Abstract
Although divorce rates in the United States appear to be on the decline, the legal process of divorce and the psychological, social, and economic problems associated with it are still a common experience for many children. Estimates predict that over 40% of all children will be confronted with and will have to adjust to the legal divorce of their parents (Bahr, Howe, Mann, & Bahr, 1994). Yet, contrary to public perception, a substantially smaller percentage of these children will have the structure of their future custodial relationship with their parents resolved through adversarial litigation in the court system (Bahr et al., 1994). Exact projections of custody disputes determined by court litigation are difficult to calculate, but large-scale empirical studies completed in different jurisdictions have found that 6–20% of all child custody cases are eventually decided in the courtroom (Bahr et al., 1994; Maccoby & Mnookin, 1992; Melton, Petrilia, Poythress, & Slobogin, 1997; Santilla & Roberts, 1990). While contested custody disputes are thought to have the greatest negative psychological impact on the children involved, it is widely believed that the process of divorce itself is likely to generate substantial, long-term, negative psychological sequelae in children. Empirical support for this belief is substantial; empirical studies have estimated that approximately 16% of children of divorce report clinical levels of maladjustment (Fiddler & Saunders, 1988) and that children of divorce are two to three times more likely to experience emotional problems than children from intact families (Akre, 1992).1
Some reviews of the psychological literature, however, indicate that the effecst of divorce on children may not be as severe as social sciemtists and the general public orinally believed (Amato & Keith, 1991; Bricklin, 1995; Kelly, 1993).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ackerman, M. (1996). APA guidelines for child custody. Fairshare, 16, 6–15.
Akre, L. (1992). Struggling with indeterminacy: For an interdisciplinary collaboration in redefining the best interest standard. Marquette Law Review, 75, 628–640.
Amato, P., & Keith., P. (1991). Parental divorce and the well-being of children: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 26–46.
Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure, Rules 8.7., Mediation.
Arizona v. Chappie, 135 Ariz. 281, 660 P.2d 1208 (1983).
Bahr, S., Howe, J., Mann, M., & Bahr, M. (1994.) Trends in child custody awards: has the removal of the maternal preference made a difference. Family Law Quarterly, 28, 247–260.
Barefoote v. Estelle, 463 U.S. 880 (1983).
Batt, J. (1992.) Child custody disputes and beyond the best interest standard. Nova Law Review, 16, 621–640.
Beck, C., & Sales, B. (in press). A critical reappraisal of family mediation. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law.
Becker, M. (1993). Judicial discretion in child custody: The wisdom of Solomon. Illinois Bar Journal, 81, 650–660.
Bricklin, B. (Ed.). (1995). The child custody evaluation handbook: Research-based solutions and applications . New York: Brunner/Mazel.
Bricklin, B., & Elliot, G. (1995). Postdivorce issues and relevant research. In B. Bricklin (Ed.), The custody evaluation handbook: Research-based solutions and applications. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
Buchanan, C., Maccoby, E., & Dornsbusch, S. (1991). Caught between parents: dolescents’ experience in divorced homes. Child Development, 62,1008–1029.
Burt, R. (1983). Experts, custody disputes, and legal fantasy. Psychiatric Hospitals, 14, 140.
Camera, K., & Resnick, G. (1988). Intraparental conflict and cooperation: Factors moderating children’s post-divorce adjustment. In E. M. Hetherington & J. D. Arasteh (Eds.), Impact of divorce, single parenting, and stepparenting on children. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Camera, K., & Resnick, G. (1989). Styles of conflict resolution and cooperation between divorce parents: Effects on child behavior and adjustment. American Journal of Orthipsychiatry, 59, 560–574.
Clark, B. (1995). Acting in the best interest of the child: Essential components of a child custody evaluation. Family Law Quarterly, 29, 19–37.
Coons, J., Mnookin., R., & Sugarman, S. (1993). Deciding what’s best for children. Notre Dame Journal of Law and Public Policy, 7, 465–490.
Craig v. Boren, 429 U.S. 190 (1976).
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc., 113 S.Ct. 2786 (1993).
Davis, P., & Dudley, R. (1985). Family evaluations and the development of standards for child custody determination. Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems, 19, 505–515.
Dilllon, P., & Emery, R. (1996). Divorce mediation and resolution of child custody disputes: Long-term effects. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 66, 131–140.
