The Social Functions of Attributional Face Saving Tactics

  • Jaana Juvonen
Part of the Plenum Series on Human Exceptionality book series (SSHE)


School is a not only a forum for learning and achievement but is also an important social arena. Students respond to teacher directions, negotiate informal norms of conduct among classmates, argue and resolve conflicts as well as form friendships with another (e.g., Juvonen & Wentzel, 1996). In this chapter, I examine how students manage their public images in ways that promote social approval in the context of the classroom (cf. Baumeister, 1982; Leary & Kowalski, 1990). What is of specific interest is how students may try to “save face” as they do poorly in school.


Impression Management Social Approval Effort Account Impression Management Tactic Effort Attribution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Baumeister, R. F. (1982). A self-presentational view of social phenomena. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barker, G. P., & Graham, S. (1987). Developmental study of praise and blame as attributional cues. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 62–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Covington, M. V., & Omelich, C. L. (1979). Effort: The double-edged sword in school achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 446–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Frankel, A., & Snyder, M. L. (1978). Poor performance following unsolvable problems: Learned helplessness or egotism? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1415–1423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor.Google Scholar
  6. Graham, S., & Barker, G. P. (1990). The down side of help: An attributional-developmental analysis of helping behavior as a low ability cue. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 7–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jones, E. E., & Pittman, T. S. (1982). Toward a general theory of strategic self-presentation. In J. Suls (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on self (Vol. 1, pp. 231–262). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  8. Juvonen, J. (1996). Self-presentation tactics promoting teacher and peer approval: The function of excuses and other clever explanations. In J. Juvonen & K. R. Wentzel (Eds). Social motivation: Understanding children’s school adjustment (pp.43–65). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Juvonen, J., & Murdock, T. B. (1993). How to promote social approval: Effect of audience and outcome on publicly communicated attributions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 365–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Juvonen, J., & Murdock, T. B. (1995). Grade-level differences in the social value of effort: Implications for self-presentation tactics of early adolescents. Child Development, 66, 1694–1705.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Juvonen, J., & Wentzel, K. R. (1996). Social motivation: Understanding children’s school adjustment. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Leary, M. R., & Kowalski, R. M. (1990). Impression management: A literature review and two-component model. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 34–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Panday, J. (1981). A note on social power through ingratiation among workers. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 54, 65–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Schlenker, B. R., & Leary, M. R. (1982). Audiences’ reactions to self-enhancing, self-denigrating, and accurate self-presentations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 89–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Snyder, C. R., & Higgins, R. L. (1988). Excuses: Their effective role in negotiation of reality. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 23–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Weiner, B. (1992). Excuses in everyday interaction. In M. L. McLaughlin, M. J. Cody, & S. J. Read (Eds.), Explaining one’s self to others: Reason-giving in a social context (pp. 131–146). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  19. Weiner, B. (1995). Judgments of responsibility: Foundations for a theory of social conduct. New York: Guildford Press.Google Scholar
  20. Weiner, B., Amrikhan, J., Folkes, V. S., & Verette, J. (1987). An attributional analysis of excuse giving: Studies of naive theory of emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 316–324.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Weiner, B., Figuroa-Munoz, A., & Kakihara, C. (1991). The goals of excuses and communication strategies related to causal perceptions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 4–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Weiner, B., & Kukla, A. (1970). An attributional analysis of achievement motivations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 15, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jaana Juvonen
    • 1
  1. 1.University of California at Los AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations