, G. Snell, R. Hentges, M. Wiedenhöft, F. Heiser, O. Geßner and U. Becker,Phys. Rev. Lett 80, 1618(1998).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    P. Selles, J. Mazeau, P. Lablanquie, L. Malegat and A. Huetz,J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt Phys.31, L353(1998).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    M. Wiedenhöft, A. A. Wills, S. Canton, O. Nayandin, J. Viefhaus and N. Berrah, in18th International Conference on X-Ray and Inner-Shell Processes, book of abstracts, page 177(1999).Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    S. Rioual, B. Rouvellou, L. Avaldi, G. Battera, R. Camilloni, G. Stefani and G. Turri,Phys. Rev. A 61, 044702(2000).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    S. A. Sheinerman and V. Schmidt,J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.30, 1677(1997).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    H. Derenbach, Ch. Franke, R. Malutzki, A. Wachter and V. Schmidt,Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A 260, 258(1987).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    O. Schwarzkopf and V. Schmidt,J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt Phys.28, 2847(1995).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    N. Scherer, H. Lörch, T. Kerkau and V. Schmidt,Phys. Rev. Lett.82, 4615(1999).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    J. K. Swenson, C. C. Havener, N. Stolterfoht, K. Sommer and F. W. Meyer,Phys. Rev. Lett.63, 35(1989).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    S. A. Sheinerman and V. Schmidt,J. Phys. B: At Mol. Opt Phys.32, 5205(1999).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Norbert Scherer
    • 1
  • Volker Schmidt
    • 1
  1. 1.Fakultät für PhysikUniversität FreiburgFreiburgGermany

Personalised recommendations