Elster, J. (1987). Solomonic judgements: Against the best interest of the child. University of Chicago Law Review, 54, 1–40.
Emery, R., & Wyer, R. (1987). Child custody mediation and litigation: An experimental evaluation of the experience of parents. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 139–186.
Emery, R., Matthews, S., & Kitzmann, R. (1994). Child custody mediation and litigation: Parents’ satisfaction 1 year after settlement. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62,124–129.
Emery, R., Matthews, S., & Wyer, M. (1991). Child custody mediation and litigation: An experimental evaluation of the experience of parents. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 410–418.
Evans, P., & Havercamp, S. (1994). Analysis of mediatiion assumptions: Strategies to help mediators in child custody disputes. Mediation Quarterly, 11, 229–245.
Farber, D., Eskridge, W., & Frickey, P. (1993) Constitutional law: Themes for the constitution’s third century. St. Paul, MN: West.
Faust, D., & Ziskin, J. (1988). The expert witness in psychology and psychiatry. Science, 241, 31–35.
Fiddler, B., & Saunders, B. (1988). Children’s adjustment during custody disputes: Relation to custody arrangement, gender, and age of the children. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 33, 517–523.
Fineman, M. (1988). Dominant discourse, professional language, and legal change in in child custody decisionmaking. Harvard Law Review, 101, 727–774.
Frontiero v. Richardson, 411 U.S. 677 (1973).
Garska v. McCoy, 278 SE2d 357 (1979).
Gindes, M. (1995). Guidelines for child custody evaluations for psychologists: An overview and commentary. Family Law Quarterly, 29,37–62.
Goldstein, J., Freud, A., & Solnit, A. (1979). Beyond the best interest of the child. New York: Macmillan.
Grisso, T. (1986). Evaluating competencies: Forensic assessments and instruments. New York: Plenum Press.
Hester, T. (1992). The mental health professional in child custody determinations incident to divorce. Women’s Rights Law Reporter, 14,109–137.
Johnston, J. (1996). Children’s adjustment in sole custody compared to joint custody families and principles for custody decision making. Family and Concilliation Courts Review, 33, 415–425.
Johnston, J., Kline, M., & Tschann, J. (1989). Ongoing post-divorce conflict: Effects on children of joint custody and frequent access. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 59, 576–592.
Kalter, N., Kloner, A., Schreiser, S., & Okla, K. (1989). Predictions of children’s post-divorce adjustment. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 59, 605–618.
Kelly, J. (1990). Mediated and adversarial divorce resolution process: An analysis of post-divorce outcomes. San Francisco: Final Report prepared for the Fund for Research in Dispute Resolution.
Kelly, J. (1993). Current research on children’s post-divorce adjustment: No simple answers. Family and Conciliation Court Review, 31, 29–49.
Kline, M., Tschann, J., Johnston, J., & Wallerstein, J. (1989). Children’s adjustment in joint and sole physical custody families. Developmental Psychology, 25, 430–438.
Kitzmann, R., & Emery, R. (1993). Procedural justice and parent’s satisfaction in a field study of child custody dispute resolution. Law and Human Behavior, 17, 553–567.
Krauss, D., & Sales, B. (in press). Legal standards, expertise, and experts in child custody decision-making. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law.
Lavin, M., & Sales, B. D. (1998). Moral justifications for limits on expert testimony. In Stephen J. Ceci & Helene Hembrooke (Eds.), Expert witnesses in child abuse cases (pp. 59–81). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Lowery, C. (1981). Child custody decision in divorce proceeding: A survey of judges. Professional Psychology, 12, 492–498.
Maccoby, E., & Mnookin, R. (1992). Dividing the child social and legal implications of custody. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Maccoby, E., Buchanan, C., Mnookin, R„ & Dornsbusch, S. (1993). Postdivorce roles of mother and father in the lives of their children. Journal of Family Psychology, 1, 24–38.
Melton, G., Petrilia, J., Poythress, N., & Slobogin, C. (1987). Psychological evaluations for the courts. New York: Guilford Press.
Melton, G., Petrilia, J., Poythress, N., & Slobogin, C. (1997). Psychological evaluations for the courts, 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press.
