Advertisement

Pulse Expansion and Soliton-Like Propagation of Ultrahigh Intense Short Pulse Laser

  • H. Sakagami
  • K. Mima

Abstract

Recent developments of laser technology have made it possible to generate ultrahigh intense subpicosecond pulses, and experiments are now being carried out to explore new regimes of relativistic laser-plasma interactions [1, 2, 3]. When the plasma is irradiated by such intense lasers, electrons oscillating in the field of the laser wave are strongly relativistic. It was predicted that the ultrahigh intense laser would be able to propagate into a sufficiently overdense plasma by the relativistic electron mass correction and hence decreasing the effective electron plasma frequency [4, 5, 6]. Recently, it was reported that an s-polarized wave interacting with a sharp-boundary plasma has excited an electromagnetic nonlinear pulse with relativistic amplitude propagating into the overdense plasma [7], and the transition between an opacity and a transparency regime for the propagation of the ultrahigh intense laser into overdense plasmas has been discussed [8]. The recession velocity was found to be significantly reduced due to the relaxation-oscillation of the penetration that was coupled with the electron density oscillation at the laser front. The intensity threshold for the penetration was also found to depend on both plasma density and ion dynamics that was characterized by the ion acoustic speed [9].

Keywords

Spectral Intensity Solitary Structure Recession Front Overdense Plasma Recession Velocity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    P.Main, and G.Mourou. Opt. Lett.13. 467 (1988).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    M.D.Perry, F.G.Patterson, and J.Weston, Opt. Lett.15, 381 (1990).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    F.G.Patterson, R.Gonzales, and M.D.Perry, Opt. Lett.16. 1107 (1991).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    A.I.Akhiezer, and P.V.Polovin, Sov. Phys. JETP3, 696 (1956).MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    P.Kaw, and J.Dawson, Phys. Fluids13. 472 (1970).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    A.D.Steiger, and C.H.Woods. Phys. Rev. A5, 1467 (1972).ADSGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    S.V.Bulanov, N.M.Naumova, and F.Pegoraro. Phys. Plasmas 1, 745 (1994)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    E.Lefebvre, and G.Bonnaud. Phys. Rev. Lett.74, 2002 (1995).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    H.Sakagami, and K.Mima, Phys. Rev. E54, 1870 (1996).ADSGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    C. K. BirdsalL , and A. B. Langdon: Plasma Physics via ComputerSimulation, McGraw-Hill, pp. 181–214 (1982).Google Scholar
  11. [II]
    S.Guérin, P.Mora, J.C.Adam, A.Héron, and G.Laval, Phys. Plasmas3, 2693 (1996).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    S.C.Wilks, W.L.Kruer, M.Tabak, and A.B.Langdon, Phys. Rev. Lett.69, 1383(1992).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Sakagami
    • 1
  • K. Mima
    • 2
  1. 1.Himeji Institute of TechnologyHimeji, HyogoJapan
  2. 2.Institute of Laser EngineeringOsaka UniversitySuita, OsakaJapan

Personalised recommendations