Aroma Compounds—Proteins Interaction Using Headspace Techniques

  • E. Jouenne
  • J. Crouzet
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 488)

Abstract

Interactions between volatile compounds and proteins in aqueous solution, were studied using static and dynamic headspace techniques. The decrease of aroma compounds concentration in the headspace determined in static mode indicates a retention by 0-lactoglobulin, 2.4% (w/w), pH 3.4, 25 °C, varying from 8 to 60% for most of the compounds tested. However 2-hexanone and isoamyl acetate are not significantly retained by the protein and a salting-out effect is noticed for limonene. On the basis of these preliminary results the intensity of interactions of methyl ketones (C7 to C9), ethyl esters (C6 to C9), limonene and myrcene and ß-lactoglobulin for different pH values (2.0 to 11.0) were estimated by the determination of the infinite dilution activity coefficients (yi) by exponential dilution. For a constant pH value, the relative activity coefficient in the presence of 0-lactoglobulin (yr) of methyl ketones decreases significantly with the hydrophobicity of the volatiles whereas the relative activity coefficient value reaches a minimum for ethyl octanoate in the ester series. For limonene and myrcene an increase of yr is generally noticed whereas a decrease occurs in the presence of sodium casemate and bovine serum albumin. The variations of relative activity coefficient according to the pH of the medium can be related to structural modifications of the ß-lactoglobulin.

Keywords

Ethyl Foam Volatility Benzaldehyde Retinol 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. 1.
    Solms, J., Osman-Ismail, F., and Beyeler, M. The interaction of volatiles with food components.Can. Inst. Food Sci. Technol. J1973, 6, A10–A16.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Maier, H.G. Binding of volatile aroma substances to nutrients and foodstuffs. InAroma Research;Maarse, H., and Groenen, P.J., Eds., Pudoc: Wageningen. 1975, 143–157. Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Langourieux, S., and Crouzet, J. Study of aroma compounds-polysaccharides interactions by dynamic exponential dilution.Lehensm. Wiss.u. Technol.199427544–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kinsella, J.E., Damadoran, S., Kinsella, J.E., and Damadoran, S. Flavor problems in soy proteins: Origin, nature, control and binding phenomena. InThe analysis und control of less desirable flavors in foods and beverages.Charalambous, G. Academic Press: New York. 1980, 95–131.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    O’Neill, T. Flavor binding by food proteins: an overview. InFlavor food interactionsMcGorrin, R.J., and Leland, J.V., Eds., American Chemical Society: Washington D.C. 1996, 59–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Langourieux, S. Interactionligand-recepteur: cas des composes d’arnome en solutions aqueuses. PhD Thesis. Université de Montpellier 2, 1993.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    O’Neill, T., and Kinsella, J.E. Binding of alkanone flavors to ß-lactoglobulin: effects of conformational and chemical modificationJ Agric. Food Chem.1987 35 770–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fugate, R.D., and Song, P.S. Spectroscopic characterization of f3-lactoglobulin-retinol complex.Biochim. Biophys. Acta198062528–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Duhem, P., and Vidal, J. Extension of the dilution method to measurements of high activity coefficients at infinite dilution.Fluid Phase Equilibria.19782231–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sadafian, A., and Crouzet, J. Infinite dilution activity coefficients and relative volatilities of some aroma compounds.Flay. Fragr. J19872103–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sadafian, A., and Crouzet, J. Interactions entre composés terpéniques et protéines.In Progress in Terpene Chemistry.Joulain, D., Ed., Editions Frontières: Gif Sur Yvette, 1986, 165–175.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Molinari, H., Ragona, L., Varani, L., Musco, G., Consonni, R., Zetta, L., and Monaco, H.L. Partially folded structure of monomeric bovine 13-lactoglobulin.FEBS Letters1996381237–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Robillard, K.A., and Wishnia, A. Aromatic hydrophobes and B-lactoglobulin A. Thermodynamics of binding.Biochem.1972113835–3840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dufour, E., and Haertle, T. Binding affinities of (3-ionone and related flavor compounds to 13lactoglobulin effects of chemical modifications.J Agric. Food Chem.1990381691–1695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ragona, L., Pusterla, E, Zetta, L., Monaco, H.L., and Molinari, H. XXXIdentification of a conserved hydrophobic cluster in partially folded bovine (3-lactoglobulin at pH 2. Folding & Design19972281–290.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Charles, M., Bernal, B., and Guichard, E. Interactions of (3-lactoglogulin with flavour compounds. InFlavour Science. Recent Developments.Taylor, A.J., and Mottram, D.S., Eds., The Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge. 1996, 433–436.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. Jouenne
    • 1
  • J. Crouzet
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratoire de Genie Biologique et Sciences des AlimentsEquipe de Microbiologie et Biochimie Industrielles associée a l’INRA Université de Montpellier IIMontpellier CedeX 05France

Personalised recommendations