Miller, G. (1993). The psychological best interest of the child. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 19, 21–35.
Mnookin, R. (1975). Child custody adjudication and judicial function in the face of indeterminacy. Law and Contemporary Problems, 39, 226–293.
Mnookin, R., & Kornhauser, A. (1979). Bargaining in the shadows of law: The case of divorce. Yale Law Journal, 88, 950–988.
Oberlander, L. (1995). Ethical responsibilities in child custody evaluations: Implications for evaluation methodology. Ethics and Behavior, 5, 311–332.
Orr v. Orr, 440 U.S. 268 (1979).
Otto, R., & Butcher, J. (1995). Computer assisted psychological assessment in child custody evaluations. Family Law Quarterly, 29, 79–96.
Palmore v. Sidotti, 466 U.S. 435 (1984).
Pearson, J., & Ring, M. (1982). Judicial decision making in contested custody cases. Journal of Family Law, 21, 703–724.
Pearson, J., & Thoennes, N. (1989). Custody after divorce: Demographic and attitudinal patterns. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 60, 233–249.
Peterson, J., & Zill, N. (1986). Marital disruptions, parent-child relationships, and behavior problems in children. Journal of Marriage and Family, 48, 295–307.
Reed v. Reed, 404 U.S. 71 (1971).
Reidy, C., Silver, L., & Carson, R. (1989). Child custody decisions: a survey of judges. Family Law Quarterly, 23, 75–90.
Rice, M. (1997). Violent offender research implications for the criminal justice system. American Psychologist, 52, 414–423.
Rohman, L., Sales, B., & Lou, M. (1990). The best interest standard in child custody decisions. In D. Weisstub (Ed.), Law and mental health: International perspectives (Vol. 5, pp. 40–90). New York: Pergamon.
Roseby, V. (1995). The use of psychological testing in a child focused approach to child custody evaluations. Family Law Quarterly, 29,97–110.
Sales, B., Manber, R., & Rohman, L. (1992). Social science research and child custody decision-making. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 1, 23–40.
Santilla, L. & Roberts, M. (1990). Custody decisions in Alabama before and after the abolition of the tender years doctrine. Law and Human Behavior, 14, 23–40.
Schlesinger v. Ballard, 419 U.S. 498 (1975).
Schneider, C. (1991). Discretion, rules, and law: Child custody and the UMDA best interest standard. Michigan Law Review, 89, 215–246.
Schultz, B., Dixon, E., Lindeberger, J., Ruther, N. (1989). Solomons sword. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Scott, E. (1992). Pluralism, parental preference, and child custody. California Law Review, 80, 615–672.
Shuman, D., & Sales, B. (1999). The admissibility of expert testimony based upon clinical judgment and scientific research. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 5, 3–15.
Shuman, D., Sales, B., & O’Connor, M. (1994). In a dim light: Admissibility of child sexual abuse memories in court. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 8, 399–406.
Stanley v. Illinois, 405 U.S. 645 (1972).
Stolberg, A., & Walsh, P. (1989). Parental and environmental determinants of children’s behavioral, affective and cognitive adjustment to divorce. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 12, 265–282.
Strong, J. (1995). Evidence law: Cases and materials, 5th ed. St Paul, MN: West.
Tschann, J., Kline, M., & Wallerstein, J. (1990). Conflict, loss, change and parent-child relationships: Predicting children’s adjustment during divorce. Journal of Divorce, 13, 1–22.
Uniform Marriage and Divorce Act. (1975). 402 9A UCA, 197–198.
Wall, J. (1994). An integrated approach to child custody. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 21, 39–57.
Wallerstein, J., & Kelly, J. (1980). Surviving the break-up: How children and parents cope with divorce. New York: Basic Books.
Weinberg v. Wiesenfeld, 420 U.S. 636 (1975).
Weitzman, L. (1985). The divorce revolution: The unexpected social and economic consequences for women and children in America. New York: Free Press.
Zaslow, M. (1988). Sex differences in children’s response to parental divorce: Research methodology and postdivorce family norms. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 58, 355–378.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Krauss, D.A., Sales, B.D. (2001). The Child Custody Standard. In: White, S.O. (eds) Handbook of Youth and Justice. The Plenum Series in Crime and Justice. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1289-9_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1289-9_21
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5480-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-1289-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive