Advertisement

Family Preservation and Reunification

How Effective a Social Policy?
  • Richard J. Gelles
Part of the The Plenum Series in Crime and Justice book series (PSIC)

Abstract

Family preservation programs are not new. They go back at least to the turn of the 20th century with the settlement house movement, Hull House, and Jane Addams. Family preservation programs are designed to help children and families, including extended and adoptive families, that are at risk of abuse or delinquency, or are in crisis.

Keywords

Child Abuse Child Welfare Foster Care Child Welfare System Reasonable Effort 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barthel, J. (1991). For children’s sake: The promise of family preservation. New York: Edna McConnell Clark Foundation.Google Scholar
  2. Berkowitz, S. (1991). Findings from the state survey component of the study of high risk child abuse and neglect groups. Rockville, MD: Westat.Google Scholar
  3. Bowlby. J. (1958). The nature of the child’s tie to his mother. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 39, 350–373.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss. Vol. 1 Attachment. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  5. Doueck, H. J., English, D. J., DePanfilis, D., & Moore, G.T. (1993). Decision-making in child protective services: A comparison of selected risk-assessment systems. Child Welfare, 72, 441–452.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Forsythe, P. (1992). Homebuilders and family preservation. Children and Youth Services Review, 14. 37–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gelles, R. (1973). Child abuse as psychopathology: A sociological critique and reformulation. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 43, 611–621.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gelles, R. J. (1991). Physical violence, child abuse, and child homicide: A continuum of violence, or distinct behaviors? Human Nature, 2, 59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gelles, R. J. (1996). The book of David: How preserving families can cost children’s lives. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  10. Gil, D. (1970). Violence against children: Physical child abuse in the United States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.Google Scholar
  11. Harlow, H. (1958). The nature of love. American Psychologist, 13, 673–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Harlow, H. (1961). The development of affection patterns in infant monkeys. In B. M. Foss (ed.), Determinants of infant behavior (vol. 1, pp. 75–88). London: Metheun.Google Scholar
  13. Heneghan, A. M., Horwitz, S. M., & Leventhal, J. M. (1996). Evaluating intensive family preservation programs: A methodological review. Pediatrics, 97, 535–542.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Kempe, C. H., Silverman, F. N., Steele, B. R, Droegemueller, W., & Silver, H. K. (1962). The battered child syndrome. Journal of the American Medical Association, 181, 107–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lawton, K. A. (1996). Controversial program tries to keep endangered kids out of foster homes. The American News Service. Release number 1996–09–06.Google Scholar
  16. Lindsey, D. (1994). The welfare of children. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. MacDonald, H. (1994). The ideology of “family preservation.” The Public Interest, 115, 45–60.Google Scholar
  18. Notkin, Susan. (1996). Letter to the editor. Wall Street Journal, 6 June: 1, p. 15.Google Scholar
  19. Parke, R. D., & Collmer, C. W. (1975). Child abuse: an interdisciplinary analysis. In M. Hetherington (Ed.), Review of child development research (vol. 5, pp. 1–102). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  20. Pelton, L. (1989). For reasons of poverty: A critical analysis of the public child welfare system in the United States. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  21. Prochaska, J. O. & DiClemente, C.C. (1982). Toward a more integrative model of change. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 19, 276–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Prochaska, J. O., & DiClemente, C.C. (1983). Stages and processes of self-change in smoking: Toward an integrative model of change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 5,390–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Prochaska, J. O., & DiClemente, C.C. (1984). The transtheoretical approach: Crossing traditional boundaries of change. Homewood, IL: Dow Jones/Irwin.Google Scholar
  24. Prochaska, J. O, Norcross, J. C, & DiClemente, C. C. (1994). Changing for good. New York: Morrow.Google Scholar
  25. Rosenfeld, A., & Newberger, E. H. (1977). Compassion vs. control: Conceptual and practical pitfalls in the broadened definition of child abuse. Journal of the American Medical Association, 237, 2086–2088.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rossi, J.S. (1992, March). Stages of change for 15 health risk behaviors in an HMO population. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, New York.Google Scholar
  27. Schuerman, J., Rzepnicki, T. L., & Littell, J. H. (1994). Putting families first: An experiment in family preservation. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  28. Tatara, T. (1993). Characteristics of children in substitute and adoptive care. Washington, DC: Voluntary Cooperative Information System, American Public Welfare Association.Google Scholar
  29. United States Congress. (1980). Adoption Assistance and Child Welfare Act (PL 96-272). 42 USC, 620–628, 670–679(a) (1988, Supp I).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard J. Gelles
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for the Study of Youth Policy, School of Social WorkUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations