A Cladistic Analysis of Austrophlebioides and Related Genera (Leptophlebiidae: Atalophlebiinae)

  • Faye Christidis

Abstract

Phylogenetic relationships among the Australian genera and species of the Meridialaris lineage were investigated using a eladistic analysis of 35 morphological characters, to test the monophyly of this group and determine possible placement of undescribed taxa. The monophyly of a clade containing the three Australian genera of the Meridialaris lineage, Austrophlebioides Campbell and Suter, Kirrara Harker and Tillyardophlebia Dean, was strongly supported. Several undescribed species formed a monophyletic group with Austrophlebioides pusillus (Harker), suggesting the placement of these species in Austrophlebioides. The placement of several other undescribed taxa, not easily accommodated in currently recognised genera, is discussed. The outcomes from the parsimony analysis of the Australian genera agree in part with Pescador and Peters’(1980) phylogeny.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Campbell, I. C. 1993. A new genus and species of leptophlebiid mayfly (Ephemeroptera: Leptophlebiidae: Atalophlebiinae) from tropical Australia. Aquat. Insects 15: 159–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Campbell, I. C. and W. L. Peters. 1986. Redefinition of Kirrara Harker with a redescription of Kirram procera Harker (Ephemeroptera: Leptophlebiidae: Atalophlebiinae). Aquat. Insects 8: 71–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Campbell, I. C. and W. L. Peters. 1993..A revision of the Australian Ephemeroptera genus Atalomicria Harker (Leptophlebiidae: Atalophlebiinae). Aquat. Insects 15: 89–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Campbell, I. C. and P. J. Suter. 1988. Three new genera, a new subgenus and a new species of Leptophlebiidae (Ephemeroptera) from Australia. J. Aust. ent. Soc. 27: 259–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dean, J. C. 1987. Two new genera of Leptophlebiidae (Insecta: Ephemeroptera) from south-western Australia. Mem. Mus. Vict. 48: 91–100.Google Scholar
  6. Dean, J. C. 1988. Description of a new genus of leptophlebiid mayfly from Australia (Ephemeroptera: Leptophlebiidae: Atalophlebiinae). Proc. R. Soc. Vict. 100: 39–45.Google Scholar
  7. Dean, J. C. 1997. Description of new Leptophlebiidae (Insecta: Ephemeroptera) from Australia. I. Tdlyardophlebia gen. nov. Mem. Mus. Vict. 56: 83–89.Google Scholar
  8. Edmunds G. F. (Jr.), S. L. Jensen and L. Berner. 1976. The mayflies of North and Central America. 330 pp. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
  9. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hillis, D. M. and J. J. Bull. 1993. An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42: 182–192.Google Scholar
  11. Parnrong, S. and I. C. Campbell. 1997. Two new species of Austrophlebioides Campbell and Suter (Ephemeroptera: Leptophlebiidae) from Australia, with notes on the genus. Aust. J. ent. 36: 121– 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Pescador, M. L. and W. L. Peters. 1980. Phylogenetic relationships and zoogeography of cool-adapted Leptophlebiidae (Ephemeroptera) in Southern South America, pp. 43–56. In: J. F. Flannagan and K. E. Marshall (eds.). Advances in Ephemeroptera Biology. Plenum, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pescador, M. L. and W. L. Peters. 1982. Four new genera of Leptophlebiidae (Ephemeroptera: Atalophlebiinae) from southern South America. Aquat. Insects 4: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Pescador, M. L. and W. L. Peters. 1987. Revision of the genera Meridialaris and Massartellopsis (Ephemeroptera: Leptophlebiidae: Atalophlebiinae) from South America. Trans. Amer. ent. Soc: 112:147–189.Google Scholar
  15. Peters, W. L. and G. F. Edmunds (Jr.). 1990. A new genus and species of Leptophlebiidae: Atalophlebiinae from the Celebes (Sulawesi) (Ephemeroptera), pp. 327–335. In: I. C. Campbell (ed.). Mayflies and Stoneflies:life histories and biology. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Suter, P. J. 1986. The Ephemeroptera (Mayflies) of South Australia. Rec. S. Aust. Mus. 19: 339–397.Google Scholar
  17. Swofford, D. L. 1993. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (PAUP), version 3.1.1. Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign.Google Scholar
  18. Towns, D. R. and W. L. Peters. 1980. Phylogenetic relationships of the Leptophlebiidae of New Zealand (Ephemeroptera), pp. 57–69. In: J. F. Flannagan and K. E. Marshall (eds.). Advances in Ephemeroptera Biology. Plenum, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Towns, D. R. and W. L. Peters. 1996. Leptophlebiidae. Fauna of New Zealand 36:1–143.Google Scholar
  20. Tsui, P. T. P. and W. L. Peters. 1975. The comparative morphology and phylogeny of certain Gondwanian Leptophlebiidae based on the thorax, tentorium, and abdominal terga (Ephemeroptera). Trans. Amer. ent. Soc. 101: 505–595.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Faye Christidis
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Zoology and Tropical EcologyJames Cook UniversityTownsvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations