Abstract
In this chapter we examine the role of behavioral scientists as reporters of research findings that may be contrary to public knowledge and expectations. The research to be examined relates to the suggestibility of children’;s memory and was prompted in part by the recent flood of highly publicized and horrifying accusations of child sexual abuse in this country and abroad. Specifically, the discussion focuses on the contrast between public perceptions of children’;s testimonial competence versus actual research findings about children’;s vulner-ability to suggestion.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Boat, B. W., & Everson, M. D. (1993). The use of anatomical dolls in sexual abuse evaluations: Current research and practice. In G. S. Goodman & B. L. Bottoms (Eds.), Child victims, child witnesses (pp. 47–69). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Brown, M. R. (1926). Legal psychology. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
Bruck, M., & Ceci, S. J. (1995). Amicus brief for the case of State of New Jersey v. Margaret Kelly Michaels presented by committee of concerned social scientists. Psychology, Public Policy and the Law, 1, 272–322.
Bruck, M., Ceci, S. J., Francoeur, E., & Renick, R. (1995). “I hardly cried when I got my shot!” Influencing children’;s reports about a visit to their pediatrician. Child Development, 66,193–208.
Ceci, S. J., & Bruck, M. (1993a). Child witnesses: Translating research into policy. SRCD Social Policy Report, 7 (3), 1–30.
Ceci, S. J., & Bruck, M. (1993b). The suggestibility of children’;s recollections: A historical review and synthesis.Psychological Bulletin, 113, 403–439.
Ceci, S. J., & Bruck, M. (1995). Jeopardy in the courtroom: A scientific analysis of children’;s testimony. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Books.
Ceci, S. J., Huffman, M. L. C., Smith, E., & Loftus, E. (1994a). Repeatedly thinking about a non-event: Source misattributions among preschoolers. Consciousness and Cognition, 3, 388–407.
Ceci, S. J., Loftus, E. F., Leichtman, M. D., & Bruck, M. (1994b). The possible role of source misattributions in the creation of false beliefs among preschoolers. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 42(4), 304–320.
Ceci, S., Hembrooke, H., & Masnick, A. (in preparation). Cryptoplagiarism: Oppositely valenced developmental processes.
Cutler, B. L., Penrod, S. D., & Stuve, T. E. (1988). Juror decision making in eyewitness identification cases. Law and Human Behavior, 12(1), 41–55.
Duggan, L. M., Aubrey, M., Doherty, E., Isquith, P., Levine, M, & Scheiner, J. (1989). The credibility of children as witnesses in a simulated child sex abuse trial. In S. J. Ceci, D. F. Ross, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Perspectives on the child witness (pp. 71–79). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Goodman, G. S., & Aman, C. (1990). Children’;s use of anatomically detailed dolls to recount an event. Child Development, 61, 1859–1871.
Goodman, G. S., Aman, C., & Hirschman, J. E. (1987a). Child sexual and physical abuse: Children’;s testimony. In S. J. Ceci, M. P. Toglia, & D. F. Ross (Eds.), Children’;s eyewitness memory (pp. 1–23). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Goodman, G. S., Golding, J. M., Helgeson, V. S., Haith, M. M., & Michelli, J. (1987b). When a child takes the stand: Jurors’; perceptions of children’;s eyewitness testimony. Law and Human Behavior, 11(1), 27–40.
Goodman, G. S., Bottoms, B. L., Herscovici, B. B., & Shaver, P. (1989). Determinants of the child victim’;s perceived credibility. In S. J. Ceci, D. F. Ross, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Perspectives on the child witness (pp. 1–22). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Huffman, M. L. C. (1997). Individual differences in children’;s suggestibility for morally charged events. (Doctoral dissertation, Cornell University, 1997). Dissertation Abstracts International, 58(4-B), 2154.
Huffman, M. L. C., Crossman, A. M., & Ceci, S. J. (1996). An investigation of the long-term effects of source misattribution error: Are false memories permanent? Presentation at the Biennial meeting of the American Psychology-Law Society. Hilton Head, SC.
Kendall-Tackett, K. A., Williams, L. M., & Finkelhor, D. (1993). Impact of sexual abuse on children: A review and synthesis of recent empirical studies. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 164–180.
Kreutzer, M. A., Leonard, S. C., & Flavell, J. H. (1975). An interview study of children’;s knowledge about memory. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 40(1), 1–57.
Leichtman, M. D., & Ceci, S. J. (1995). The effect of stereotypes and suggestions on preschoolers’; reports. Developmental Psychology, 31(4), 568–596.
Leippe, M. R., & Romanczyk, A. (1987). Children on the witness stand: A communication/persuasion analysis of jurors’; reactions to child witnesses. In S. J. Ceci, M. P. Toglia, & D. F. Ross (Eds.), Children’;s eyewitness memory (pp. 155–177). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Leippe, M. R., & Romanczyk, A. (1989). Reactions to child (versus adult) eyewitnesses: The Influence of jurors’; preconceptions and witness behavior. Law and Human Behavior, 13(2), 103–132.
Lindsay, R. C. L., Wells, G. L., & O’;Connor, F. J. (1989). Mock-juror belief of accurate and inaccurate eyewitnesses: A replication and extension. Law and Human Behavior, 13(3), 333–339.
Luus, C. A. E., Wells, G. L., & Turtle, J. W (1995). Child eyewitnesses: Seeing is believing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(2), 317–326.
Nightingale, N. N. (1993). Juror reactions to child victim witnesses: Factors affecting trial outcome. Law and Human Behavior, 17(6), 679–694.
Rein, M., & Winship, C. (1999). The dangers of “strong” causal reasoning in social policy. Society, 36, 38–46.
Ross, D. F, Dunning, D., Toglia, M. P., & Ceci, S. J. (1990). The child in the eyes of the jury: Assessing mock jurors’; perceptions of the child witness. Law and Human Behavior, 14(1), 5–23.
Terr, L. (1994). Unchained memories: True stories of traumatic memories lost and found. New York: Basic Books.
Wells, G. L., Turtle, J. W, & Luus, C. A. E. (1989). The perceived credibility of child eyewitnesses: What happens when they use their own words? In S. J. Ceci, D. F. Ross, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Perspectives on children’;s testimony (pp. 23–46). New York: Springer-Verlag.
White, T. L., Leichtman, M. D., & Ceci, S. J. (1997). The good, the bad, and the ugly: Accuracy, inaccuracy, and elaboration in preschoolers’; reports about a past event. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, S37-S54.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ceci, S.J., Huffman, M.L., Crossman, A., Scullin, M., Gilstrap, L. (2001). How Reliable are Children’s Memories?. In: White, S.O. (eds) Handbook of Youth and Justice. The Plenum Series in Crime and Justice. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1289-9_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1289-9_17
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5480-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-1289-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive