Advertisement

Deformation and Fracture of TiC/Mo(Nb) In-Situ Composites

  • Shuji Hanada
  • Naoyuki Nomura
  • Kyosuke Yoshimi

Abstract

TiC having high melting temperature (3340 K) and relatively low density (4.9 Mg • m−3) is considered to be promising as structural material at very high temperatures above 1500 K. Industrial applications of TiC have been limited, however, only to hard materials or cutting tools because of its low fracture toughness at ambient temperature. To improve the fracture toughness is essential to develop TiC as a structural material. Many studies have addressed the improvement of fracture toughness in ceramics by incorporating a second phase1. Among them, some as-synthesized ex-situ (artificial) composites reinforced by a second phase were found to possess fracture toughness of an acceptable value for industrial material. However, the ex-situ composites consisting of non-equilibrated constituents were degraded in fracture toughness as well as high temperature strength during exposure to high temperature owing to the formation of brittle phase(s) at the interface. These results suggest that a second phase which can be equilibrated with a ceramic should be incorporated to improve the mechanical properties of ceramics at ambient and elevated temperatures.

Keywords

Fracture Toughness Electron Probe Micro Analyzer High Temperature Strength Ductile Phase Show Scanning Electron Microscope Micrographs 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    K.M.Prewo: High Temperature/High Performance Composites, ed. F.D.Lemkey et al., MRS Symp. Proc., Vol. 120, Pittsburgh, MRS, 1988, p. 145.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    K.Ono and J. Moriyama: Handbook of Ternary Alloy Phase Diagrams Vol.6, ed. P.Villars, A.Prince and H.Okamoto, Materials Park, ASM, 1995, p.7200.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    H.Holleck: Handbook of Ternary Alloy Phase Diagrams Vol.6, ed. P.Villars, A.Prince and H.Okamoto, Materials Park, ASM, 1995, p.7O89.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    V.N.Eremenko and T.Ya: Poroshkovaya Met., 5: 3(1963).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    S.Tsurekawa, M.Nakajima and H.Yoshinaga: J.Japan Inst. Metals, 58: 994(1994).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    R.Jackson, H.J.Carvalhinsons and B.B.Argent: J. Inst. Metals, 96: 2469(1968).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    D.L.Anton and D.M.Shah: Intermetallic Matrix Composites, ed. D.L.Anton et al., MRS Symp. Proc, vol. 194, Pittsburgh, MRS, 1990, p. 45.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    K.Tokumoto, H.Shinoaki, T.Kitada and S.Sakaguchi: J. Japan Soc. Powder Metallurgy, 41: 27(1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    K.Hara, H.Yoshinaga and S.Morozumi: J. Japan Inst. Metals, 42:1039(1978).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. Kumar and B. L. Eyre: Proc. R. Soc. Lond., A 370: 431(1980).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. R. Pickens and J. Gurland: Mat. Sci. Eng., 33:135(1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. C. Shaw, D. B. Marchall, M. S. Dadkhah and A G. Evans: Acta metall. mater., 41: 3311(1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shuji Hanada
    • 1
  • Naoyuki Nomura
    • 1
  • Kyosuke Yoshimi
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Materials ResearchTohoku UniversitySendaiJapan

Personalised recommendations