No, this isn’t one of those age-old unresolvable dilemmas, the kind that frustrated ancient Greek philosophers. True, it’s reminiscent of Zeno’s paradox, which considered how finely one may divide distances, rather than durations of time. And it’s equally confounding. But, in fact, the above dilemma is a recently solved optical measurement problem, which, until a few years ago, badly frustrated modern laser scientists.
KeywordsNickel Autocorrelation Convolution Sapphire Acoustics
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 7.T. S. Clement, G. Rodriguez, W. M. Wood, and A. J. Taylor, “Characterization of ultrafast interactions with materials through direct measurement of the optical phase,” in Generation, Amplification, and Measurement of Ultrashort Laser Pulses III, vol. 2701: SPIE, 1996, pp. 229–34.Google Scholar
- 8.M. Dugan, J. X. Tull, J.-K. Rhee, and W. S. Warren, “High-Resolution Ultrafast Laser Pulse Shaping for Quantum Control and Terabit per Second Communications,” in Ultrafast Phenomena X, vol. 62, P. F. Barbara, J. G. Fujimoto, W. H. Knox, and W. Zinth, Eds. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1996, pp. 26–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.A. M. Weiner, “Femtosecond Optical Pulse Shaping and Processing,” Progress in Quantum Electronics, 1995.Google Scholar
- 10.E. P. Ippen and C. V. Shank, Ultrashort Light Pulses—Picosecond Techniques and Applications. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1977.Google Scholar