Skip to main content
  • 2832 Accesses

Abstract

It is well appreciated that by studying the phase and the amplitude of coherent ultrashort signals that are transmitted, reflected or emitted from materials during linear and nonlinear optical experiments one can obtain valuable information about the optical interactions and the fundamental processes in those material systems. Many of the signals of interest (e.g., those from four wave mixing (FWM) experiments) are very weak and require very sensitive measurement techniques. As described in previous chapters, characterization techniques [13] that provide both the amplitude and phase of an ultrashort pulse have been developed over the last decade, but each requires a nonlinear process. Consequently, both for practical and for fundamental reasons, they are of no use for very weak signals. Recently, in partial response to this need, a method of completely measuring the intensity and phase of an almost arbitrarily weak coherent signal has been demonstrated by performing spectral interferometry (SI) [49] with a well-characterized reference pulse [8,9]. The latter technique has been given the acronym TADPOLE by Fittinghoff et al. [9] and is described in some detail in the previous chapter. As described in Chapter 22, however, TADPOLE (and similar) techniques are scalar in nature. That is, they characterize the amplitude and phase of only a single polarization component.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. K. W. DeLong, R. Trebino, and D. J. Kane, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 11,1595 (1994) and references therein.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. J. L. A. Chilla and O. E. Martinez, Opt. Lett. 16, 39 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. K. C. Chu, J. Heritage, R. S. Grant, K. X. Liu, A. Dienes, W. E. White, and A. Sullivan, Opt. Lett. 16, 39 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. C. Froehly, A. Lacourt, and J. C. Vienot, J. Opt. (Paris) 4, 183 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. Piasecki, B. Colombeau, M Vampouille, C. Froehly, and J. A. Arnaud, Appl. Opt. 19, 3749 (1980).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. F. Reynaud, F. Salin, and A. Barthelemy, Opt. Lett. 14, 275 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. E. Tokunaga, A. Terasaki, and T. Kobayashi, Opt. Lett. 17,1131 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. J. P. Geindre, P. Audebert, A. Rousse, F. Falliès, J. C. Gauthier, A. Mysrowicz, A. Dos Santos, G. Hamoniaux, and A. Anonetti, Opt. Lett. 19,1997 (1994).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. L. Lepetit, G. Chériaux and M. Joffre, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 12, 2467 (1995).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. D. N. Fittinghoff, J. L. Bowie, J. N. Sweetser, R. T. Jennings, M. A. Krümbugel, K. W. DeLong, R. Trebino, I. A. Walmsley, Opt. Lett. 21, 884 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. W. A. Schroeder, D. S. McCallum, D. R. Harken, M. D. Dvorak, D. R. Andersen, A. L. Smirl, B. S. Wherrett, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 12,402 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  12. S. Patkar, A. E. Paul, W Sha, J. A. Bolger, A. L. Smirl, Phys. Rev. B 51,10,789 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. E. Paul, J. A. Bolger, A. L. Smirl, J. G. Pelligrino: J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 13,1016 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. J. A. Bolger, A. E. Paul, A. L. Smirl: Phys. Rev. B 54,11666 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. K. W. DeLong, R. Trebino, J. Hunter, and W E. White, J. Opt. Am. B. 11, 2206 (1994) and references therein.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. M. Kujawinska, in Interferogram Analysis, D. W. Robinson and G. T. Reid, eds. (Institute of Physics, Bristol, UK, 1993), pp. 141-193.

    Google Scholar 

  17. W. J. Walecki, D. N. Fittinghoff, A. L. Smirl, R. Trebino: Opt. Lett. 22, 81 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. X. Chen, W. J. Walecki, O. Buccafusca, D. N. Fittinghoff, A. L. Smirl: Phys. Rev. B 56,9738 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. O. Buccafusca, X. Chen, W. Walecki, A. L. Smirl: J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 15,1218 (1998).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. A. L. Smirl: In Semiconductor Quantum Optoelectronics: From Quantum Physics to Smart Devices, edited by A. Miller, M. Ebrahimzadeh and D. M. Finlayson (Institute of Physics Publishing, London, 1999), pp. 25-94.

    Google Scholar 

  21. A. L. Smirl: In Ultrafast Phenomena in Semiconductors, edited by K-T Tsen (Springer Verlag, New York, 2000) pp.

    Google Scholar 

  22. K. Leo, E. O. Göbel, T. C. Damen, J. Shah, S. Schmitt-Rink, W. Shäfer, J. F. Müller, K. Köhler, P. Ganser: Phys. Rev. B 44, 5726 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. K. Leo, T. C. Damen, J. Shah, E. O. Gobel, K. Köhler: Appl Phys. Lett. 57, 19 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. K. Leo, T. C. Damen, J. Shah, K. Köhler: Phys. Rev. B 42, 11359 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. E. O. Göbel, K. Leo, J. Damen, J. Shah, S. Schmitt-Rink, W. Schäfer, J. F. Müller, K. Köhler: Phys, Rev. Lett. 64, 1801(1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. M. Koch, J. Feldmann, G. von Plessen, E. O. Gobel, P. Thomas, K. Köhler: Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 3631 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. V. G. Lyssenko, J. Erland, I. Balslev, K.-H. Pantke, B. S. Razbirin, J. M. Hvam: Phys. Rev. B 48, 5720 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. S. Schmitt-Rink, D. Bennhardt, V. Heuckeroth, P. Thomas, P. Haring, G. Maidorn, H. Bakker, K. Leo, D. S. Kim, J. Shah, K. Köhler: Phys. Rev. B 46, 10460 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. J. Kuhl, E. J. Mayer, G. Smith, R. Eccleston, D. Bennhardt, P. Thomas, K. Bott, O. Heller: In Coherent Optical Interactions in Semiconductors, edited by R. T Phillips (Plenum, New York, 1994), pp. 1-31, and references therein.

    Google Scholar 

  30. A. Tookey, D. J. Bain, I. J. Blewett, I. Galbraith, A. K. Kar, B. S. Wherrett, B. Vögele, K. A. Prior, B. C. Cavenett: J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 15, 64 (1998).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. A. L. Smirl, X. Chen, O. Buccafusca: Opt. Lett. 23, 1120 (1998).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. A. L. Smirl, X. Chen, O. Buccafusca, IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 35, 523 (1999).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. R. M. A. Azzam, N. M. Bashara: Ellipsometry and Polarized Light (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  34. D. N. Fittinghoff, J. L. Bowie, J. N. Sweetser, R. T Jennings, M. A. Krumbügel, K. W. DeLong, R. Trebino, I. A. Walmsley: Opt. Lett. 21, 884 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Smirl, A.L. (2000). Measuring Ultrafast Polarization Dynamics: POLLIWOG. In: Frequency-Resolved Optical Gating: The Measurement of Ultrashort Laser Pulses. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1181-6_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1181-6_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5432-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-1181-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics