Taxonomic Selectivity in Surviving Introduced Insects in the United States

  • Diego P. Vázquez
  • Daniel Simberloff

Abstract

Although ecologists have understood the importance of invasions since the publication of Elton's book (1958), the factors important to the survival and impact of introduced species are still poorly understood. Several factors can determine whether a species arrives and thrives in a new location. Firstly, the opportunity for colonisation is important. Obviously, a species may have all the traits that would predispose it to prosper in a particular location, but, if it cannot get there, no invasion will occur. Clearly, some species will be introduced more often than others will. For example, the fact that there has been historically more traffic between Europe and North America than between Africa and North America gave European species more opportunities for spread to North America (Sailer 1983).

Keywords

Europe Germinate Broom Plague 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Arnett, R. S. 1985. American Insects: A Handbook of the Insects of America North of Mexico. Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
  2. Baker, H. G. 1965. Characteristics and modes of origin of weeds. In: The Genetics of Colonizing Species (Baker, H. G., and Stebbins, C. L., eds.). Academic Press, Pp: 147-169.Google Scholar
  3. B.C.D.C. 1999. Releases of Beneficial Organisms in the U.S. and Territories Database (ROBO). Biological Control Documentation Center, < http://www.arsgrin.gov/nigrp/robo.html>.Google Scholar
  4. Borror, D. J., de Long, D. M., Triplehorn, C. A. 1989. An Introduction to the Study of Insects, sixth edition. Saunders College Publishing.Google Scholar
  5. Caltagirone, L. E., and Doutt, R. L. 1989. The history of the vedalia beetle importation to California and its impact on the development of biological control. Annual Review of Entomology 34:1-16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chown, S. L., N.J.M. Gremmen, and K.J. Gaston. 1998. Ecological biogeography of southern ocean islands: species-area relationships, human impacts, and conservation. American Naturalist 152:562-575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clausen, C. P. (ed.) 1978. Introduced Parasites and Predators of Arthropod Pests and Weeds: A World Review. United States Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Handbook No. 480.Google Scholar
  8. Daehler, C. C. 1998. The taxonomic distribution of invasive angiosperm plants: ecological insights and comparison to agricultural weeds. Biological Conservation 84:167-180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Elton, C. S. 1958. The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants. Methuen.Google Scholar
  10. Faith, D. P. 1992. Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity. Biological Conservation 61:1-10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Frank, J. H., E.D. McCoy, H.G. Hall, G.F. O'Meara, and W.R. Tschinkel. 1997. Immigration and introduction of insects. In: Strangers in Paradise: Impact and Management of Non-indigenous Species in Florida (D. Simberloff, D.C. Schmitz, and T. Brown, eds.). Island Press, Pp: 75-99.Google Scholar
  12. Gauld, I., and Bolton, B. (eds.). 1988. The Hymenoptera. British Museum (National History), Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hawkins, B. A., and P.C. Marino. 1997. The colonization of native phytophagous insects in North America by exotic parasitoids. Oecologia 112:566-571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hopper, K. R., and R.T. Roush. 1993. Mate finding, dispersal, number released, and the success of biological control introductions. Ecological Entomology 18:321-331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Howarth, F. G. 1991. Environmental impacts of classical biological control. Annual Review of Entomology 36:485-509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kim, K. C. 1991. North American Non-Indigenous Arthropod Database. United States Department of Agriculture-Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, <http://www.exoticforestpests.org/rppc>.Google Scholar
  17. Kim, K. C., and A.G. Wheeler, Jr. 1991. Pathways and Consequences of the Introduction of Non-indigenous Insects and Arachnids in the United States. Report to the United States Congress Office of Technology Assessment (Contract # H3-6115.0).Google Scholar
  18. Lattin, J. D. 1999. Bionomics of Anthocoridae. Annual Review of Entomology 44:207-231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lawton, J. H., and K.C. Brown. 1986. The population and community ecology of invading insects. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 314:607-617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Leston, D. 1957. Spread potential and the colonisation of islands. Systematic Zoology 6:41-46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lewis, R. E. 1995. Fleas (Siphonaptera). In: Medical Insects and Arachnids (Lane, R. P., and Crosskey, R. W., eds.). Chapman & Hall, Pp: 529-575.Google Scholar
  22. Lindroth, C. H. 1957. The Faunal Connections between Europe and North America. Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
  23. Lockwood, J. L. 1999. Using taxonomy to predict success among introduced avifauna: relative importance of transport and establishment. Conservation Biology 13:560-567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lonsdale, W. M. 1999. Global patterns of plant invasions and the concept of invasibility. Ecology 80:1522-1536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Manly, B. F. J. 1997. Randomization, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology. Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
  26. Obrycki, J. J., and T.J. Kring. 1998. Predaceous Coccinellidae in biological control. Annual Review of Entomology 43:295-321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Parker, I. M., D. Simberloff, W.M. Lonsdale, K. Goodell, M. Wonham, P.M. Kareiva, M. , Williamson, B. Von Holle, P.B. Moyle, J.E. Byers, L. and Goldwasser. 1999. Impact: Toward a framework for understanding the ecological effects of invaders. Biological Invasions 1:Google Scholar
  28. Parker, S. P. (ed.). 1982. Synopsis and Classification of Living Organisms. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  29. Pysek, P. 1998. Is there a taxonomic pattern to plant invasions? Oikos 82:282-294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Quammen, D. 1998. Planet of weeds. Harper's 297:57-69.Google Scholar
  31. Rice, W. R. 1989. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223-225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rejmánek, M. 1996. A theory of seed plant invasiveness: the first sketch. Biological Conservation 78:171-181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sailer, R. I. 1983. History of insect introductions. Pp. 15-38 In: Exotic Plant Pests and North American Agriculture (Graham, C., and Wilson, C., eds.). Academic Press.Google Scholar
  34. Simberloff, D. 1986. Introduced insects: A biogeographic and systematic perspective. In: Ecology of Biological Invasions of North America and Hawaii (Mooney, H. A., and Drake, J. A., eds.). Springer-Verlag, Pp: 3-26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Simberloff, D. 1989. Which insect introductions succeed and which fail? In: Biological Invasions: A Global Perspective (Drake, J. A., Mooney, H. A., di Castri, F., Groves, R. H., Kruger, F. J., Rejmánek, M., and Williamson, M., eds.). John Wiley & Sons, Pp: 61-72.Google Scholar
  36. Sokal, R. R., and J.F. Rohlf. 1995. Biometry. W. H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
  37. Whitfield, J. B. 1998. Phylogeny and evolution of host-parasitoid interactions in Hymenoptera. Annual Review of Entomology 43:129-151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Williamson, M. 1996. Biological Invasions. Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
  39. Williamson, M. H., and A. Fitter. 1996. The characteristics of successful invaders. Biological Conservation 78:163-170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zar, J. H. 1996. Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Diego P. Vázquez
    • 1
  • Daniel Simberloff
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of TennesseeKnoxvilleU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations