Aroma Compounds—Proteins Interaction Using Headspace Techniques
Interactions between volatile compounds and proteins in aqueous solution, were studied using static and dynamic headspace techniques. The decrease of aroma compounds concentration in the headspace determined in static mode indicates a retention by 0-lactoglobulin, 2.4% (w/w), pH 3.4, 25 °C, varying from 8 to 60% for most of the compounds tested. However 2-hexanone and isoamyl acetate are not significantly retained by the protein and a salting-out effect is noticed for limonene. On the basis of these preliminary results the intensity of interactions of methyl ketones (C7 to C9), ethyl esters (C6 to C9), limonene and myrcene and ß-lactoglobulin for different pH values (2.0 to 11.0) were estimated by the determination of the infinite dilution activity coefficients (yi) by exponential dilution. For a constant pH value, the relative activity coefficient in the presence of 0-lactoglobulin (yr) of methyl ketones decreases significantly with the hydrophobicity of the volatiles whereas the relative activity coefficient value reaches a minimum for ethyl octanoate in the ester series. For limonene and myrcene an increase of yr is generally noticed whereas a decrease occurs in the presence of sodium casemate and bovine serum albumin. The variations of relative activity coefficient according to the pH of the medium can be related to structural modifications of the ß-lactoglobulin.
KeywordsEthyl Foam Volatility Benzaldehyde Retinol
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Solms, J., Osman-Ismail, F., and Beyeler, M. The interaction of volatiles with food components.Can. Inst. Food Sci. Technol. J1973, 6, A10–A16.Google Scholar
- 2.Maier, H.G. Binding of volatile aroma substances to nutrients and foodstuffs. InAroma Research;Maarse, H., and Groenen, P.J., Eds., Pudoc: Wageningen. 1975, 143–157. Google Scholar
- 4.Kinsella, J.E., Damadoran, S., Kinsella, J.E., and Damadoran, S. Flavor problems in soy proteins: Origin, nature, control and binding phenomena. InThe analysis und control of less desirable flavors in foods and beverages.Charalambous, G. Academic Press: New York. 1980, 95–131.Google Scholar
- 6.Langourieux, S. Interactionligand-recepteur: cas des composes d’arnome en solutions aqueuses. PhD Thesis. Université de Montpellier 2, 1993.Google Scholar
- 11.Sadafian, A., and Crouzet, J. Interactions entre composés terpéniques et protéines.In Progress in Terpene Chemistry.Joulain, D., Ed., Editions Frontières: Gif Sur Yvette, 1986, 165–175.Google Scholar
- 15.Ragona, L., Pusterla, E, Zetta, L., Monaco, H.L., and Molinari, H. XXXIdentification of a conserved hydrophobic cluster in partially folded bovine (3-lactoglobulin at pH 2. Folding & Design19972281–290.Google Scholar
- 16.Charles, M., Bernal, B., and Guichard, E. Interactions of (3-lactoglogulin with flavour compounds. InFlavour Science. Recent Developments.Taylor, A.J., and Mottram, D.S., Eds., The Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge. 1996, 433–436.Google Scholar