Advertisement

Fast Ionic Transport Along Twin Walls in Ferroelastic Minerals

  • E. K. H. Salje

Abstract

Ionic mobility is often enhanced for transport along grain boundaries when compared with bulk transport. Fine grained ceramics may show much faster transport than single crystals and, thus, observation of fast transport in the natural environment (e.g. mineral assemblies) could be conjectured to be intrinsically linked to grain boundary effects.1,2 This conjecture may not be correct for ferroelastic minerals, however. Such minerals undergo ferroelastic phase transitions which generate characteristic microstructures.3 Simple elements of ferroelastic microstructures are twin boundaries which often combine in order to form more complex patterns such as needles, combs, junctions and forks. In each case the local structural modification inside a twin wall is rather subtle because there are no topological defects present as in grain boundaries. The only changes are small variations of atomic bond distances and/or local changes of atomic ordering schemes. Despite the relative weakness of the structural perturbations, it was found that transport along ferroelastic twin boundaries can be strongly enhanced.

Keywords

Domain Wall Twin Boundary Fast Transport Twin Domain Fast Ionic Transport 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    J. Maier, Electrochemical investigation methods of ionic transport properties in solids, Solid State Phenomena 35,39–40 (1994).ADSGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    L. Eyring, In Nanstoichiometric Oxides, O.T. Sorensen ed. Acad. Press New York (1981).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    E. K. H. Salje, Phase transitions in ferroelastic and co-elastic crystals, student edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, (1993).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. Aird, and E. K. H. Salje, Sheet superconductivity in twin walls: experimental evidence of WO3-x , J.Phys.:Condens. Matter 10 L377–L380,(1998).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. Chrosch, and E. K.H. Salje, The temperature dependence of the domain wall width in LaA103, J. Apply Phys. 85, No. 2, 722–727, (1999).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stuart A. Hayward, et al., Thickness of pericline twin walls in anorthoclase: an X- ray diffraction study, Euro J Mineral 8, 130–1310(1996).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    K R Locherer, J. Chrosch & E K H Salje “Diffuse X-ray Scattering in WO”3. Phase Transitions Vol. 67 (1998) 51–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    E. Salje, B. Wruck and H. Thomas, Order parameter saturation and a low-temperature extension of Landau theory,b Z, Phys B. Condensed Matter 82, (1991), 399–404.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    K. Locherer et al., X-ray analysis of mesoscopic twin structures, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A, 2815–2845, (1996).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    E.K.H. Salje and Y Ishibashi, Mesoscopic structures in ferroelastic crystals: needle twins and right-angled domains, J.Phys.: Condens. Matter 8:44, 8477–8495 (1996).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    E. K.H. Salje et al., Needle twins and right-angled twins in minerals: comparison between experiment and theory, American Mineralogist vol. 83, 811–822 (1998).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    A.M. Bratkovsky, V. Heine and E.K.H. Salje. Strain effects, particularly in phase transitions, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A, 354, 2875–2896 (1996).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. D. Eshelby, Continuum theory of defects, Solid State Phys._3,79 (1956).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    A.M. Bratkovsky et al., Strain coupling as the dominant interaction in structural phase transitions, Phase Transitions, vol 55,79–126 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    A.M. Bratkovsky, et al., The theory of fluctuations and texture embryos in structural phase transitions mediated by strain, J.Phys.: Condens. Matter 6, 3679–3696 (1994).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    I. Tsatskis and E.K.H. Salje, Time evolution of pericline twin domains in alkali feldspars: A computer- simulation study, American Mineralogist, vol. 81, 800–810 (1996).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    K. Parlinski, E.K.H. Salje, and V. Heine, Annealing of Tweed Microstructure in High Tc Superconductors studied by a Computer Simulation, Acta metall mater. 41, no. 3, 839–847 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    D.A. Vul, and E.K.H. Salje, Periodic twin microstructures in YBa2Cu3O7 thin films: a computer simulation study, Physica C253, 231–242 (1995).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    E.K.H. Salje, Structural states of Mg cordierite II: Landau theory, Phys. Chem. Min. 14,455 (1987).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    J. Blackburn, thesis. Time evolution of microstructure in complex systems: a computer simulation study, Cambridge University (1999)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    J.F. Blackburn, and E.K.H. Salje, Time evolution of twin domains in cordierite: a computer simulation study, Phys. Chem. Minerals 26, 275–296 (1999).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    B. Houchmanzadeh, J. Lajzerowicz and E. Salje, “Relaxations near Surfaces and Interfaces for First, Second and Third Neighbour Interactions: Theory and applications to polytypism J. Phys. Condensed Matter 4, 9779–9794 (1992).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. K. H. Salje
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Earth SciencesUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations