Skip to main content

Cultures as Supraorganismal Wholes

  • Chapter
Book cover Perspectives in Ethology

Part of the book series: Perspectives in Ethology ((PEIE,volume 13))

Abstract

What do we mean by culture? This question has much in common with some that have been asked in the philosophy of taxonomy. The idea that species are not kinds of organisms, but rather wholes composed of organisms, suggests that cultural units may likewise be wholes made up of parts. If so, they are individuals rather than classes in an ontological sense. There are some very strong analogies between biological species and certain cultural units, especially languages. But there are also important differences, and identifying the wholes and their parts can be difficult. This contribution explores some of the possibilities, especially the relation of compatibility among the parts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. X (1985).Culture and the evolutionary process.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cafagna, A. C. (1960). A formal analysis of definitions of “culture.” In G. E. Dole & R. L. Carneiro (Eds.),Essays in the science of culture in honor of Leslie A. White(pp. 111–132). New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Andrade, R. (1995).The development of cognitive anthropology.Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dupré, J. (1993).The disorder of things: Metaphysical foundations of the disunity of science.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durham, W. H. (1990). Advances in evolutionary culture theory.Annual Review of Anthropology, 19,187–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durham, W. H. (1991).Coevolution: Genes, culture, and human diversity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firth, J. R. (1957). Ethnographic analysis and language with reference to Malinowski’s views. In R. Firth (Ed.),Man and culture: An evaluation of the work of Bronislaw Malinowski(pp. 93–118). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin, M. T. (1974a). A radical solution to the species problem.Systematic Zoology, 23, 536–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin, M. T. (1974b).The economy of nature and the evolution of sex.Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin, M. T. (1997).Metaphysics and the origin of species. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyes, C. M., & Plotkin, H. C. (1989). Replicators and interactors in cultural evolution. In M. Ruse (Ed.),What the philosophy of biology is: Essays dedicated to David Hull(pp. 139–172). Dordrecht, Holland: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D. L. (1988a). Interactors versus vehicles. In H. C. Plotkin (Ed.),The role of behavior in evolution(pp. 19–50). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D. L. (1988b).Science as a process: An evolutionary account of the social and conceptual development of science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keesing, R. M. (1974). Theories of culture.Annual Review of Anthropology, 3, 73–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kluckhohn, C., & Kelly, W. H. (1945). The concept of culture. In R. Linton (Ed.),The science of man in the world crisis(pp. 78–106). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroeber, A. L., & Kluckhohn, C. (1952).Papers of the Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University: Volume 47, No. 1. Culture: A critical review of concepts and definitions.Cambridge, MA: Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landa, J. T. (1994).Trust, ethnicity, and identity.Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumsden, C. J., & Wilson, E. O. (1981).Genes, mind, and culture: The coevolutionary process.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, J., & Staski, E. (1988). Individuals and the evolution of biological and cultural systems.Human Evolution, 3,147–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Hara, R. J. (1996). Trees of history in systematics and philology.Memorie della Società Italiana di Scienze Naturali e del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Milano, 22, 81–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plotkin, H. C., & Odling-Smee, F. J. (1981). A multiple-level model of evolution and its implications for sociobiology.Behavioral and Brain Sciences,4,225–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, A. (1994).Instrumental biology or the disunity of science.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schleicher, A. (1869).Darwinism tested by the science of language(Transl. Alex. V. W. Bikkers.). London: John Camden Hotten.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staddon, J. E. R. (1981). On a possible relation between cultural transmission and genetical evolution. In P. P. G. Bateson and P. H. Klopfer (Eds.),Advantages of diversity(Vol. 4, pp. 135–145). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamos, D. N. (1998). Buffon, Darwin, and the non-individuality of species-a reply to Jean Gayon.Biology and Philosophy, 13, 443–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tylor, E. B. (1871).Primitive culture: Researches into the development of mythology, philosophy, religion, art, and custom(2 Vols.). London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, G. (1973). A scientific concept of culture.American Anthropologist, 75, 376–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, L. A. (1959). The concept of culture.American Anthropologist, 61, 227–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, L. A. (1975).The concept of cultural systems: A key to understanding tribes and nations.New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ghiselin, M.T. (2000). Cultures as Supraorganismal Wholes. In: Tonneau, F., Thompson, N.S. (eds) Perspectives in Ethology. Perspectives in Ethology, vol 13. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1221-9_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1221-9_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5447-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-1221-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics