Skip to main content

Statistics in Clinical Research

  • Chapter
Cutaneous Biometrics
  • 173 Accesses

Abstract

Statistics in medical research is no longer what it was some 15 years ago: some descriptive measures for a collection of numbers and P-values based on tests appropriately chosen according to the type of data used

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Altman, D. G., 1996, Better reporting of randomised controlled trials: the CONSORT statement, Brit. Med. J 313:570-571

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, P., 1989, Multistage testing with adaptive designs, Biom. Inf. Med. Biol 20:130-148

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, P., and Köhne, K., 1994, Evaluation of experiments with adaptive interim analyses, Biometrics 50:1929-1041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browner, W. S., and Newman, T. B., 1987, Are all significant P values created equal? The analogy between diagnostic tests and clinical research. JAMA 257:2459-2463

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., 1969, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, Academic Press, New York (Rev. Ed. 1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • Colditz G. A., Miller, J. N., and Mosteller, F., 1988, Measuring gain in the evaluation of medical technology. Intern. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care 4:637-642

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, R. J., and Sackett, D. L., 1995, The number needed to treat: A clinical useful measure of treatment effect, Brit. J. Med 310:452-454

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, G. A., and Forrester, J. S., 1983, Clinical trials and statistical verdicts: Probable grounds for appeal. Ann. Int. Med 98:385-394

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • EU Bioequivalence Guideline, 1991, CPMP Working Party on Efficacy of Medicinal Products, Note for Guidance, Investigation of Bioavailability and Bioequivalence, Brussels, Belgium: CPMP (December 1991)

    Google Scholar 

  • EU-Biostatistics Guideline, 1994, Commitee for the Proprietary Medicinal Products. A Note for Guidance on Biostatistical Methodology in Clinical Trials in Applications for Marketing Authorizations for Medicinal Products, Brussels, Belgium: CPMP (December 1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • FDA Guideline 1988, Guideline for the Format and Content of Clinical and Statistical Sections of New Drug Applications. Rockville, MD, US Food and Drug Administration

    Google Scholar 

  • FDA, 1992, Points to consider, Division of Anti-Infective Drug Products

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, M. J., and Altman, D. G., 1986, Confidence intervals rather than P values: Estimation ratherthan hypothesis testing, Brit. Med. J 292:746-750

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, M. J., Machin, D., and Campbell, M. J., 1986, Use of check lists in assessing the statistical content of medical studies, Brit. Med. J 292:810-812

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • German Guideline, 1987, Principles for the Proper Performance of a Clinical Study: Bekanntmachung von Grundsätzen für die ordnungsgemäße Durchführung der klinischen Prüfung, Bundesminister fur Jugend, Familie, Frauen, Gesundheit (BMJFFG) (9.12.1987)

    Google Scholar 

  • Graubard, B. I., and Korn, E. L., 1987, Choice of column scores for testing independence in ordered 2 × k contingency tables, Biometrics 43:471-476

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hasselblad, V., and Hedges, L. V., 1995, Meta-analysis of screening and diagnostic tests, Psychol. Bull 117:167-178

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holm, S., 1979, A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure, Scand. J. Stat 6:65-70

    Google Scholar 

  • ICH-Biostatistics Guideline, 1998, ICH Harmonized Tripartite Guideline, Note for Guidance on Statistical Principles for Clinical Trials, ICH Topic E9, Step 4, Consensus Guideline (February 5, 1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, A., 1985, Sample size: clues, hints or suggestions, J. Chron. Dis 38:721-725

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lachin J. M., 1992, Some large-sample distribution-free estimators and tests for multivariate partially incomplete data from two populations. Stat. Med 11:1151-1170

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laupacis, A., Sackett, D. L., and Roberts, R. S., 1988, An assessment of clinically useful measures of the consequences of treatment, New Engl. J. Med 318:1728-1733

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmacher W., 1989, Schrittweises multiples Testen bei a-priori-geordneten Hypothesen, Int. Report, Gesellschaft für Strahlen- und Umweltforschung (GSF), MEDIS, Neuherberg/Munich, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantel, N., 1963, Chi-square tests with one degree of freedom: Extensions of the Mantel-Haenszel procedure, J. Am. Stat. Assoc 58:690-700

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurer, W., 1987, Statistische Besonderheiten bei klinischen Studien, Biometrisches Seminare, Locarno (September 21-25, 1987)

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurer, W. Hothorn, L. A., and Lehmacher, W., 1995, Multiple comparisons in drug clinical trials and preclinical assays: A priori ordered hypotheses, in: Testing Principles in Clinical and Preclinical Trials, Biometrie in der chemisch-pharmazeutischen Industrie (J. Vollmar ed.) Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart, pp. 3-18

    Google Scholar 

  • Noether, G. E., 1987, Sample size determination for some common nonparametric tests, J. Am. Stat. Assoc 82:645-647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, P. C, 1984, Procedures for comparing samples with multiple endpoints, Biometrics 40:1079-1087

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips. A., 1998, Sample size estimation when comparing more than two treatment groups, Drug Inf. J 32:193-199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahlfs, V. W., and Zimmermann, H., 1993, Scores: Ordinal data with few categories-how should they be analyzed? Drug Inf. J 27:1227-1240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Röhmel, J., 1998, Therapeutic equivalence investigations: statistical considerations, Statist. Med 17: 1703-1714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R., 1991, Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research, Sage Publications, Newbury Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Streitberg, B., 1991, Review of: Daniel, W. W., Applied Nonparametric Statistics, 2nd Ed, PWS-Kent, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Streitberg, B.1990, Biometrics 47:1634-1635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tritchler, D., 1995, Interpreting the standardized difference, Biometrics 51:351-353

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • US Bioequivalence Guideline, 1992, Statistical Procedures for Bioequivalence Studies Using a Standard Two-Treatment Crossover Design, Division of Bioequivalence (HFD-650), Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, MD 20855

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei L. J., and Lachin J. M., 1984, Two-sample asymptotically distribution-free tests for incomplete multivariate observations. J. Am. Stat. Assoc 79:653-661

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rahlfs, V.W. (2000). Statistics in Clinical Research. In: Schwindt, D.A., Maibach, H.I. (eds) Cutaneous Biometrics. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1199-1_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1199-1_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5437-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-1199-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics